欢迎访问《图学学报》 分享到:

图学学报

• 人机交互 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多因素融合的健身器材人机界面 评价方法研究

  

  1. (1. 太原理工大学机械与运载工程学院,山西 太原 030024; 2. 山西澳瑞特健康产业股份有限公司,山西 长治 046000)
  • 出版日期:2019-10-31 发布日期:2019-11-06
  • 基金资助:
    山西省研究生教育改革研究课题(2017JG30);山西省科技重大专项(20131101002)

Research on Evaluation Method of Human-Machine Interface of Fitness Equipment Based on Multi-factor Fusion

  1. (1. School of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan Shanxi 030024, China; 
    2. Shanxi Orient Health Industry Limited by Share Ltd, Changzhi Shanxi 046000, China)
  • Online:2019-10-31 Published:2019-11-06

摘要: 为了优化健身器材界面操作的人机体验,加强界面造型与企业文化的融合度,提 出了多因素融合的健身器材人机界面评价方法,首先运用语义差异法,美度评价公式,征集用 户试验 3 种方法,对样本的产品意象风格、布局美度评价、人机绩效测评 3 个指标进行综合评 价;然后运用模糊层次分析法实现多目标意向下方案的最优决策;最终以某企业健身车界面设 计为例,验证了该方法在多目标决策中的可行性。实验表明该方法在优化用户体验的同时提高 了产品的品牌识别度,为设计师提供了可靠的科学依据。

关键词: 人机界面, 多因素融合, 健身器材, 模糊层次分析法, 因子分析, 美度评价, 绩 效评估

Abstract: In order to optimize the human-machine experience of interface operation of fitness equipment and strengthen the integration of interface modeling and corporate culture, a multi-factor integration evaluation method of human-machine interface of fitness equipment is proposed. Firstly, a method based on semantic difference, beauty evaluation formula and user test were combined to evaluate the three indicators of samples, including product image style, layout beauty and human-machine performance. Then the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) is employed to realize the optimal decision-making of multi-objective intentional downward scheme. Finally, the interface design of a corporate exercise bike is taken as an example to verify the feasibility of this method in multi-objective decision making. Experiments show that this method not only optimizes user experience, but also improves the brand recognition of products providing a reliable scientific basis for designers.

Key words: human-machine interface, multi-factor-integrated, fitness equipment, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, factor analysis, aesthetic evaluation, performance evaluation