Welcome to Journal of Graphics

Journal of Graphics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 616-628.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026030616

• Computer Graphics and Virtual Reality • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Motion capture data recovery by combining zero-norm sparsity and temporal difference low rank

HU Wenyu1,2, XU Hao1, QIU Xiwen1, YI Yun1,2()   

  1. 1 School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou Jiangxi 341000, China
    2 Key Laboratory of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence of Jiangxi Education Institutes, Ganzhou Jiangxi 341000, China
  • Received:2025-11-03 Accepted:2026-03-27 Online:2026-06-30 Published:2026-06-30
  • Contact: YI Yun
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(62266002);National Natural Science Foundation of China(62362003);Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province(20252BAC250007);Postgraduate Innovation Fund Project of Gannan Normal University(YCXJ24-A12)

Abstract:

To address the prevalent noise interference and missing-marker problem during the collection and transmission of Motion Capture (MoCap) data, a recovery model combining the Zero-norm sparsity and Temporal Differential Low-rank minimization (ZTDL) was proposed. Firstly, a temporal difference low-rank regularization term was introduced to capture the global low-rank property and temporal smoothness of MoCap data. Besides, the l0 norm and the Frobenius norm were employed to characterize sparse missing noise and additive Gaussian noise. Secondly, the non-convex recovery model was transformed into the optimization problem involving a binary mask matrix by exploiting the properties of the l0 norm. This model enabled the simultaneous estimation of missing regions and the restoration of MoCap data. The optimization problem was efficiently solved using the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) framework sand the (inverse) Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT/IDCT). The algorithm was rigorously proven to converge to a local minimum in a coordinate-wise manner in theory. Finally, extensive comparative experiments were conducted on the benchmark CMU and HDM05 datasets. The ZTDL algorithm was evaluated against a range of classical methods such as TSMC, TRNN, IRNN-Lp, and TSPN, as well as deep learning approaches. The restoration results, including recovery error and visual effect, demonstrated the significant superiority of ZTDL in both missing-region estimation and corrupted-data restoration.

Key words: motion capture data, temporal difference, sparse and low-rank, non-convex optimization, zero-norm

CLC Number: