Welcome to Journal of Graphics share: 

Journal of Graphics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 179-193.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026010179

• Digital Design and Manufacture • Previous Articles     Next Articles

MBSE-based conceptual design method for complex forming equipment

WANG Boya1,2, WANG Shaozong1,2(), YANG Wanran1,2, ZHOU Xingwei3, HOU Liang3, XIONG Chengyue1,2   

  1. 1 Beijing National Innovation Institute of Lightweight Ltd, Beijing 101407, China
    2 State Key Laboratory of Advanced Forming Technology and Equipment, China Academy of Machinery Science and Technology, Beijing 101407, China
    3 Pen-Tung Sah Institute of Micro-Nano Science and Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen Fujian 361102, China
  • Received:2025-06-19 Accepted:2025-09-15 Online:2026-02-28 Published:2026-03-16
  • Contact: WANG Shaozong
  • Supported by:
    National Science and Technology Major Project of China(112405Q)

Abstract:

The traditional development approach for complex forming equipment typically relies on Document-Based Systems Engineering (DBSE), which often leads to issues such as protracted development cycles due to inadequate requirement analysis, incomplete requirement coverage caused by textual ambiguity, and equipment development delays lagging behind technological iterations. These shortcomings frequently result in final designs that fail to meet target performance metrics and require inefficient, repetitive modifications. Therefore, in the conceptual design stage of complex forming equipment, and drawing on the U.S. Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) combined with Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE), an MBSE-based conceptual-design method for complex forming equipment was proposed. This method utilized five viewpoints, including panoramic viewpoint, capability viewpoint, operational viewpoint, systems viewpoint, and standards viewpoint, as entry points for the conceptual design of complex forming equipment. Through multi-perspective analysis, the method performed top-level requirements acquisition, requirements refinement analysis, functional analysis, and system modeling across four design levels. Eleven types of models were established using the Systems Modeling Language (SysML), enabling digital and procedural expression in the conceptual design stage of complex forming equipment. Finally, superplastic-forming equipment was used as a representative example to demonstrate the application of this design method. The application of the method addressed the shortcomings of traditional design approaches and demonstrated that the method provided effective guidance for the forward development of complex forming equipment.

Key words: complex forming equipment, MBSE, DoDAF, SysML, conceptual design method

CLC Number: