图学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 844-853.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026040844
王雨涛1,2,3, 杨超1, 况立群1,2,3, 杨晓文1,2,3, 韩燮1,2,3, 焦世超1,2,3(
)
收稿日期:2026-03-14
接受日期:2026-05-22
出版日期:2026-08-31
发布日期:2026-08-31
通讯作者:焦世超,E-mail:20230006@nuc.edu.cn基金资助:
WANG Yutao1,2,3, YANG Chao1, KUANG Liqun1,2,3, YANG Xiaowen1,2,3, HAN Xie1,2,3, JIAO Shichao1,2,3(
)
Received:2026-03-14
Accepted:2026-05-22
Published:2026-08-31
Online:2026-08-31
Contact:
JIAO Shichao,E-mail:20230006@nuc.edu.cnSupported by:摘要:
基于草图的三维模型检索,由于其直观的人机交互方式,已成为三维模型检索领域中一个重要研究方向。然而,在实际应用中三维模型类别数量庞大且持续增长,训练数据难以覆盖所有潜在类别,使得传统基于类别标签的监督学习检索方法难以适应开放环境下的新类别检索需求。因此,基于草图的三维模型零样本检索成为提升模型开放场景适应能力的重要研究内容。该任务不仅需要解决草图和三维模型之间的模态差异,还需要在缺乏未知类别样本的条件下,实现从已见类别向未见类别的有效知识迁移。为解决上述问题,设计了层次化对齐方法,通过输入层与特征层的渐进式对齐策略缓解跨模态差异的同时实现知识迁移。在输入层,通过对抗学习方法生成伪视图,将草图转化为更接近三维模型多视图的伪视图表示,从源头缓解模态差异;在特征层,先建立共享的语义嵌入空间,结合多粒度度量学习方法,引入语义一致性约束、语义增强机制和类级代理约束,提升特征表达能力。在SHREC 2013和SHREC 2014数据集上的实验结果表明层次化对齐框架在多项性能指标上取得了具有竞争力的结果。消融实验进一步证明伪视图生成机制和多粒度度量学习策略的有效性,说明输入层的模态对齐以及特征层的语义对齐能够协同优化跨模态特征表示,提升零样本检索性能。
中图分类号:
王雨涛, 杨超, 况立群, 杨晓文, 韩燮, 焦世超. 基于层次化对齐的三维模型零样本草图检索[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(4): 844-853.
WANG Yutao, YANG Chao, KUANG Liqun, YANG Xiaowen, HAN Xie, JIAO Shichao. Hierarchical alignment for zero-shot sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(4): 844-853.
| 数据集 | 种类 | 查询数量 | 目标数量 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 训练 | 测试 | |||
| SHREC 2013 | 90 | 4 500 | 2 700 | 1 258 |
| SHREC 2014 | 171 | 8 550 | 5 130 | 8 987 |
表1 SHREC 2013与SHREC 2014数据集的关键属性
Table 1 Key properties of SHREC 2013 and SHREC 2014
| 数据集 | 种类 | 查询数量 | 目标数量 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 训练 | 测试 | |||
| SHREC 2013 | 90 | 4 500 | 2 700 | 1 258 |
| SHREC 2014 | 171 | 8 550 | 5 130 | 8 987 |
| 数据集 分类 | 参考文献 | SHREC 2013 | SHREC 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 训练种类 | 测试种类 | 训练种类 | 测试种类 | ||
| 1 | [ | 67 | 23 | 133 | 38 |
| 2 | [ [ | 79 | 11 | 151 | 20 |
表2 用于零样本检索的SHREC 2013与SHREC 2014数据集的关键属性
Table 2 Key properties of SHREC 2013 and SHREC 2014 for zero-shot retrieval
| 数据集 分类 | 参考文献 | SHREC 2013 | SHREC 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 训练种类 | 测试种类 | 训练种类 | 测试种类 | ||
| 1 | [ | 67 | 23 | 133 | 38 |
| 2 | [ [ | 79 | 11 | 151 | 20 |
| 方法 | NN | FT | ST | DCG | MAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siamese-CNN[ | 0.137 | 0.124 | 0.117 | 0.186 | 0.201 |
| DCHML[ | 0.183 | 0.211 | 0.136 | 0.238 | 0.339 |
| TCL[ | 0.250 | 0.178 | 0.203 | 0.314 | 0.317 |
| CGN[ | 0.333 | 0.294 | 0.225 | 0.398 | 0.386 |
| PCL[ | 0.383 | 0.389 | 0.261 | 0.470 | 0.480 |
| ACNet[ | 0.455 | 0.354 | 0.266 | 0.594 | 0.432 |
| GFCFS[ | 0.433 | 0.344 | 0.273 | 0.598 | 0.437 |
| SBKA[ | 0.253 | 0.198 | 0.158 | 0.454 | 0.251 |
| HA (Ours) | 0.486 | 0.408 | 0.304 | 0.637 | 0.490 |
表3 在SHREC 2013(Split1)上零样本检索结果
Table 3 Zero-shot retrieval performance on SHREC 2013 under Split 1
| 方法 | NN | FT | ST | DCG | MAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siamese-CNN[ | 0.137 | 0.124 | 0.117 | 0.186 | 0.201 |
| DCHML[ | 0.183 | 0.211 | 0.136 | 0.238 | 0.339 |
| TCL[ | 0.250 | 0.178 | 0.203 | 0.314 | 0.317 |
| CGN[ | 0.333 | 0.294 | 0.225 | 0.398 | 0.386 |
| PCL[ | 0.383 | 0.389 | 0.261 | 0.470 | 0.480 |
| ACNet[ | 0.455 | 0.354 | 0.266 | 0.594 | 0.432 |
| GFCFS[ | 0.433 | 0.344 | 0.273 | 0.598 | 0.437 |
| SBKA[ | 0.253 | 0.198 | 0.158 | 0.454 | 0.251 |
| HA (Ours) | 0.486 | 0.408 | 0.304 | 0.637 | 0.490 |
| 方法 | NN | FT | ST | DCG | MAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siamese-CNN[ | 0.100 | 0.086 | 0.087 | 0.136 | 0.170 |
| DCHML[ | 0.167 | 0.177 | 0.179 | 0.273 | 0.300 |
| TCL[ | 0.231 | 0.216 | 0.191 | 0.306 | 0.328 |
| CGN[ | 0.263 | 0.250 | 0.214 | 0.351 | 0.356 |
| PCL[ | 0.333 | 0.328 | 0.228 | 0.399 | 0.434 |
| ACNet[ | 0.391 | 0.328 | 0.221 | 0.562 | 0.407 |
| SGFCFS[ | 0.322 | 0.273 | 0.194 | 0.528 | 0.361 |
| SBKA[ | 0.212 | 0.291 | 0.146 | 0.443 | 0.269 |
| HA (Ours) | 0.403 | 0.339 | 0.230 | 0.578 | 0.426 |
表4 在SHREC 2014(Split 1)上零样本检索结果
Table 4 Zero-shot retrieval performance on SHREC 2014 under Split 1
| 方法 | NN | FT | ST | DCG | MAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siamese-CNN[ | 0.100 | 0.086 | 0.087 | 0.136 | 0.170 |
| DCHML[ | 0.167 | 0.177 | 0.179 | 0.273 | 0.300 |
| TCL[ | 0.231 | 0.216 | 0.191 | 0.306 | 0.328 |
| CGN[ | 0.263 | 0.250 | 0.214 | 0.351 | 0.356 |
| PCL[ | 0.333 | 0.328 | 0.228 | 0.399 | 0.434 |
| ACNet[ | 0.391 | 0.328 | 0.221 | 0.562 | 0.407 |
| SGFCFS[ | 0.322 | 0.273 | 0.194 | 0.528 | 0.361 |
| SBKA[ | 0.212 | 0.291 | 0.146 | 0.443 | 0.269 |
| HA (Ours) | 0.403 | 0.339 | 0.230 | 0.578 | 0.426 |
| 方法 | NN | FT | ST | DCG | MAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siamese-CNN [ | 0.137 | 0.114 | 0.203 | 0.404 | 0.171 |
| DCHML[ | 0.317 | 0.304 | 0.421 | 0.581 | 0.361 |
| TCL[ | 0.337 | 0.357 | 0.537 | 0.589 | 0.426 |
| CGN[ | 0.512 | 0.458 | 0.647 | 0.673 | 0.515 |
| DD-GAN[ | 0.522 | 0.464 | 0.649 | 0.682 | 0.523 |
| ACNet[ | 0.552 | 0.431 | 0.606 | 0.683 | 0.472 |
| GFCFS[ | 0.440 | 0.414 | 0.588 | 0.651 | 0.440 |
| CoDi[ | 0.544 | 0.589 | 0.706 | 0.742 | 0.637 |
| SBKA[ | 0.421 | 0.278 | 0.442 | 0.566 | 0.329 |
| TriAlign[ | 0.563 | 0.492 | 0.668 | 0.692 | 0.570 |
| HA (Ours) | 0.633 | 0.503 | 0.685 | 0.726 | 0.557 |
表5 在SHREC 2013(Split2)上零样本检索结果
Table 5 Zero-shot retrieval performance on SHREC 2013 under Split 2
| 方法 | NN | FT | ST | DCG | MAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siamese-CNN [ | 0.137 | 0.114 | 0.203 | 0.404 | 0.171 |
| DCHML[ | 0.317 | 0.304 | 0.421 | 0.581 | 0.361 |
| TCL[ | 0.337 | 0.357 | 0.537 | 0.589 | 0.426 |
| CGN[ | 0.512 | 0.458 | 0.647 | 0.673 | 0.515 |
| DD-GAN[ | 0.522 | 0.464 | 0.649 | 0.682 | 0.523 |
| ACNet[ | 0.552 | 0.431 | 0.606 | 0.683 | 0.472 |
| GFCFS[ | 0.440 | 0.414 | 0.588 | 0.651 | 0.440 |
| CoDi[ | 0.544 | 0.589 | 0.706 | 0.742 | 0.637 |
| SBKA[ | 0.421 | 0.278 | 0.442 | 0.566 | 0.329 |
| TriAlign[ | 0.563 | 0.492 | 0.668 | 0.692 | 0.570 |
| HA (Ours) | 0.633 | 0.503 | 0.685 | 0.726 | 0.557 |
| 方法 | NN | FT | ST | DCG | MAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siamese-CNN [ | 0.097 | 0.102 | 0.113 | 0.341 | 0.108 |
| DCHML[ | 0.157 | 0.134 | 0.145 | 0.376 | 0.187 |
| TCL[ | 0.279 | 0.257 | 0.153 | 0.459 | 0.237 |
| CGN[ | 0.401 | 0.324 | 0.429 | 0.571 | 0.332 |
| DD-GAN[ | 0.425 | 0.354 | 0.462 | 0.592 | 0.371 |
| ACNet[ | 0.507 | 0.355 | 0.469 | 0.238 | 0.369 |
| GFCFS[ | 0.348 | 0.303 | 0.421 | 0.579 | 0.331 |
| CoDi[ | 0.540 | 0.372 | 0.495 | 0.642 | 0.395 |
| SBKA[ | 0.491 | 0.328 | 0.454 | 0.619 | 0.362 |
| TriAlign[ | 0.443 | 0.368 | 0.481 | 0.613 | 0.390 |
| HA (Ours) | 0.544 | 0.392 | 0.509 | 0.646 | 0.412 |
表6 在SHREC 2014(Split 2)上零样本检索结果
Table 6 Zero-shot retrieval performance on SHREC 2014 under Split 2
| 方法 | NN | FT | ST | DCG | MAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siamese-CNN [ | 0.097 | 0.102 | 0.113 | 0.341 | 0.108 |
| DCHML[ | 0.157 | 0.134 | 0.145 | 0.376 | 0.187 |
| TCL[ | 0.279 | 0.257 | 0.153 | 0.459 | 0.237 |
| CGN[ | 0.401 | 0.324 | 0.429 | 0.571 | 0.332 |
| DD-GAN[ | 0.425 | 0.354 | 0.462 | 0.592 | 0.371 |
| ACNet[ | 0.507 | 0.355 | 0.469 | 0.238 | 0.369 |
| GFCFS[ | 0.348 | 0.303 | 0.421 | 0.579 | 0.331 |
| CoDi[ | 0.540 | 0.372 | 0.495 | 0.642 | 0.395 |
| SBKA[ | 0.491 | 0.328 | 0.454 | 0.619 | 0.362 |
| TriAlign[ | 0.443 | 0.368 | 0.481 | 0.613 | 0.390 |
| HA (Ours) | 0.544 | 0.392 | 0.509 | 0.646 | 0.412 |
| 方法 | NN | FT | ST | DCG | MAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 0.384 | 0.287 | 0.408 | 0.570 | 0.304 |
| Baseline+SC | 0.393 | 0.309 | 0.434 | 0.590 | 0.329 |
| Baseline +SE | 0.395 | 0.297 | 0.412 | 0.577 | 0.319 |
| Baseline+SC+SE | 0.402 | 0.313 | 0.434 | 0.592 | 0.336 |
| Baseline+SVG | 0.423 | 0.337 | 0.474 | 0.613 | 0.356 |
| Baseline+ SVG +SC | 0.525 | 0.371 | 0.495 | 0.638 | 0.395 |
| Baseline+SVG+SE | 0.527 | 0.388 | 0.506 | 0.642 | 0.407 |
| HA(Ours) | 0.544 | 0.392 | 0.509 | 0.646 | 0.412 |
表7 SHREC 2014(Split 2)上零样本检索的消融实验结果
Table 7 Ablation Study of Zero-shot Retrieval on SHREC 2014 (Split 2)
| 方法 | NN | FT | ST | DCG | MAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 0.384 | 0.287 | 0.408 | 0.570 | 0.304 |
| Baseline+SC | 0.393 | 0.309 | 0.434 | 0.590 | 0.329 |
| Baseline +SE | 0.395 | 0.297 | 0.412 | 0.577 | 0.319 |
| Baseline+SC+SE | 0.402 | 0.313 | 0.434 | 0.592 | 0.336 |
| Baseline+SVG | 0.423 | 0.337 | 0.474 | 0.613 | 0.356 |
| Baseline+ SVG +SC | 0.525 | 0.371 | 0.495 | 0.638 | 0.395 |
| Baseline+SVG+SE | 0.527 | 0.388 | 0.506 | 0.642 | 0.407 |
| HA(Ours) | 0.544 | 0.392 | 0.509 | 0.646 | 0.412 |
图4 在SHREC 2014(split2)上,8种不同的消融实验设置下特征嵌入的t-SNE可视化结果
Fig. 4 t-SNE visualization of feature embeddings on SHREC 2014 (Split 2) under the eight settings of ablation studies
| 数据集 | 输入类别 | 时间/s | NN | FT | ST | DCG | MAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHREC 2013 | Sketch | 0.016 02 | 0.585 | 0.497 | 0.667 | 0.713 | 0.539 |
| Generated View | 0.023 53 | 0.633 | 0.503 | 0.685 | 0.726 | 0.557 | |
| SHREC 2014 | Sketch | 0.020 51 | 0.491 | 0.372 | 0.502 | 0.634 | 0.391 |
| Generated View | 0.028 26 | 0.544 | 0.392 | 0.509 | 0.646 | 0.412 |
表8 在SHREC 2013 (Split 2)和SHREC 2014(Split 2)数据集上使用不同查询输入的零样本检索性能
Table 8 Zero-shot retrieval performance on SHREC 2013 and SHREC 2014 under Split 2 using different query inputs
| 数据集 | 输入类别 | 时间/s | NN | FT | ST | DCG | MAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHREC 2013 | Sketch | 0.016 02 | 0.585 | 0.497 | 0.667 | 0.713 | 0.539 |
| Generated View | 0.023 53 | 0.633 | 0.503 | 0.685 | 0.726 | 0.557 | |
| SHREC 2014 | Sketch | 0.020 51 | 0.491 | 0.372 | 0.502 | 0.634 | 0.391 |
| Generated View | 0.028 26 | 0.544 | 0.392 | 0.509 | 0.646 | 0.412 |
| [1] |
DAI Y, FENG Y F, MA N, et al. Cross-modal 3D shape retrieval via heterogeneous dynamic graph representation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025, 47(4): 2370-2387.
DOI PMID |
| [2] |
SU Y W, LI W J, BAI J, et al. SKD-SBSR: structural knowledge distillation for sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2025, 310: 112891.
DOI URL |
| [3] | SU Y W, BAI J, LIN G. DKD2L: dual knowledge distillation dynamic learning for sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[C]// ICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. New York: IEEE Press, 2025: 1-5. |
| [4] |
YUAN S H, WEN C C, LIU Y S, et al. Retrieval-specific view learning for sketch-to-shape retrieval[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2025, 27: 768-779.
DOI URL |
| [5] | WANG B R, ZHOU Y. Doodle to object: practical zero-shot sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[C]// The 37th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2023: 2474-2482. |
| [6] | XU R, HAN Z Y, HUI L, et al. Domain disentangled generative adversarial network for zero-shot sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[C]// The 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2022: 2902-2910. |
| [7] |
MENG M, CHEN W H, LIU J G, et al. CoDi: contrastive disentanglement generative adversarial networks for zero-shot sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025, 35(2): 1910-1920.
DOI URL |
| [8] | POURPANAH F, ABDAR M, LUO Y X, et al. A review of generalized zero-shot learning methods[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023, 45(4): 4051-4070. |
| [9] | ZHU C J, CUI D D, JIA Q, et al. Sketch-based 3D shape retrieval with multi-view fusion transformer[C]// ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. New York: IEEE Press, 2024: 3005-3009. |
| [10] | 唐静, 彭伟龙, 唐可可, 等. 基于多视图网络三维形状检索的通用扰动攻击[J]. 图学学报, 2022, 43(1): 93-100. |
| TANG J, PENG W L, TANG K K, et al. MvUPA: universal perturbation attack against 3D shape retrieval based on multi-view networks[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2022, 43(1): 93-100 (in Chinese). | |
| [11] | WANG F, KANG L, LI Y. Sketch-based 3D shape retrieval using convolutional neural networks[C]// 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE Press, 2015: 1875-1883. |
| [12] | ZHU F, XIE J, FANG Y. Learning cross-domain neural networks for sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[C]// The 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2016: 3683-3689. |
| [13] | CHEN J X, FANG Y. Deep cross-modality adaptation via semantics preserving adversarial learning for sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[C]// The 15th European Conference on Computer Vision. Cham: Springer, 2018: 624-640. |
| [14] | HE X W, ZHOU Y, ZHOU Z C, et al. Triplet-center loss for multi-view 3D object retrieval[C]// 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE Press, 2018: 1945-1954. |
| [15] | 杨瞻源, 白静, 李文静, 等. 面向三维模型草图检索的三元层次度量网络[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2024, 36(11): 1791-1804. |
| YANG Z Y, BAI J, LI W J, et al. Triplet hierarchical metric network for sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2024, 36(11): 1791-1804 (in Chinese). | |
| [16] |
LIANG S, DAI W D, CHENG C M, et al. Rethinking sketch- based 3D shape retrieval: a simple baseline and benchmark reconstruction[J]. Neurocomputing, 2025, 618: 128990.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
BAI S J, BAI J. HDA2L: hierarchical domain-augmented adaptive learning for sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2023, 264: 110302.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
LI W J, BAI J, ZHENG H. D2GL: dual-level dual-scale graph learning for sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2024, 156: 110768.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
BAI S J, BAI J, XU H, et al. PAGML: precise alignment guided metric learning for sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[J]. Image and Vision Computing, 2023, 136: 104756.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
LIANG S, DAI W D, WEI Y C. Uncertainty learning for noise resistant sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2021, 30: 8632-8643.
DOI URL |
| [21] | HOU W T, DIAO Z Y, PENG J L. Sketch-based 3D shape retrieval via cross-modal contrastive learning and difficulty-aware uncertainty regularization[C]// The 7th Chinese Conference on Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision. Cham: Springer: 2024: 521-534. |
| [22] |
BAI S J, LI Y L, CHANG R H, et al. SCDL: sketch causal disentangled learning for sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025, 35(7): 7239-7252.
DOI URL |
| [23] | 白静, 袁涛, 范有福. ZS3D-Net: 面向三维模型的零样本分类网络[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2022, 34(7): 1118-1126. |
| BAI J, YUAN T, FAN Y F. ZS3D-Net: zero-shot classification network for 3D models[J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2022, 34(7): 1118-1126 (in Chinese). | |
| [24] |
SU Y T, LI J Y, LI W H, et al. Semantically guided projection for zero-shot 3D model classification and retrieval[J]. Multimedia Systems, 2022, 28(6): 2437-2451.
DOI |
| [25] | 晏浩, 白静, 郑虎. 一致性约束引导的零样本三维模型分类网络[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2025, 30(5): 1450-1465. |
|
YAN H, BAI J, ZHENG H. Consistency constraint guided network for zero-shot 3D classification[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2025, 30(5): 1450-1465 (in Chinese).
DOI URL |
|
| [26] | 范有福, 白静, 邵会会, 等. 判别性特征引导的零样本三维模型分类算法[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2024, 36(2): 223-235. |
| FAN Y F, BAI J, SHAO H H, et al. Discriminative feature-guided zero-shot learning of 3D model classification algorithm[J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2024, 36(2): 223-235 (in Chinese). | |
| [27] |
HAO Y, SU Y K, LIN G S, et al. Contrastive generative network with recursive-loop for 3D point cloud generalized zero-shot classification[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2023, 144: 109843.
DOI URL |
| [28] | XU Y, FENG Y F, JIANG Y. Structure-aware residual-center representation for self-supervised open-set 3D cross-modal retrieval[C]// 2024 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. New York: IEEE Press, 2024: 1-6. |
| [29] |
XU Y, FENG Y F, ZHUANG X, et al. Residual fuzzy alignment on hypergraph for open-set 3D cross-modal retrieval[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2025, 27: 7285-7298.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
FENG Y F, JI S Y, LIU Y S, et al. Hypergraph-based multi-modal representation for open-set 3D object retrieval[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024, 46(4): 2206-2223.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
PENG B, CHEN L, SONG J H, et al. ZS-SBPRnet: a zero-shot sketch-based point cloud retrieval network based on feature projection and cross-reconstruction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2023, 19(8): 9194-9203.
DOI URL |
| [32] | ZHU J Y, PARK T, ISOLA P, et al. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks[C]// 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. New York: IEEE Press, 2017: 2242-2251. |
| [33] | ZHAI A, WU H Y. Classification is a Strong Baseline for Deep Metric Learning[EB/OL]. [2026-01-10]. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Classification-is-a-Strong-Baseline-for-Deep-Metric-Zhai-Wu/807257e0a934d3600db9d9b4a12f7194ac8ae2c2 |
| [34] | LI B, LU Y, GODIL A, SCHRECK T, et al. SHREC’13 track: large scale sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[C]// The 6th Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval. Goslar: Eurographics Association, 2013: 89-96. |
| [35] | LI B, LU Y, LI C F, et al. SHREC’14 track: extended large scale sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[C]// The 7th Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval. Goslar: Eurographics Association, 2014: 121-130. |
| [36] |
DAI G X, XIE J, FANG Y. Deep correlated holistic metric learning for sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2018, 27(7): 3374-3386.
DOI PMID |
| [37] | DAI W D, LIANG S. Cross-modal guidance network for sketch-based 3D shape retrieval[C]// 2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. New York: IEEE Press, 2020: 1-6. |
| [38] |
REN H, ZHENG Z Q, WU Y, et al. ACNet: approaching- and-centralizing network for zero-shot sketch-based image retrieval[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2023, 33(9): 5022-5035.
DOI URL |
| [39] | JIAO S C, HAN X, KUANG L Q, et al. Global semantics correlation transmitting and learning for sketch-based cross-domain visual retrieval[J]. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2024, 10(5): 6931-6952. |
| [40] |
LIU D C, LUO X, PENG C L, et al. Symmetrical bidirectional knowledge alignment for zero-shot sketch-based image retrieval[J]. Neural Networks, 2026, 193: 107980
DOI URL |
| [41] | 陈文航. 基于草图的零样本三维模型检索研究[D]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2025. |
| CHEN W H. Research on sketch-based zero-shot 3D shape retrieval[D]. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Technology, 2025 (in Chinese). |
| [1] | 李煜华, 姜杉, 杨志永, 王禹泽, 周泽洋. 物理增强-深度协同的自由式三维超声重建[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(4): 726-735. |
| [2] | 李秀梅, 周正鑫, 孙军梅. 一种定位分支辅助的多任务协同图像伪造检测模型[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(3): 524-533. |
| [3] | 吴文欢, 王文舒, 王舒鳌. 融合层次化双流注意力的单目深度估计方法[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(3): 553-563. |
| [4] | 卢德辉, 宋琢, 黄志超, 田时雨, 李慧敏, 田茂, 邓逸川. 基于TrueSkill排序与深度学习的绿色工地主观视觉感知预测[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(3): 641-652. |
| [5] | 闫康, 曾理, 顾晓清. 基于跨域结构化深度字典学习的图像分类方法[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(2): 341-350. |
| [6] | 庞敏, 李振堂, 张元, 崔晓康, 熊风光. 基于检索与变形技术的三维模型重构[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(2): 368-379. |
| [7] | 董文益, 杨伟东, 唐冰慧, 王琦, 肖宏宇. 基于深度学习的肝脏局灶性病变检测方法综述[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(1): 1-16. |
| [8] | 翟永杰, 王紫萱, 张祯琪, 周迅琪, 王乾铭. 融合双重注意力与加权动态卷积的车辆损伤分类模型[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(1): 17-28. |
| [9] | 潘宇轩, 金锐, 刘雨, 张琳. 基于生成模型的无监督多视点立体视觉网络[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(1): 29-38. |
| [10] | 酒明远, 吴国伟, 宋旭光, 李书攀, 徐明亮. 基于不确定性引导的智能强化主动学习图像分类方法[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(1): 47-56. |
| [11] | 杨彪, 王学, 官铮, 龙萍. BSD-YOLO:基于动态稀疏注意力与自适应检测头的小目标车辆检测方法[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(1): 99-110. |
| [12] | 琚晨, 丁嘉欣, 王泽兴, 李广钊, 管振祥, 张常有. 面向有限元法的图神经网络形函数近似方法[J]. 图学学报, 2025, 46(6): 1161-1171. |
| [13] | 易斌, 张立斌, 刘丹楹, 唐军, 方俊俊, 李雯琦. 基于AMTA-Net的卷制过程激光打孔通风率预测模型[J]. 图学学报, 2025, 46(6): 1224-1232. |
| [14] | 薄文, 琚晨, 刘维青, 张焱, 胡晶晶, 程婧晗, 张常有. 基于退化感知时序建模的装备维保时机预测方法[J]. 图学学报, 2025, 46(6): 1233-1246. |
| [15] | 赵振兵, 欧阳文斌, 冯烁, 李浩鹏, 马隽. 基于类内稀疏先验与改进YOLOv8的绝缘子红外图像检测方法[J]. 图学学报, 2025, 46(6): 1247-1256. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||