Journal of Graphics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1106-1116.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2024051106
• Industrial Design • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Fanghua(), ZHANG Hangyuan, DING Man(
), LI Wenhua, PEI Huining
Received:
2024-05-15
Revised:
2024-08-29
Online:
2024-10-31
Published:
2024-10-31
Contact:
DING Man
About author:
First author contact:ZHAO Fanghua (1980-), associate professor, master. Her main research interests cover service design, intelligent cockpit and interaction design. E-mail:zhaofanghua@126.com
Supported by:
CLC Number:
ZHAO Fanghua, ZHANG Hangyuan, DING Man, LI Wenhua, PEI Huining. Research on evaluation method of coupling degree of interior and exterior styling images of smart vehicle[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2024, 45(5): 1106-1116.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.txxb.com.cn/EN/10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2024051106
样本 车型 | 观察距离/m | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | |
蔚来et7 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
理想i8 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
比亚迪汉 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Table 1 Sample set of interior and exterior images
样本 车型 | 观察距离/m | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | |
蔚来et7 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
理想i8 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
比亚迪汉 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
距离/m | 设计要素 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
轮毂 | 侧裙板 | 后视镜 | 侧边装饰件 | 腰线轮廓线 | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 车门饰板 | 座椅 | 中控台 | |
0.5 | - | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
1.0 | - | - | √ | - | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
1.5 | √ | - | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
2.0 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
2.5 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | - | √ | √ | - |
3.0 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - |
Table 2 Elements can be observed at each distance
距离/m | 设计要素 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
轮毂 | 侧裙板 | 后视镜 | 侧边装饰件 | 腰线轮廓线 | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 车门饰板 | 座椅 | 中控台 | |
0.5 | - | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
1.0 | - | - | √ | - | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
1.5 | √ | - | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
2.0 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
2.5 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | - | √ | √ | - |
3.0 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - |
样本车型 | 轮毂 | 侧裙板 | 后视镜 | 侧边装饰件 | 腰线轮廓线 | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 车门饰板 | 座椅 | 中控台 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
蔚来et7 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
理想 i8 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
比亚迪汉 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Table 3 Sample library of interior and exterior elements
样本车型 | 轮毂 | 侧裙板 | 后视镜 | 侧边装饰件 | 腰线轮廓线 | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 车门饰板 | 座椅 | 中控台 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
蔚来et7 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
理想 i8 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
比亚迪汉 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
意象 词汇 | 内饰 | 外饰 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
方向盘 | 仪表盘 | … | 轮毂 | 后视镜 | ||
现代 | 1.32 | 0.12 | … | 0.68 | 1.48 | … |
简约 | 1.20 | 0.46 | … | -0.80 | 0.00 | … |
个性 | 1.94 | -0.92 | … | 1.14 | 0.52 | … |
时尚 | 0.28 | -0.86 | … | 0.86 | -0.68 | … |
商务 | -0.06 | 0.46 | … | -1.20 | 1.08 | … |
Table 4 Image score of sample 1 design element
意象 词汇 | 内饰 | 外饰 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
方向盘 | 仪表盘 | … | 轮毂 | 后视镜 | ||
现代 | 1.32 | 0.12 | … | 0.68 | 1.48 | … |
简约 | 1.20 | 0.46 | … | -0.80 | 0.00 | … |
个性 | 1.94 | -0.92 | … | 1.14 | 0.52 | … |
时尚 | 0.28 | -0.86 | … | 0.86 | -0.68 | … |
商务 | -0.06 | 0.46 | … | -1.20 | 1.08 | … |
意象 词汇 | 内饰 | 外饰 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
方向盘 | 仪表盘 | … | 轮毂 | 后视镜 | ||
现代 | 0.86 | -0.06 | … | 2.06 | 0.22 | … |
简约 | -2.00 | 1.02 | … | -0.34 | 0.18 | … |
个性 | 0.46 | -1.94 | … | 0.98 | -0.52 | … |
时尚 | 0.12 | -1.14 | … | 1.02 | -1.88 | … |
商务 | 0.58 | 0.68 | … | 0.06 | -0.86 | … |
Table 5 Image score of sample 2 design element
意象 词汇 | 内饰 | 外饰 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
方向盘 | 仪表盘 | … | 轮毂 | 后视镜 | ||
现代 | 0.86 | -0.06 | … | 2.06 | 0.22 | … |
简约 | -2.00 | 1.02 | … | -0.34 | 0.18 | … |
个性 | 0.46 | -1.94 | … | 0.98 | -0.52 | … |
时尚 | 0.12 | -1.14 | … | 1.02 | -1.88 | … |
商务 | 0.58 | 0.68 | … | 0.06 | -0.86 | … |
意象 词汇 | 内饰 | 外饰 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
方向盘 | 仪表盘 | … | 轮毂 | 后视镜 | ||
现代 | 1.42 | 0.92 | … | 1.82 | 1.48 | … |
简约 | -1.94 | 1.02 | … | -1.20 | 0.28 | … |
个性 | 0.18 | -0.68 | … | 2.00 | 0.58 | … |
时尚 | 0.12 | -1.02 | … | 1.02 | 0.34 | … |
商务 | 0.58 | -0.74 | … | -0.52 | 0.28 | … |
Table 6 Image score of sample 3 design element
意象 词汇 | 内饰 | 外饰 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
方向盘 | 仪表盘 | … | 轮毂 | 后视镜 | ||
现代 | 1.42 | 0.92 | … | 1.82 | 1.48 | … |
简约 | -1.94 | 1.02 | … | -1.20 | 0.28 | … |
个性 | 0.18 | -0.68 | … | 2.00 | 0.58 | … |
时尚 | 0.12 | -1.02 | … | 1.02 | 0.34 | … |
商务 | 0.58 | -0.74 | … | -0.52 | 0.28 | … |
眼动实验指标 | F | P |
---|---|---|
AOI总访问持续时间 | 6.995 | 0.003 |
AOI注视总持续时间 | 4.866 | 0.028 |
首次注视持续时间 | 3.439 | 0.788 |
Table 7 One way ANOVA on eye movement index data
眼动实验指标 | F | P |
---|---|---|
AOI总访问持续时间 | 6.995 | 0.003 |
AOI注视总持续时间 | 4.866 | 0.028 |
首次注视持续时间 | 3.439 | 0.788 |
距离/m | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 控台 | 座椅 | … | 后视镜 | 车侧装饰件 | 侧裙板 | 腰线轮廓线 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | … | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | |
0.5 | 0.88 | 34.57 | 0.09 | 3.62 | 0.29 | 11.38 | 0.74 | 28.95 | … | ||||||||
1.0 | 0.46 | 21.60 | 0.07 | 3.20 | 0.22 | 10.49 | 0.45 | 21.18 | … | 0.05 | 2.45 | 0.05 | 2.45 | ||||
1.5 | 0.57 | 26.49 | 0.06 | 2.66 | 0.18 | 8.42 | 0.12 | 5.58 | … | 0.15 | 7.04 | 0.15 | 7.07 | ||||
2.0 | 0.22 | 15.39 | 0.07 | 4.69 | 0.08 | 5.52 | … | 0.09 | 6.11 | 0.02 | 1.50 | 0.03 | 1.71 | 0.19 | 21.95 | ||
2.5 | 0.11 | 11.25 | 0.04 | 3.89 | 0.03 | 3.37 | … | 0.04 | 3.65 | 0.05 | 4.01 | 0.02 | 2.01 | 0.18 | 12.26 | ||
3.0 | … | 0.06 | 12.01 | 0.01 | 2.36 | 0.01 | 2.36 | 0.5 | 24.09 |
Table 8 Objective cognitive weights of each element of sample 1
距离/m | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 控台 | 座椅 | … | 后视镜 | 车侧装饰件 | 侧裙板 | 腰线轮廓线 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | … | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | |
0.5 | 0.88 | 34.57 | 0.09 | 3.62 | 0.29 | 11.38 | 0.74 | 28.95 | … | ||||||||
1.0 | 0.46 | 21.60 | 0.07 | 3.20 | 0.22 | 10.49 | 0.45 | 21.18 | … | 0.05 | 2.45 | 0.05 | 2.45 | ||||
1.5 | 0.57 | 26.49 | 0.06 | 2.66 | 0.18 | 8.42 | 0.12 | 5.58 | … | 0.15 | 7.04 | 0.15 | 7.07 | ||||
2.0 | 0.22 | 15.39 | 0.07 | 4.69 | 0.08 | 5.52 | … | 0.09 | 6.11 | 0.02 | 1.50 | 0.03 | 1.71 | 0.19 | 21.95 | ||
2.5 | 0.11 | 11.25 | 0.04 | 3.89 | 0.03 | 3.37 | … | 0.04 | 3.65 | 0.05 | 4.01 | 0.02 | 2.01 | 0.18 | 12.26 | ||
3.0 | … | 0.06 | 12.01 | 0.01 | 2.36 | 0.01 | 2.36 | 0.5 | 24.09 |
距离/m | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 中控台 | 座椅 | … | 后视镜 | 车侧装饰件 | 侧裙板 | 腰线轮廓线 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | … | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | |
0.5 | 0.63 | 23.24 | 0.15 | 5.41 | 0.25 | 9.14 | 0.73 | 26.91 | … | ||||||||
1.0 | 0.26 | 12.78 | 0.06 | 2.97 | 0.06 | 3.35 | 0.28 | 14.96 | … | 0.11 | 5.66 | 0.04 | 2.22 | ||||
1.5 | 0.26 | 18.27 | 0.03 | 18.27 | 0.13 | 9.13 | … | 0.10 | 7.41 | 0.04 | 3.03 | 0.18 | 12.47 | ||||
2.0 | 0.06 | 4.36 | 0.01 | 0.73 | 0.09 | 6.55 | … | 0.07 | 5.20 | 0.15 | 10.93 | 0.01 | 0.93 | 0.19 | 14.05 | ||
2.5 | 0.06 | 5.47 | 0.05 | 4.14 | 0.08 | 6.89 | … | 0.07 | 5.71 | 0.05 | 5.47 | 0.01 | 0.93 | 0.17 | 11.37 | ||
3.0 | … | 0.08 | 8.19 | 0.04 | 4.08 | 0.03 | 3.02 | 0.39 | 37.90 |
Table 9 Objective cognitive weights of each element of sample 2
距离/m | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 中控台 | 座椅 | … | 后视镜 | 车侧装饰件 | 侧裙板 | 腰线轮廓线 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | … | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | |
0.5 | 0.63 | 23.24 | 0.15 | 5.41 | 0.25 | 9.14 | 0.73 | 26.91 | … | ||||||||
1.0 | 0.26 | 12.78 | 0.06 | 2.97 | 0.06 | 3.35 | 0.28 | 14.96 | … | 0.11 | 5.66 | 0.04 | 2.22 | ||||
1.5 | 0.26 | 18.27 | 0.03 | 18.27 | 0.13 | 9.13 | … | 0.10 | 7.41 | 0.04 | 3.03 | 0.18 | 12.47 | ||||
2.0 | 0.06 | 4.36 | 0.01 | 0.73 | 0.09 | 6.55 | … | 0.07 | 5.20 | 0.15 | 10.93 | 0.01 | 0.93 | 0.19 | 14.05 | ||
2.5 | 0.06 | 5.47 | 0.05 | 4.14 | 0.08 | 6.89 | … | 0.07 | 5.71 | 0.05 | 5.47 | 0.01 | 0.93 | 0.17 | 11.37 | ||
3.0 | … | 0.08 | 8.19 | 0.04 | 4.08 | 0.03 | 3.02 | 0.39 | 37.90 |
距离/m | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 中控台 | 座椅 | … | 后视镜 | 车侧装饰件 | 侧裙板 | 腰线轮廓线 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | … | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | |
0.5 | 0.82 | 31.47 | 0.24 | 9.02 | 0.31 | 11.93 | 0.87 | 33.47 | … | ||||||||
1.0 | 0.66 | 25.24 | 0.14 | 5.43 | 0.14 | 5.50 | 0.69 | 26.41 | … | 0.11 | 4.05 | 0.08 | 2.94 | ||||
1.5 | 0.35 | 16.61 | 0.11 | 5.25 | 0.01 | 0.37 | 0.30 | 14.20 | … | 0.14 | 6.59 | 0.01 | 0.52 | 0.15 | 6.97 | ||
2.0 | 0.11 | 7.09 | 0.02 | 1.13 | 0.30 | 19.18 | … | 0.10 | 1.16 | 0.02 | 1.12 | 0.02 | 1.16 | 0.42 | 25.65 | ||
2.5 | 0.06 | 4.00 | 0.02 | 1.13 | 0.13 | 9.08 | … | 0.03 | 2.24 | 0.01 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 1.40 | 0.13 | 8.70 | ||
3.0 | … | 0.05 | 10.48 | 0.01 | 2.18 | 0.01 | 2.25 | 0.21 | 39.69 |
Table 10 Objective cognitive weights of each element of sample 3
距离/m | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 中控台 | 座椅 | … | 后视镜 | 车侧装饰件 | 侧裙板 | 腰线轮廓线 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | … | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | 时长/s | 权重 | |
0.5 | 0.82 | 31.47 | 0.24 | 9.02 | 0.31 | 11.93 | 0.87 | 33.47 | … | ||||||||
1.0 | 0.66 | 25.24 | 0.14 | 5.43 | 0.14 | 5.50 | 0.69 | 26.41 | … | 0.11 | 4.05 | 0.08 | 2.94 | ||||
1.5 | 0.35 | 16.61 | 0.11 | 5.25 | 0.01 | 0.37 | 0.30 | 14.20 | … | 0.14 | 6.59 | 0.01 | 0.52 | 0.15 | 6.97 | ||
2.0 | 0.11 | 7.09 | 0.02 | 1.13 | 0.30 | 19.18 | … | 0.10 | 1.16 | 0.02 | 1.12 | 0.02 | 1.16 | 0.42 | 25.65 | ||
2.5 | 0.06 | 4.00 | 0.02 | 1.13 | 0.13 | 9.08 | … | 0.03 | 2.24 | 0.01 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 1.40 | 0.13 | 8.70 | ||
3.0 | … | 0.05 | 10.48 | 0.01 | 2.18 | 0.01 | 2.25 | 0.21 | 39.69 |
参数 | 外饰 | 内饰 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
轮毂 | 后视镜 | … | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 中控台 | … | |
主观权重/% | 19.87 | 14.13 | … | 15.73 | 17.73 | 30.13 | … |
Table 11 Expert subjective factor weight
参数 | 外饰 | 内饰 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
轮毂 | 后视镜 | … | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 中控台 | … | |
主观权重/% | 19.87 | 14.13 | … | 15.73 | 17.73 | 30.13 | … |
距离/m | 综合认知权重 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
轮毂 | 侧裙板 | 后视镜 | 侧边装饰件 | 腰线轮廓线 | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 车门饰板 | 座椅 | 中控台 | |
0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.25 | 8.68 | 22.87 | 23.16 | 20.05 |
1.0 | 0 | 0 | 2.55 | 0 | 26.19 | 14.56 | 5.95 | 22.25 | 14.45 | 14.05 |
1.5 | 0 | 0 | 6.39 | 0.68 | 10.67 | 20.42 | 6.88 | 29.65 | 9.39 | 15.94 |
2.0 | 9.02 | 3.79 | 6.62 | 2.91 | 15.73 | 15.00 | 8.79 | 29.13 | 9.00 | 0 |
2.5 | 15.11 | 4.90 | 6.10 | 0.90 | 22.66 | 11.51 | 7.18 | 25.33 | 6.31 | 0 |
3.0 | 25.89 | 6.87 | 14.33 | 1.16 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 12 Sample 1 comprehensive weight of interior and exterior elements/%
距离/m | 综合认知权重 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
轮毂 | 侧裙板 | 后视镜 | 侧边装饰件 | 腰线轮廓线 | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 车门饰板 | 座椅 | 中控台 | |
0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.25 | 8.68 | 22.87 | 23.16 | 20.05 |
1.0 | 0 | 0 | 2.55 | 0 | 26.19 | 14.56 | 5.95 | 22.25 | 14.45 | 14.05 |
1.5 | 0 | 0 | 6.39 | 0.68 | 10.67 | 20.42 | 6.88 | 29.65 | 9.39 | 15.94 |
2.0 | 9.02 | 3.79 | 6.62 | 2.91 | 15.73 | 15.00 | 8.79 | 29.13 | 9.00 | 0 |
2.5 | 15.11 | 4.90 | 6.10 | 0.90 | 22.66 | 11.51 | 7.18 | 25.33 | 6.31 | 0 |
3.0 | 25.89 | 6.87 | 14.33 | 1.16 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
距离/m | 综合认知权重 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
轮毂 | 侧裙板 | 后视镜 | 侧边装饰件 | 腰线轮廓线 | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 车门饰板 | 座椅 | 中控台 | |
0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.55 | 10.53 | 28.91 | 22.17 | 17.84 |
1.0 | 0 | 0 | 4.69 | 0 | 4.84 | 16.28 | 8.02 | 38.06 | 17.01 | 11.11 |
1.5 | 1.01 | 0 | 7.35 | 4.17 | 15.71 | 18.25 | 6.86 | 33.71 | 12.93 | 0 |
2.0 | 15.46 | 4.07 | 8.01 | 10.31 | 20.60 | 6.57 | 2.86 | 24.04 | 8.07 | 0 |
2.5 | 26.75 | 4.15 | 9.51 | 1.80 | 25.16 | 5.68 | 5.25 | 15.31 | 6.39 | 0 |
3.0 | 35.66 | 1.45 | 12.17 | 7.62 | 43.10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 13 Sample 2 comprehensive weight of interior and exterior elements/%
距离/m | 综合认知权重 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
轮毂 | 侧裙板 | 后视镜 | 侧边装饰件 | 腰线轮廓线 | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 车门饰板 | 座椅 | 中控台 | |
0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.55 | 10.53 | 28.91 | 22.17 | 17.84 |
1.0 | 0 | 0 | 4.69 | 0 | 4.84 | 16.28 | 8.02 | 38.06 | 17.01 | 11.11 |
1.5 | 1.01 | 0 | 7.35 | 4.17 | 15.71 | 18.25 | 6.86 | 33.71 | 12.93 | 0 |
2.0 | 15.46 | 4.07 | 8.01 | 10.31 | 20.60 | 6.57 | 2.86 | 24.04 | 8.07 | 0 |
2.5 | 26.75 | 4.15 | 9.51 | 1.80 | 25.16 | 5.68 | 5.25 | 15.31 | 6.39 | 0 |
3.0 | 35.66 | 1.45 | 12.17 | 7.62 | 43.10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
距离/m | 综合认知权重 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
轮毂 | 侧裙板 | 后视镜 | 侧边装饰件 | 腰线轮廓线 | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 车门饰板 | 座椅 | 中控台 | |
0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.70 | 13.48 | 18.12 | 24.50 | 20.20 |
1.0 | 0 | 0 | 3.18 | 0.44 | 4.69 | 20.73 | 10.20 | 26.11 | 21.25 | 13.39 |
1.5 | 0.91 | 0 | 6.25 | 1.55 | 10.66 | 17.13 | 10.23 | 33.88 | 15.88 | 3.52 |
2.0 | 11.51 | 3.61 | 7.84 | 2.90 | 26.25 | 8.92 | 4.23 | 20.03 | 14.71 | 0 |
2.5 | 31.04 | 4.92 | 5.76 | 2.37 | 18.70 | 6.15 | 3.47 | 18.30 | 9.28 | 0 |
3.0 | 28.85 | 2.01 | 19.02 | 1.65 | 48.47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 14 Sample 3 comprehensive weight of interior and exterior elements/%
距离/m | 综合认知权重 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
轮毂 | 侧裙板 | 后视镜 | 侧边装饰件 | 腰线轮廓线 | 方向盘 | 仪表盘 | 车门饰板 | 座椅 | 中控台 | |
0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.70 | 13.48 | 18.12 | 24.50 | 20.20 |
1.0 | 0 | 0 | 3.18 | 0.44 | 4.69 | 20.73 | 10.20 | 26.11 | 21.25 | 13.39 |
1.5 | 0.91 | 0 | 6.25 | 1.55 | 10.66 | 17.13 | 10.23 | 33.88 | 15.88 | 3.52 |
2.0 | 11.51 | 3.61 | 7.84 | 2.90 | 26.25 | 8.92 | 4.23 | 20.03 | 14.71 | 0 |
2.5 | 31.04 | 4.92 | 5.76 | 2.37 | 18.70 | 6.15 | 3.47 | 18.30 | 9.28 | 0 |
3.0 | 28.85 | 2.01 | 19.02 | 1.65 | 48.47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
参数 | 距离/m | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | |||||||
外观 | 内饰 | 外观 | 内饰 | 外观 | 内饰 | 外观 | 内饰 | 外观 | 内饰 | 外观 | 内饰 | |
注视时长/s | 0 | 2.91 | 0.96 | 2.96 | 1.31 | 2.18 | 2.08 | 1.47 | 2.82 | 0.76 | 3.79 | 0 |
权重/% | 0 | 100 | 24.37 | 75.47 | 37.62 | 62.44 | 58.49 | 41.41 | 63.25 | 17.15 | 100 | 0 |
Table 15 Duration and cognitive weight of interior and exterior for sample 1
参数 | 距离/m | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | |||||||
外观 | 内饰 | 外观 | 内饰 | 外观 | 内饰 | 外观 | 内饰 | 外观 | 内饰 | 外观 | 内饰 | |
注视时长/s | 0 | 2.91 | 0.96 | 2.96 | 1.31 | 2.18 | 2.08 | 1.47 | 2.82 | 0.76 | 3.79 | 0 |
权重/% | 0 | 100 | 24.37 | 75.47 | 37.62 | 62.44 | 58.49 | 41.41 | 63.25 | 17.15 | 100 | 0 |
[1] | 李明, 刘肖健. 用户感性意象数据的可视化分析技术[J]. 机械设计, 2021, 38(4): 123-128. |
LI M, LIU X J. Visualization analysis technology of user perceptual image data[J]. Journal of Machine Design, 2021, 38(4): 123-128 (in Chinese). | |
[2] | 谭浩, 唐诗妍. 智能汽车交互界面用户体验评估方法体系综述[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(6): 12-24. |
TAN H, TANG S Y. User experience evaluation methodology of interactive interface in intelligent vehicle[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44(6): 12-24 (in Chinese). | |
[3] |
丁满, 程语, 黄晓光, 等. 感性工学设计方法研究现状与进展[J]. 机械设计, 2020, 37(1): 121-127.
DOI |
DING M, CHENG Y, HUANG X G, et al. Status and progress of Kansei engineering design method[J]. Journal of Machine Design, 2020, 37(1): 121-127 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
[4] | 裴卉宁, 谭昭芸, 张金勇, 等. DCGAN在汽车造型设计模型中的应用[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2022, 41(10): 1567-1576. |
PEI H N, TAN Z Y, ZHANG J Y, et al. Application of DCGAN to design model of automobile modeling[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2022, 41(10): 1567-1576 (in Chinese). | |
[5] | 程永胜, 徐骁琪. 基于产品族DNA的汽车品牌前脸造型基因研究[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2022(11): 37-43. |
CHENG Y S, XU X Q. Study on the front face modeling gene of automobile brand based on product family DNA[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2022(11): 37-43 (in Chinese). | |
[6] | 陈国强, 申正义, 孙利, 等. 基于BP神经网络优化遗传算法的智能座舱感性意象预测[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(8): 1479-1488. |
CHEN G Q, SHEN Z Y, SUN L, et al. Intelligent cockpit perceptual image prediction based on BP neural network optimization genetic algorithm[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(8): 1479-1488 (in Chinese). | |
[7] | SAPIENZA A, CANTUCCI F, FALCONE R. Modeling interaction in human-machine systems: a trust and trustworthiness approach[J]. Automation, 2022, 3(2): 242-257. |
[8] | 黄颖捷, 赵丹华. 汽车内饰与外饰造型形态一致性认知研究[J]. 设计艺术研究, 2022, 12(1): 56-60. |
HUANG Y J, ZHAO D H. Study on cognitive matching of shape consistency between automobile interior and exterior[J]. Design Research, 2022, 12(1): 56-60 (in Chinese). | |
[9] | 王增, 徐镇, 黄凌玉. 汽车内外饰设计用涂装材料及其工艺研究进展[J]. 表面技术, 2019, 48(6): 338-345. |
WANG Z, XU Z, HUANG L Y. Research progress in coating materials and processes of automobile interior and exterior design[J]. Surface Technology, 2019, 48(6): 338-345 (in Chinese). | |
[10] | AI J Y, FENG L, DONG X W, et al. Exploring coupling coordination between urbanization and ecosystem quality (1985-2010): a case study from Lianyungang City, China[J]. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2016, 10(3): 527-545. |
[11] | TIAN Q H, ZHANG C, ZHU W, et al. Study on fuzzy duration of serial coupled iterative design tasks in product development[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 892(1): 012080. |
[12] | 陈羽, 滕弘飞. 产品设计耦合分析研究进展[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2011, 17(8): 1729-1736. |
CHEN Y, TENG H F. Advances of coupling analysis for product design[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2011, 17(8): 1729-1736 (in Chinese). | |
[13] |
苏建宁, 胡晴, 张书涛, 等. 面向汽车车身色彩-材料-表面处理工艺的耦合设计特性研究[J]. 机械设计, 2020, 37(4): 119-125.
DOI |
SU J N, HU Q, ZHANG S T, et al. Research on coupling design characteristics for color-material-finishing of car body[J]. Journal of Machine Design, 2020, 37(4): 119-125 (in Chinese). | |
[14] | BAI Z H, SONG M J, ZHANG X, et al. Biological prototype acquisition based on biological coupling in bionic design[J]. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2022, 2022: 8458243. |
[15] | ERIKSEN C W, JAMES J D S. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model[J]. Perception & Psychophysics, 1986, 40(4): 225-240. |
[16] |
白翔天, 戴端. 基于感性意象的高速列车座椅设计及美学规律研究[J]. 图学学报, 2020, 41(5): 805-813.
DOI |
BAI X T, DAI D. Modeling design and aesthetic rules studies of high-speed train seats based on perceptual image[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2020, 41(5): 805-813 (in Chinese). | |
[17] | 王金军, 方灏. 基于眼动的内饰造型特征认知与品牌识别研究[J]. 包装工程, 2020, 41(22): 53-59. |
WANG J J, FANG H. Cognition of interior styling feature and brand recognition based on eye tracking[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2020, 41(22): 53-59 (in Chinese). | |
[18] |
张丙辰, 王艳群, 宋丽姝, 等. 基于多视角意象差异性的列车设施造型设计研究[J]. 图学学报, 2018, 39(4): 675-678.
DOI |
ZHANG B C, WANG Y Q, SONG L S. On modeling design of train facilities based on differences in multi-view visual images[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2018, 39(4): 675-678 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
[19] | 陆蔚华, 姜冠岳, 刘雨婷, 等. 公务机驾驶舱内饰布局设计感性评价[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2022, 30(1): 28-41. |
LU W H, JIANG G Y, LIU Y T, et al. Kansei evaluation of interior layout design of business jet cockpit[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2022, 30(1): 28-41 (in Chinese). | |
[20] | 鞠清绘, 刘炜祯, 阮景奎. 基于感性意象的概念汽车车身造型评价研究[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(4): 270-276. |
JU Q H, LIU W Z, RUAN J K. Evaluation study on conceptual vehicle styling design based on perceptual image[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44(4): 270-276 (in Chinese). |
[1] | YANG Yan-pu, LAN Chen-xin, LEI Zi-jing, WANG Xin-rui, GONG Zheng . Research on multi-stage network coupling decision-making method of product styling design [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2021, 42(6): 1018-1026. |
[2] | ZHU Kui-xin1, GAI Meng2,3, LAI Shun-nan2 . Real-Time Simulation of Water with Volume Conservation in Large Time Step [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2019, 40(4): 725-732. |
[3] | SHAO Xu-qiang, ZHENG Kai-xuan, XU Wei-feng, ZHAO Wen-qing . Unified Material Point Method for Realistic Simulation of Fluid-Solid Interaction [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2019, 40(3): 497-502. |
[4] | SHAO Xuqiang, JING Xiaozhu, LIU Shugang. Realistic Simulation of Physical Animation Based on Lagrangian Particle Method [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2017, 38(3): 297-302. |
[5] | Huang Xueliang, Li Na, Chen Liping. Classification and Solution of 3D Assembly Geometric Constraint System Between Two Rigid Bodies [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2014, 35(2): 236-242. |
[6] | Zhang Bo, Wang Zhuo, Zhang Baizheng, Wu Lei. Research on design method of winch driven by contactless magnetic coupling under deepwater [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2012, 33(1): 8-14. |
[7] | MA Jian-zhe, WANG Hong-zhi, LI Ji-bin. A Study of the 3D CAD Technology of Aluminum Profiles Porthole Extrusion Dies for Engineering Application [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2011, 32(4): 1-7. |
[8] | TONG Ji-bin, JIN Ping. Structure Modeling and Finite Element Analysis of SWL 550 Cross Shaft Universal Coupling [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2011, 32(2): 37-43. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||