Reflections on the orientation and development of
engineering graphics in the era of computing

doi:10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2023010194

Abstract

Abstract:

On the basis of the two development reports on graphics, the inheritance of the science and discipline of engineering graphics was particularly discussed, and its orientation and development in the computing era were also explored. The theories, methods, and technologies of engineering graphics, as well as descriptive geometry, were reviewed, revealing the rigorous theories and scientific values implied in its unambiguous expression and engineering computing. In the computing era, discussions were conducted on some new forms that have found their way from engineering graphics to computer graphics. The commonalities of these two major branches of graphics were analyzed, especially their supporting role for CAD regarding graphic thinking and computational thinking. With these common foundations as the core, the engineering application as the guide, and scientific research and talent training as the goal, explorations were pursued on the establishment of a disciplinary development framework for engineering graphics integrating with multiple thinking modes.

Key words:

"> graphics, engineering graphics, descriptive geometry, graphics computing thinking, common foundation

CLC Number:

TH 126

YU Hai-yan , LIU Yan-cong , HE Yuan-jun.

Reflections on the orientation and development of engineering graphics in the era of computing

[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2023, 44(1): 194-198.

References

[1] 李培根. 工程教育需要大工程观[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2011(3): 1-3, 59. LI P G. Engineering education needs the view of engineering with A big E[J]. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2011(3): 1-3, 59 (in Chinese).

[2] 李伯聪. 工程思维的性质和认识史及其对工程教育改革的启示: 工程教育哲学笔记之三[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2018(4): 45-54. LI B C. Nature and cognition history of engineering thinking and its enlightenment to engineering education reform—notes on emerging engineering education(Ⅲ)[J]. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2018(4): 45-54 (in Chinese).

[3] 于海燕, 彭正洪, 何援军, 等. 工程图学内涵的变化与发展[J]. 图学学报, 2018, 39(5): 990-995. YU H Y, PENG Z H, HE Y J, et al. Changing and developing of connotation on engineering graphics[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2018, 39(5): 990-995 (in Chinese).

[4] 童秉枢, 田凌, 冯涓. 10 年来我国工程图学教学改革中的问题、认识与成果[J]. 工程图学学报, 2008, 29(4): 1-5. TONG B S, TIAN L, FENG J. Problems and achievements of engineering graphics teaching reform in recent 10 years[J]. Journal of Engineering Graphics, 2008, 29(4): 1-5 (in Chinese).

[5] 童秉枢. 图学思维的研究与训练[J]. 工程图学学报, 2010, 31(1): 1-5. TONG B S. Research and training on graphics thinking[J]. Journal of Engineering Graphics, 2010, 31(1): 1-5 (in Chinese).

[6] 陆国栋, 孙毅, 费少梅, 等. 面向思维力、表达力、工程力培养的图学教学改革[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2015(5): 1-7, 58. LU G D, SUN Y, FEI S M, et al. Graph-teaching reform on the cultivation of thinking ability, expressiveness and engineering competency[J]. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2015(5): 1-7, 58 (in Chinese).

[7] 张宗波, 王珉, 吴宝贵, 等. “线上+线下融合式”工程图学课程建设与教学实践[J]. 图学学报, 2016, 37(5): 718-725. ZHANG Z B, WANG M, WU B G, et al. Engineering graphics course construction and teaching practice based on "online and offline hybridized education mode"[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2016, 37(5): 718-725 (in Chinese).

[8] 刘衍聪, 马晓丽, 伊鹏. 现代图学教学中的图感因素探析[J]. 图学学报, 2013, 34(6): 110-113. LIU Y C, MA X L, YI P. Analysis of sense of drawing factors in modern graphics teaching[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2013, 34(6): 110-113 (in Chinese).

[9] 中国图学学会. 2018-2019 图学学科发展报告[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2020: 3-38. China Graphics Society. 2018-2019 Report on advances in graphics[M]. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press, 2020: 3-38 (in Chinese).

[10] 中国图学学会. 2012-2013 图学学科发展报告[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2014: 3-40. China Graphics Society. 2012-2013 Report on advances in graphics[M]. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press, 2014: 3-40 (in Chinese).

[11] 杜善义. 工程科学与科技强国[J]. 科技导报, 2020, 38(10): 41-43. DU S Y. Engineering Science and powerful country of science and technology[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2020, 38(10): 41-43 (in Chinese).

[12] GARDNER H. Multiple intelligence: new horizons[M]. New York: Basic Books, 2006: 3-20.

[13] WING J M. Computational thinking[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2006, 49(3): 33-35.

[14] WING J M. Computational thinking: what and why? [EB/OL]. (2010-09-17) [2021-06-01]. http://www.exploringcs.Org/ /wpcontent/uploads/2010/09/Wing-CT-Article.pdf.

[15] MIGLIARI R. Descriptive geometry: from its past to its future[J]. Nexus Network Journal, 2012, 14(3): 555-571.

[16] PRADO-VELASCO M, MARÍN R O, GARCÍA L, et al. Graphical modelling with computer extended descriptive geometry (CeDG): description and comparison with CAD[EB/OL]. [2021-06-12]. http://cad-journal.net/files/vol_18/ CAD_18(2)_2021_272-284.pdf.

[17] 于海燕, 蔡鸿明, 何援军. 图学计算基础[J]. 图学学报, 2013, 34(6): 1-5. YU H Y, CAI H M, HE Y J. The computational basis of graphics[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2013, 34(6): 1-5 (in Chinese).

[18] 何援军. 几何计算[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2013: 21-163. HE Y J. Geometric Computing[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2013: 121-163 (in Chinese).

[19] 何援军. 图学计算基础[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2018: 110-133. HE Y J. Fundamentals of Graphics Computing[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2018: 110-133 (in Chinese).

[20] YU H Y, HE Y J, ZHANG W J. A new approach to analyzing interactions of two objects in space based on a specially-tailored local coordinate system[EB/OL]. [2021-06-12]. https:// ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9409150.