图学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 834-843.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026040834
收稿日期:2026-01-07
接受日期:2026-05-11
出版日期:2026-08-31
发布日期:2026-08-31
通讯作者:刘利刚,E-mail:lgliu@ustc.edu.cn基金资助:Received:2026-01-07
Accepted:2026-05-11
Published:2026-08-31
Online:2026-08-31
Contact:
LIU Ligang,E-mail:lgliu@ustc.edu.cnSupported by:摘要:
路径规划是机器人领域的重要研究内容。在实际应用中,机器人常需要遍历访问多个目标点,而获取最优遍历次序的关键,在于高效计算目标点之间的路径代价并构建邻接矩阵,从而构造旅行商问题进行求解。概率路线图因具备多次查询优势,适用于邻接矩阵的计算,但存在精度与效率难以兼顾的矛盾:高采样率的概率路线图可获取精准路径代价,却伴随极大的计算耗时;低采样率计算高效,却无法保证路径质量。针对这个问题,提出了一种层次概率路线图,以不同的精度计算各目标点对间的路径代价。该方法主要分为2个阶段:初计算阶段,在低采样率的概率路线图上初步规划出所有点对之间的路径,得到初始邻接矩阵;重计算阶段,选取对遍历次序求解敏感的部分点对,在高采样率的概率路线图上精确地规划其路径并更新邻接矩阵。最后构造出相应的旅行商问题并求解出最优遍历次序,依次将目标点用路径连接起来得到全局遍历路径。为合理地选取重计算点对,提出了自适应选取策略,融合依路径代价和依目标点聚类2种子策略。以目标点的最佳聚类数为判别依据,使用阈值判定目标点集的空间分布情况,并自动选取相应的子策略。在多种仿真环境下进行对比试验,验证了自适应策略的有效性。与已有方法相比,该算法生成的路径代价减小0.5%~1.0%,计算耗时减少20%~40%,具备更高的计算效率。
中图分类号:
尹思琪, 刘利刚. 基于层次概率路线图的多目标点路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(4): 834-843.
YIN Siqi, LIU Ligang. Multi-goal path planning based on hierarchical probabilistic roadmaps[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(4): 834-843.
| 算例 | Angle A*[ | SOM[ | IST*[ | FMF[ | SFF*[ | 本文算法 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | |
| 2D-Sparse-20 | 6.94 | 2.95 | 7.63 | 1.28 | 6.30 | 1.95 | 4.51 | 2.49 | 4.33 | 2.29 | 3.76 | 1.68 |
| 2D-Sparse-40 | 7.55 | 3.82 | 7.32 | 1.52 | 5.88 | 2.62 | 4.96 | 3.34 | 4.48 | 2.87 | 3.99 | 2.33 |
| 2D-Sparse-60 | 5.86 | 5.09 | 6.96 | 1.66 | 6.23 | 2.77 | 5.03 | 5.29 | 4.60 | 3.25 | 4.01 | 2.66 |
| 2D-Medium-20 | 7.53 | 4.02 | 7.80 | 1.63 | 5.92 | 2.35 | 4.86 | 3.55 | 4.47 | 2.97 | 3.66 | 2.62 |
| 2D-Medium-40 | 7.25 | 4.39 | 6.79 | 1.55 | 6.19 | 2.49 | 5.10 | 3.53 | 4.44 | 3.11 | 3.49 | 2.51 |
| 2D-Medium-60 | 6.77 | 3.42 | 7.35 | 1.69 | 5.52 | 2.56 | 5.11 | 3.21 | 4.40 | 2.78 | 3.97 | 2.49 |
| 2D-Dense-20 | 6.47 | 3.00 | 7.29 | 1.10 | 6.50 | 1.93 | 4.92 | 2.37 | 4.41 | 2.08 | 4.83 | 1.85 |
| 2D-Dense-40 | 6.07 | 4.14 | 7.00 | 1.21 | 6.38 | 2.20 | 4.59 | 4.38 | 4.07 | 3.08 | 3.94 | 2.89 |
| 2D-Dense-60 | 7.15 | 4.62 | 6.68 | 2.09 | 6.32 | 2.81 | 4.65 | 4.09 | 4.58 | 4.62 | 3.67 | 3.01 |
| 3D-Sparse-20 | 7.10 | 9.80 | 7.63 | 4.16 | 7.49 | 5.91 | 5.72 | 11.28 | 5.90 | 8.78 | 5.72 | 7.68 |
| 3D-Sparse-40 | 6.74 | 14.83 | 8.15 | 5.28 | 7.02 | 9.83 | 5.63 | 17.98 | 5.38 | 10.12 | 5.18 | 8.89 |
| 3D-Sparse-60 | 8.29 | 19.31 | 7.84 | 10.41 | 7.28 | 9.40 | 5.67 | 19.32 | 5.88 | 11.44 | 5.14 | 9.30 |
| 3D-Medium-20 | 8.08 | 13.77 | 8.54 | 4.29 | 7.23 | 7.40 | 6.02 | 11.42 | 5.38 | 8.88 | 5.25 | 8.77 |
| 3D-Medium-40 | 8.17 | 14.69 | 8.08 | 6.92 | 7.18 | 10.40 | 6.23 | 14.83 | 5.81 | 11.65 | 4.68 | 9.68 |
| 3D-Medium-60 | 8.01 | 19.62 | 8.69 | 9.82 | 6.90 | 11.50 | 5.84 | 20.63 | 5.46 | 15.80 | 4.73 | 11.11 |
| 3D-Dense-20 | 7.52 | 13.18 | 8.55 | 4.89 | 6.87 | 6.67 | 5.88 | 10.92 | 5.43 | 10.72 | 5.67 | 8.65 |
| 3D-Dense-40 | 7.46 | 18.33 | 8.34 | 7.17 | 7.10 | 8.86 | 6.26 | 13.97 | 5.27 | 10.07 | 4.94 | 9.84 |
| 3D-Dense-60 | 8.40 | 20.86 | 7.83 | 10.76 | 6.85 | 9.95 | 6.24 | 18.38 | 5.20 | 12.69 | 4.74 | 10.55 |
| 6D-Sparse-20 | 8.20 | 21.25 | 9.74 | 7.04 | 8.38 | 12.20 | 6.96 | 27.35 | 6.25 | 20.61 | 6.13 | 15.20 |
| 6D-Sparse-40 | 9.29 | 40.62 | 8.84 | 14.08 | 8.58 | 19.36 | 7.17 | 35.14 | 6.58 | 26.49 | 5.57 | 23.68 |
| 6D-Sparse-60 | 9.24 | 43.18 | 9.70 | 14.84 | 7.53 | 30.64 | 7.02 | 38.17 | 6.63 | 35.70 | 5.53 | 25.82 |
| 6D-Medium-20 | 9.37 | 20.47 | 8.79 | 7.48 | 8.09 | 11.62 | 6.73 | 25.56 | 6.56 | 18.09 | 5.89 | 14.44 |
| 6D-Medium-40 | 8.61 | 38.01 | 8.99 | 12.96 | 7.60 | 18.14 | 6.95 | 34.86 | 6.01 | 28.63 | 6.04 | 23.69 |
| 6D-Medium-60 | 8.90 | 43.71 | 8.61 | 16.22 | 8.38 | 30.68 | 6.66 | 40.81 | 6.67 | 32.44 | 5.72 | 27.68 |
| 6D-Dense-20 | 9.59 | 19.38 | 9.33 | 7.79 | 8.59 | 11.83 | 6.70 | 31.08 | 6.74 | 19.05 | 5.63 | 16.98 |
| 6D-Dense-40 | 8.48 | 35.69 | 8.73 | 13.08 | 7.57 | 16.38 | 6.96 | 34.22 | 6.62 | 25.11 | 5.74 | 22.18 |
| 6D-Dense-60 | 7.63 | 41.57 | 8.56 | 17.54 | 8.53 | 30.04 | 6.86 | 43.03 | 6.03 | 38.96 | 5.65 | 29.80 |
表1 多场景下,本文算法与其他主流方法的性能对比
Table 1 Comparisons of our method and other mainstream methods in multiple scenarios
| 算例 | Angle A*[ | SOM[ | IST*[ | FMF[ | SFF*[ | 本文算法 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | |
| 2D-Sparse-20 | 6.94 | 2.95 | 7.63 | 1.28 | 6.30 | 1.95 | 4.51 | 2.49 | 4.33 | 2.29 | 3.76 | 1.68 |
| 2D-Sparse-40 | 7.55 | 3.82 | 7.32 | 1.52 | 5.88 | 2.62 | 4.96 | 3.34 | 4.48 | 2.87 | 3.99 | 2.33 |
| 2D-Sparse-60 | 5.86 | 5.09 | 6.96 | 1.66 | 6.23 | 2.77 | 5.03 | 5.29 | 4.60 | 3.25 | 4.01 | 2.66 |
| 2D-Medium-20 | 7.53 | 4.02 | 7.80 | 1.63 | 5.92 | 2.35 | 4.86 | 3.55 | 4.47 | 2.97 | 3.66 | 2.62 |
| 2D-Medium-40 | 7.25 | 4.39 | 6.79 | 1.55 | 6.19 | 2.49 | 5.10 | 3.53 | 4.44 | 3.11 | 3.49 | 2.51 |
| 2D-Medium-60 | 6.77 | 3.42 | 7.35 | 1.69 | 5.52 | 2.56 | 5.11 | 3.21 | 4.40 | 2.78 | 3.97 | 2.49 |
| 2D-Dense-20 | 6.47 | 3.00 | 7.29 | 1.10 | 6.50 | 1.93 | 4.92 | 2.37 | 4.41 | 2.08 | 4.83 | 1.85 |
| 2D-Dense-40 | 6.07 | 4.14 | 7.00 | 1.21 | 6.38 | 2.20 | 4.59 | 4.38 | 4.07 | 3.08 | 3.94 | 2.89 |
| 2D-Dense-60 | 7.15 | 4.62 | 6.68 | 2.09 | 6.32 | 2.81 | 4.65 | 4.09 | 4.58 | 4.62 | 3.67 | 3.01 |
| 3D-Sparse-20 | 7.10 | 9.80 | 7.63 | 4.16 | 7.49 | 5.91 | 5.72 | 11.28 | 5.90 | 8.78 | 5.72 | 7.68 |
| 3D-Sparse-40 | 6.74 | 14.83 | 8.15 | 5.28 | 7.02 | 9.83 | 5.63 | 17.98 | 5.38 | 10.12 | 5.18 | 8.89 |
| 3D-Sparse-60 | 8.29 | 19.31 | 7.84 | 10.41 | 7.28 | 9.40 | 5.67 | 19.32 | 5.88 | 11.44 | 5.14 | 9.30 |
| 3D-Medium-20 | 8.08 | 13.77 | 8.54 | 4.29 | 7.23 | 7.40 | 6.02 | 11.42 | 5.38 | 8.88 | 5.25 | 8.77 |
| 3D-Medium-40 | 8.17 | 14.69 | 8.08 | 6.92 | 7.18 | 10.40 | 6.23 | 14.83 | 5.81 | 11.65 | 4.68 | 9.68 |
| 3D-Medium-60 | 8.01 | 19.62 | 8.69 | 9.82 | 6.90 | 11.50 | 5.84 | 20.63 | 5.46 | 15.80 | 4.73 | 11.11 |
| 3D-Dense-20 | 7.52 | 13.18 | 8.55 | 4.89 | 6.87 | 6.67 | 5.88 | 10.92 | 5.43 | 10.72 | 5.67 | 8.65 |
| 3D-Dense-40 | 7.46 | 18.33 | 8.34 | 7.17 | 7.10 | 8.86 | 6.26 | 13.97 | 5.27 | 10.07 | 4.94 | 9.84 |
| 3D-Dense-60 | 8.40 | 20.86 | 7.83 | 10.76 | 6.85 | 9.95 | 6.24 | 18.38 | 5.20 | 12.69 | 4.74 | 10.55 |
| 6D-Sparse-20 | 8.20 | 21.25 | 9.74 | 7.04 | 8.38 | 12.20 | 6.96 | 27.35 | 6.25 | 20.61 | 6.13 | 15.20 |
| 6D-Sparse-40 | 9.29 | 40.62 | 8.84 | 14.08 | 8.58 | 19.36 | 7.17 | 35.14 | 6.58 | 26.49 | 5.57 | 23.68 |
| 6D-Sparse-60 | 9.24 | 43.18 | 9.70 | 14.84 | 7.53 | 30.64 | 7.02 | 38.17 | 6.63 | 35.70 | 5.53 | 25.82 |
| 6D-Medium-20 | 9.37 | 20.47 | 8.79 | 7.48 | 8.09 | 11.62 | 6.73 | 25.56 | 6.56 | 18.09 | 5.89 | 14.44 |
| 6D-Medium-40 | 8.61 | 38.01 | 8.99 | 12.96 | 7.60 | 18.14 | 6.95 | 34.86 | 6.01 | 28.63 | 6.04 | 23.69 |
| 6D-Medium-60 | 8.90 | 43.71 | 8.61 | 16.22 | 8.38 | 30.68 | 6.66 | 40.81 | 6.67 | 32.44 | 5.72 | 27.68 |
| 6D-Dense-20 | 9.59 | 19.38 | 9.33 | 7.79 | 8.59 | 11.83 | 6.70 | 31.08 | 6.74 | 19.05 | 5.63 | 16.98 |
| 6D-Dense-40 | 8.48 | 35.69 | 8.73 | 13.08 | 7.57 | 16.38 | 6.96 | 34.22 | 6.62 | 25.11 | 5.74 | 22.18 |
| 6D-Dense-60 | 7.63 | 41.57 | 8.56 | 17.54 | 8.53 | 30.04 | 6.86 | 43.03 | 6.03 | 38.96 | 5.65 | 29.80 |
| 问题规模 | 策略A | 策略B | 策略C | 策略D | 策略E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 0.72 | 0.49 | 0.87 |
| 20 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 0.45 | 1.05 |
| 30 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 1.07 | 1.13 | 1.53 |
| 40 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 1.08 | 1.83 | 2.10 |
| 50 | 0.08 | 1.20 | 1.23 | 2.39 | 3.06 |
| 60 | 0.01 | 0.70 | 0.91 | 2.55 | 2.90 |
| 70 | 0.01 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 2.57 | 2.95 |
| 80 | 0.02 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 3.19 | 3.69 |
表2 目标点分布均匀时求解质量(Gap)对比/%
Table 2 Comparisons of solution quality when goals are uniformly distributed/%
| 问题规模 | 策略A | 策略B | 策略C | 策略D | 策略E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 0.72 | 0.49 | 0.87 |
| 20 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 0.45 | 1.05 |
| 30 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 1.07 | 1.13 | 1.53 |
| 40 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 1.08 | 1.83 | 2.10 |
| 50 | 0.08 | 1.20 | 1.23 | 2.39 | 3.06 |
| 60 | 0.01 | 0.70 | 0.91 | 2.55 | 2.90 |
| 70 | 0.01 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 2.57 | 2.95 |
| 80 | 0.02 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 3.19 | 3.69 |
| 问题规模 | 策略A | 策略B | 策略C | 策略D | 策略E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 2.12 | 2.26 | 2.31 | 2.33 | 2.62 |
| 20 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 2.16 | 1.93 |
| 30 | 1.13 | 0.10 | 1.09 | 1.21 | 1.83 |
| 40 | 1.52 | 0.73 | 1.24 | 2.50 | 2.75 |
| 50 | 1.01 | 0.83 | 1.34 | 2.62 | 3.14 |
| 60 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 1.10 | 2.46 | 2.87 |
| 70 | 2.76 | 0.73 | 2.40 | 3.89 | 5.27 |
| 80 | 1.42 | 0.59 | 1.46 | 3.66 | 4.90 |
表3 目标点相对聚集时求解质量(Gap)对比/%
Table 3 Comparisons of solution quality when goals are relatively clustered/%
| 问题规模 | 策略A | 策略B | 策略C | 策略D | 策略E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 2.12 | 2.26 | 2.31 | 2.33 | 2.62 |
| 20 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 2.16 | 1.93 |
| 30 | 1.13 | 0.10 | 1.09 | 1.21 | 1.83 |
| 40 | 1.52 | 0.73 | 1.24 | 2.50 | 2.75 |
| 50 | 1.01 | 0.83 | 1.34 | 2.62 | 3.14 |
| 60 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 1.10 | 2.46 | 2.87 |
| 70 | 2.76 | 0.73 | 2.40 | 3.89 | 5.27 |
| 80 | 1.42 | 0.59 | 1.46 | 3.66 | 4.90 |
| 算例 | 初计算 | 重计算 | 初计算+重计算 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2D-Sparse-40 | 7.44 | 6.51 | 3.99 |
| 2D-Medium-40 | 7.75 | 5.18 | 3.69 |
| 2D-Dense-40 | 8.33 | 6.75 | 3.94 |
| 3D-Sparse-40 | 8.94 | 6.40 | 5.18 |
| 3D-Medium-40 | 7.84 | 5.94 | 4.68 |
| 3D-Dense-40 | 11.45 | 9.52 | 4.94 |
| 6D-Sparse-40 | 10.29 | 9.24 | 5.57 |
| 6D-Medium-40 | 8.77 | 6.69 | 6.04 |
| 6D-Dense-40 | 11.50 | 8.58 | 5.74 |
表4 对初计算和重计算的消融实验(Gap/%)
Table 4 Ablation study on initial planning and refinement planning (Gap/%)
| 算例 | 初计算 | 重计算 | 初计算+重计算 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2D-Sparse-40 | 7.44 | 6.51 | 3.99 |
| 2D-Medium-40 | 7.75 | 5.18 | 3.69 |
| 2D-Dense-40 | 8.33 | 6.75 | 3.94 |
| 3D-Sparse-40 | 8.94 | 6.40 | 5.18 |
| 3D-Medium-40 | 7.84 | 5.94 | 4.68 |
| 3D-Dense-40 | 11.45 | 9.52 | 4.94 |
| 6D-Sparse-40 | 10.29 | 9.24 | 5.57 |
| 6D-Medium-40 | 8.77 | 6.69 | 6.04 |
| 6D-Dense-40 | 11.50 | 8.58 | 5.74 |
| [1] |
AIT SAADI A, SOUKANE A, MERAIHI Y, et al. UAV path planning using optimization approaches: a survey[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2022, 29(6): 4233-4284.
DOI |
| [2] |
SÁNCHEZ-IBÁÑEZ J R, PÉREZ-DEL-PULGAR C J, GARCÍA-CEREZO A. Path planning for autonomous mobile robots: a review[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(23): 7898.
DOI URL |
| [3] | 刘清云, 游雄, 张欣, 等. 移动机器人路径规划算法综述[J]. 计算机科学, 2025, 52(S1): 147-156. |
| LIU Q Y, YOU X, ZHANG X, et al. Review of path planning algorithms for mobile robots[J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(S1): 147-156 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] |
贾明超, 冯斌, 吴鹏, 等. 一种融合改进A*算法与改进动态窗口法的文旅服务机器人路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2024, 45(3): 505-515.
DOI |
|
JIA M C, FENG B, WU P, et al. A path planning for cultural tourism service robot combining improved A* algorithm and improved dynamic window approach[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2024, 45(3): 505-515 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [5] | 马天, 杨秦, 李占利. 基于改进多粒子群的牙齿正畸路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2021, 42(4): 615-622. |
|
MA T, YANG Q, LI Z L. Orthodontic path planning based on improved multi-PSO[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2021, 42(4): 615-622 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [6] |
孙瑞, 张文胜. 基于改进蚁群算法的移动机器人平滑路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2019, 40(2): 344-350.
DOI |
|
SUN R, ZHANG W S. Smooth path planning of mobile robot based on improved ant colony algorithm[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2019, 40(2): 344-350 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [7] |
SUI J, DING S Z, HUANG X L, et al. A survey on deep learning-based algorithms for the traveling salesman problem[J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2025, 19(6): 196322.
DOI |
| [8] |
POP P C, COSMA O, SABO C, et al. A comprehensive survey on the generalized traveling salesman problem[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2024, 314(3): 819-835.
DOI URL |
| [9] | SAHA M, SANCHEZ-ANTE G, LATOMBE J C. Planning multi-goal tours for robot arms[C]// 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. New York: IEEE Press, 2003: 3797-3803. |
| [10] | BEST G, FAIGL J, FITCH R. Multi-robot path planning for budgeted active perception with self-organising maps[C]// 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. New York: IEEE Press, 2016: 3164-3171. |
| [11] | DAVIS B R, BRAY E, BEST G. Multi-goal path planning in cluttered environments with PRM-guided self-organising maps[C]// 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. New York: IEEE Press, 2024: 10746-10753. |
| [12] | HUANG Y, GU K R, LEE H H. S&Reg: end-to-end learning- based model for multi-goal path planning problem[C]// The 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. New York: IEEE Press, 2023: 647-653. |
| [13] |
HUANG Y, ZHANG Y L. S&Regv2: a probabilistically complete sampling-based planner to solve multi-goal path finding problem via multi-task learning networks[J]. Advanced Robotics, 2024, 38(23): 1668-1678.
DOI URL |
| [14] | VONÁSEK V, PĚNIČKA R. Space-filling forest for multi-goal path planning[C]// The 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. New York: IEEE Press, 2019: 1587-1590. |
| [15] |
JANOŠ J, VONÁSEK V, PĚNIČKA R. Multi-goal path planning using multiple random trees[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2021, 6(2): 4201-4208.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
GIANG T T C, BINH H T T, LUONG H V D, et al. Fast marching firework method for multi-goal mobile robot path planning in complex obstacle maps[J]. Intelligent Service Robotics, 2025, 18(6): 1467-1484.
DOI |
| [17] |
CHANDAK N, CHOUR K, RATHINAM S, et al. Informed Steiner trees: sampling and pruning for multi-goal path finding in high dimensions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2024, 21(4): 5048-5061.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
ALLUS A, UNEL M. Angle-based multi-goal ordering and path-planning using an improved A-star algorithm[J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2025, 190: 105001.
DOI URL |
| [19] | WANG H D, XIONG X G, ZHOU H X, et al. Time-varying multi-goal path planning with multi-tree RRT* algorithm for quadruped robots[C]// The 18th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision. New York: IEEE Press, 2024: 543-548. |
| [20] | LU Y J, DAS D, PLAKU E, et al. Multi-goal motion memory[C]// 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. New York: IEEE Press, 2025: 8864-8871. |
| [21] | KRONEMAN W, VALENTE J, VAN DER STAPPEN A F. A fast two-stage approach for multi-goal path planning in a fruit tree[C]// 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. New York: IEEE Press, 2023: 1586-1593. |
| [22] | HELSGAUN K. An extension of the Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun TSP solver for constrained traveling salesman and vehicle routing problems: technical report[R]. Roskilde: Roskilde University, 2017. |
| [23] |
ROMANUKE V. Traveling salesman problem parallelization by solving clustered subproblems[J]. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 2023, 48(4): 453-481.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
ARORA P, DEEPALI N, VARSHNEY S. Analysis of K-Means and K-Medoids algorithm for big data[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2016, 78: 507-512.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
FAIGL J, VÁŇA P, DECKEROVÁ J. Fast heuristics for the 3D multi-goal path planning based on the generalized traveling salesman problem with neighborhoods[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2019, 4(3): 2439-2446.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 刘畅, 马鸿宇, 申立勇, 袁春明, 张博文, 李世初. 新型二段式高效粗加工刀具路径生成[J]. 图学学报, 2025, 46(6): 1183-1190. |
| [2] | 胡悦, 孙智达, 黄惠. 面向无人机路径规划的可视分析系统[J]. 图学学报, 2025, 46(3): 655-665. |
| [3] | 贾明超, 冯斌, 吴鹏, 张坤, 桑胜举. 一种融合改进A*算法与改进动态窗口法的文旅服务机器人路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2024, 45(3): 505-515. |
| [4] | 丁建川, 肖金桐, 赵可新, 贾冬青, 崔炳德, 杨鑫. 基于脉冲神经网络的复杂场景导航避障算法[J]. 图学学报, 2023, 44(6): 1121-1129. |
| [5] | 马鸿宇 , 申立勇 , 姜 鑫 , 邹 强 , 袁春明 . 数控加工中路径规划与速度插补综述[J]. 图学学报, 2022, 43(6): 967-986. |
| [6] | 邓洋洋, 李维诗. 薄壁件选择性激光熔融的分区扫描路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2022, 43(1): 149-155. |
| [7] | 马 天, 杨 秦, 李占利. 基于改进多粒子群的牙齿正畸路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2021, 42(4): 615-622. |
| [8] | 李占利, 刘童鑫, 李洪安, 孙志浩. 隐形矫治方案中的牙齿运动路径规划方法研究[J]. 图学学报, 2020, 41(4): 556-566. |
| [9] | 胡 鹏, 李 琳, 杨 晶, 刘晓平 . 结合深度图与美学评估的古建筑场景路径规划方法研究[J]. 图学学报, 2019, 40(6): 1032-1037. |
| [10] | 孙 瑞, 张文胜. 基于改进蚁群算法的移动机器人平滑路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2019, 40(2): 344-350. |
| [11] | 刘嘉玮, 陈双敏, 王晓丽, 辛士庆. 三维打印中喷头的最优路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2017, 38(1): 34-38. |
| [12] | 王枫红, 邓志燕, 陈炽坤. 基于传统遗传算法的改进排爆机器人路径规划研究[J]. 图学学报, 2012, 33(3): 41-45. |
| [13] | 胡胜红. 对面域作图的DXF文件优化激光加工路径[J]. 图学学报, 2010, 31(6): 106-110. |
| [14] | 康 亮, 赵春霞, 郭剑辉. 未知环境下基于三次螺线Bug算法的移动机器人路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2010, 31(1): 30-38. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
