Journal of Graphics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1259-1266.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2023061259
• Industrial Design • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI He-sen1(), CHEN Ying1, YAO Da-wei2
Received:
2023-06-16
Accepted:
2023-08-30
Online:
2023-12-31
Published:
2023-12-17
About author:
First author contact:LI He-sen (1980-), associate professor, Ph.D. His main research interests cover graphic information visualisation design, computer vision, etc. E-mail:86353874@qq.com
Supported by:
CLC Number:
LI He-sen, CHEN Ying, YAO Da-wei. Optimization design of operating state information of molded case circuit breaker based on eye tracking[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2023, 44(6): 1259-1266.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.txxb.com.cn/EN/10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2023061259
评估指标 | 含义及其与实验目标的相关性描述 |
---|---|
首次进入时间 | 注视点首次进入某AOI的时间;时间越短,表明该AOI越易引起被试者关注[ |
首次注视时长 | 注视点首次进入某AOI后停留的持续时间;时间越长,表明该AOI对于被试者的吸引力越强[ |
总注视时长 | 所有注视点落在某AOI的持续时间总和;时间越长,该AOI所受关注度越高[ |
主观量表 | 对断合闸符号视觉效果显著性强弱的主观评分,分值与满意度呈正相关 |
注视进度 | 可视化表达被试者对AOI的注视位置、注视时间、注视顺序的进度[ |
热点分布 | 可视化表达被试者对AOI的关注度等级[ |
Table 1 Description of assessment indicators
评估指标 | 含义及其与实验目标的相关性描述 |
---|---|
首次进入时间 | 注视点首次进入某AOI的时间;时间越短,表明该AOI越易引起被试者关注[ |
首次注视时长 | 注视点首次进入某AOI后停留的持续时间;时间越长,表明该AOI对于被试者的吸引力越强[ |
总注视时长 | 所有注视点落在某AOI的持续时间总和;时间越长,该AOI所受关注度越高[ |
主观量表 | 对断合闸符号视觉效果显著性强弱的主观评分,分值与满意度呈正相关 |
注视进度 | 可视化表达被试者对AOI的注视位置、注视时间、注视顺序的进度[ |
热点分布 | 可视化表达被试者对AOI的关注度等级[ |
属性 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I级 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
P (%) | 29.412 | 23.529 | 11.765 | 11.765 | 17.647 | 11.765 |
Table 4 Results of gaze progress analysis
属性 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I级 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
P (%) | 29.412 | 23.529 | 11.765 | 11.765 | 17.647 | 11.765 |
素材 | 首次进入 时间(s) | 首次注视 时长(s) | 总注视 时长(s) | 主观 评分 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | M | 2.639 | 0.203 | 2.877 | 3.891 |
SD | 0.451 | 0.029 | 0.501 | 0.573 | |
P2 | M | 2.197 | 0.206 | 2.894 | 3.929 |
SD | 0.373 | 0.031 | 0.492 | 0.633 | |
P3 | M | 2.109 | 0.137 | 2.776 | 3.831 |
SD | 0.361 | 0.027 | 0.451 | 0.629 | |
P4 | M | 2.733 | 0.134 | 3.119 | 3.641 |
SD | 0.443 | 0.019 | 0.491 | 0.599 | |
P5 | M | 2.931 | 0.171 | 3.023 | 3.709 |
SD | 0.441 | 0.031 | 0.511 | 0.651 | |
P6 | M | 2.853 | 0.167 | 3.092 | 3.683 |
SD | 0.466 | 0.028 | 0.524 | 0.643 |
Table 2 Mean and standard deviation of indicator data
素材 | 首次进入 时间(s) | 首次注视 时长(s) | 总注视 时长(s) | 主观 评分 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | M | 2.639 | 0.203 | 2.877 | 3.891 |
SD | 0.451 | 0.029 | 0.501 | 0.573 | |
P2 | M | 2.197 | 0.206 | 2.894 | 3.929 |
SD | 0.373 | 0.031 | 0.492 | 0.633 | |
P3 | M | 2.109 | 0.137 | 2.776 | 3.831 |
SD | 0.361 | 0.027 | 0.451 | 0.629 | |
P4 | M | 2.733 | 0.134 | 3.119 | 3.641 |
SD | 0.443 | 0.019 | 0.491 | 0.599 | |
P5 | M | 2.931 | 0.171 | 3.023 | 3.709 |
SD | 0.441 | 0.031 | 0.511 | 0.651 | |
P6 | M | 2.853 | 0.167 | 3.092 | 3.683 |
SD | 0.466 | 0.028 | 0.524 | 0.643 |
指标 | 首次进入 时间(s) | 首次注视 时长(s) | 总注视 时长(s) | 主观型 打分 |
---|---|---|---|---|
F | 2.993 | 1.364 | 1.528 | 0.934 |
P | 0.731 | 0.846 | 0.181 | 0.633 |
Table 3 The results of one-way ANOVA were evaluated
指标 | 首次进入 时间(s) | 首次注视 时长(s) | 总注视 时长(s) | 主观型 打分 |
---|---|---|---|---|
F | 2.993 | 1.364 | 1.528 | 0.934 |
P | 0.731 | 0.846 | 0.181 | 0.633 |
Fig. 7 Gaze progress analysis and color legend ((a) Materials P1; (b) Materials P2; (c) Materials P3; (d) Materials P4; (e) Materials P5; (f) Materials P6)
Fig. 8 Hot spot distribution of eye movement ((a) Materials P1; (b) Materials P2; (c) Materials P3; (d) Materials P4; (e) Materials P5; (f) Materials P6)
属性 | AOI-1 | AOI-2 | AOI-3 | 无效区域 |
---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 55.801 | 2.153 | 4.836 | 37.210 |
P2 | 56.442 | 3.809 | 18.923 | 20.826 |
P3 | 51.748 | - | 35.325 | 12.927 |
P4 | 54.285 | 2.159 | 28.829 | 14.727 |
P5 | 55.103 | 1.110 | 35.101 | 8.686 |
P6 | 54.384 | 0.562 | 14.019 | 31.035 |
Table 5 The proportion of total fixation time in AOIs (%)
属性 | AOI-1 | AOI-2 | AOI-3 | 无效区域 |
---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 55.801 | 2.153 | 4.836 | 37.210 |
P2 | 56.442 | 3.809 | 18.923 | 20.826 |
P3 | 51.748 | - | 35.325 | 12.927 |
P4 | 54.285 | 2.159 | 28.829 | 14.727 |
P5 | 55.103 | 1.110 | 35.101 | 8.686 |
P6 | 54.384 | 0.562 | 14.019 | 31.035 |
属性 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I级 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
II级 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 15 | 14 | 13 |
P (%) | 35.294 | 23.529 | 29.412 | 11.765 | 17.647 | 23.529 |
Table 6 Analysis results of hot spot data
属性 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I级 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
II级 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 15 | 14 | 13 |
P (%) | 35.294 | 23.529 | 29.412 | 11.765 | 17.647 | 23.529 |
样本 | 首次进入 时间(s) | 首次注视 时长(s) | 总注视 时长(s) | 主观型 打分 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
改进 方案 | M | 1.001 | 0.961 | 3.071 | 6.713 |
SD | 0.129 | 0.137 | 0.513 | 0.915 |
Table 7 Mean and standard deviation of indicator data about improvement
样本 | 首次进入 时间(s) | 首次注视 时长(s) | 总注视 时长(s) | 主观型 打分 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
改进 方案 | M | 1.001 | 0.961 | 3.071 | 6.713 |
SD | 0.129 | 0.137 | 0.513 | 0.915 |
指标 | 首次进入 时间(s) | 首次注视 时长(s) | 总注视 时长(s) | 主观型 打分 |
---|---|---|---|---|
F | 6.331 | 7.219 | 10.113 | 13.671 |
P | 0.046 | 0.033 | 0.019 | 0.027 |
Table 8 Results of one-way ANOVA about improvement
指标 | 首次进入 时间(s) | 首次注视 时长(s) | 总注视 时长(s) | 主观型 打分 |
---|---|---|---|---|
F | 6.331 | 7.219 | 10.113 | 13.671 |
P | 0.046 | 0.033 | 0.019 | 0.027 |
兴趣区 | 总注视时间占比(%) | 热点数据分析结果 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOI-1 | AOI-2 | AOI-3 | 无效 区域 | I级 | II级 | P (%) | |
改进 方案 | 65.201 | 17.664 | 10.023 | 7.112 | 14 | 3 | 82.353 |
Table 9 The proportion of total fixation time in AOIs
兴趣区 | 总注视时间占比(%) | 热点数据分析结果 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOI-1 | AOI-2 | AOI-3 | 无效 区域 | I级 | II级 | P (%) | |
改进 方案 | 65.201 | 17.664 | 10.023 | 7.112 | 14 | 3 | 82.353 |
[1] | 李和森, 柳冠中, 么大伟. 塑壳断路器人机交互方式改进设计[J]. 机械设计, 2022, 39(9): 142-147. |
LI H S, LIU G Z, YAO D W. Improved design of human- machine interaction mode of molded case circuit breaker[J]. Journal of Machine Design, 2022, 39(9): 142-147 (in Chinese). | |
[2] | 董世裕, 王军锋, 杨舒雨, 等. 基于眼动实验的核酸检测仪人机界面优化研究[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2021, 37(6): 190-195, 203. |
DONG S Y, WANG J F, YANG S Y, et al. Optimization of nucleic acid detector interface based on eye movement experiment[J]. Machine Design & Research, 2021, 37(6): 190-195, 203 (in Chinese). | |
[3] | 李翔, 冯绍虎. 基于眼动追踪的扫一扫界面可用性影响因素研究[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(6): 151-157. |
LI X, FENG S H. Factors affecting the usability of scan interface based on eye tracking[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44(6): 151-157 (in Chinese). | |
[4] | 吴磊, 苏瑶, 盛芹芹, 等. 基于眼动追踪的AR辅助装配指示符号影响机制研究[J]. 包装工程, 2022, 43(4): 45-51, 70. |
WU L, SU Y, SHENG Q Q, et al. Influence of augmented reality assembly indicators symbol based on eye tracking[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2022, 43(4): 45-51, 70 (in Chinese). | |
[5] | 江明尹, 李强, 王道雄, 等. 基于眼动和生理信号的放疗软件用户界面设计要素可用性研究[J]. 包装工程, 2022, 43(4): 163-168. |
JIANG M Y, LI Q, WANG D X, et al. Usability study of user interface design elements of radiotherapy software based on eye movement and physiological signals[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2022, 43(4): 163-168 (in Chinese). | |
[6] |
ZAHABI M, WANG Y S, SHAHRAMPOUR S. Classification of officers' driving situations based on eye-tracking and driver performance measures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 2021, 51(4): 394-402.
DOI URL |
[7] | 李和森, 柳冠中. 基于人机工程的智能塑壳断路器面板造型设计[J]. 机械设计, 2021, 38(5): 127-131. |
LI H S, LIU G Z. Panel modeling design of intelligent MCCB based on ergonomic[J]. Journal of Machine Design, 2021, 38(5): 127-131 (in Chinese). | |
[8] | 郭东威, 丁根宏. 群组决策主观评分型竞赛名次的优化模型[J]. 工程数学学报, 2022, 39(3): 379-388. |
GUO D W, DING G H. Optimization model of group decision-making for subjective scoring competition ranking[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 2022, 39(3): 379-388 (in Chinese). | |
[9] | AZAD-KHANEGHAH P, NEUBAUER N, MIGUEL CRUZ A, et al. Mobile health app usability and quality rating scales: a systematic review[EB/OL]. [2023-01-13]. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1701103. |
[10] | 李和森. 智能低压电器人机界面可用性评估研究[D]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2023. |
LI H S. Usability evaluation of human-machine interface on intelligent low voltage apparatus[D]. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Technology, 2023 (in Chinese). | |
[11] | KUO J Y, CHEN C H, KOYAMA S, et al. Investigating the relationship between users' eye movements and perceived product attributes in design concept evaluation[EB/OL]. [2023-01-13]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103393. |
[12] |
ZHOU W, FAN Y, CHANG Y L, et al. Pathogenesis of comorbid ADHD and Chinese developmental dyslexia: evidence from eye-movement tracking and rapid automatized naming[J]. Journal of Attention Disorders, 2023, 27(3): 294-306.
DOI URL |
[13] | ANA R, PAVEL Ž, REBECA A, et al. How eye tracking can predict consumer behaviour preferences on mobile devices[J]. Applied Marketing Analytics, 2023, 8(3): 239-254. |
[14] | FIGUEIREDO G R, RIPKA W L, ROMANELI E F R, et al. Attentional bias for emotional faces in depressed and non-depressed individuals: an eye-tracking study[C]// 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. New York: IEEE Press, 2019: 5419-5422. |
[15] |
DIEGO C G, FRANCISCO L M, FRANCISCO C L, et al. The effect of consumer concern for the environment, self-regulatory focus and message framing on green advertising effectiveness: an eye tracking study[J]. Environmental Communication, 2021, 15(6): 813-841.
DOI URL |
[16] |
SUN Q Q, WANG P, SHI S. The round baler modeling design based on unconscious quantification[J]. Applied Nanoscience, 2023, 13: 2419-2430.
DOI |
[17] |
BERNI A, MACCIONI L, BORGIANNI Y. Observing pictures and videos of creative products: an eye tracking study[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10: 1480.
DOI URL |
[18] | ZHAO S, CHENG S W. Adaptive navigation assistance based on eye movement features in virtual reality[J]. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 2023, 5(3): 232-248. |
[19] | 杨坤, 杜晶. 基于眼动指标的平视显示器字符颜色对平视显示器和下视显示器相容性影响分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2018, 18(14): 96-101. |
YANG K, DU J. Analyses on the influences of head up display character color on head up display and head down display compatibility based on eye movement index[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2018, 18(14): 96-101 (in Chinese). | |
[20] |
WEI J. The adoption of repeated measurement of variance analysis and Shapiro-Wilk test[J]. Frontiers of Medicine, 2022, 16(4): 659-660.
DOI |
[1] | TANG Peng, SA Guo-dong, LIU Zhen-yu, TAN Jian-rong. Design of digital twin system for forging hydraulic press [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2023, 44(3): 609-615. |
[2] | SHAO Xu-qiang, CHENG Ya , JIN Yi-zhong. A review of the application of illustrative methods in 3D streamline visualization [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2022, 43(5): 753-764. |
[3] | LIU Nan-shan, PEI Yun-qiang, JIANG Hao, HAN Yong-guo, WU Ya-dong, WANG Fu-pan, YI Si-heng . WebAR garbage classification information visualization method based on VD-MobileNet network [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2022, 43(4): 667-676. |
[4] | ZHANG Qing-hui, CHEN Yi, WU Cai-xia. A visual analysis approach for domain literature data based on word representation model [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2022, 43(4): 685-694. |
[5] | XIONG Chen, CHEN Li-bin, LI Lin-ze, XU Zhen, ZHAO Yang-ping. Crack visualization management method based on computer vision and BIM [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2022, 43(4): 721-728. |
[6] |
LI Xiao-ying, YU Ya-ping.
Research on interactive design of children’s sound and painting based on multimodal sensory experience
[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2022, 43(4): 736-743.
|
[7] | LI Zhong-wei, XU Bin, LI Yong, GONG Kai-xuan, LIU Ge-ge. Visualization of ocean flow field based on unstructured triangular mesh [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2022, 43(3): 486-495. |
[8] | BIAN Gen-qing, CHEN Wei-tao. Research on web-oriented visualization method of 3D architectural model [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2021, 42(5): 823-832. |
[9] | PEI Yun-qiang , WU Ya-dong , WANG Fu-pan , ZHANG Xiao-rong , JIANG Hong-yu , XU Shi-jian , TANG Wen-sheng. IV LKWA: an information visual analysis tool with advanced L-K optical flow based WebAR [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2020, 41(6): 962-969. |
[10] | SHAO Xu-qiang, LIU Yi-lin, YANG Yan, LIN Li-na. A review of vortex feature extraction methods for fluid [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2020, 41(5): 687-701. |
[11] | LI Zhi, CAI Dong-na . Holographic Visualization and Interactive System Realization of Digital Flower Plants [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2019, 40(6): 1017-1023. |
[12] | ZHAO Jing-jie, ZHAO Rui-bin, PANG Ming-yong . An Algorithm for Visualizing Implicit Curves with Sharp Features [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2019, 40(2): 373-378. |
[13] | LU Qiang1,4, ZHANG Hai-bo1, YUAN Xiao-hui2, CHEN Chen3,4 . A Method for Visual Analysis of Urban Power Supply Data Based on Power Line Layout Optimization [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2019, 40(1): 24-31. |
[14] | ZHANG Ye, WANG Song, WU Ya-dong . FMR: A Fast Multilevel Algorithm Based on FR [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2019, 40(1): 78-86. |
[15] | CHEN Bingkun, ZHOU Hong . Uncertainty Network Visualization Method Based on Multilevel Graph Layout Algorithm [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2018, 39(6): 1130-1138. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||