Journal of Graphics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1156-1165.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026051156
Previous Articles Next Articles
KONG Qiyan, YANG Yajin, YANG Shiyou(
)
Received:2026-01-12
Accepted:2026-06-26
Online:2026-10-31
Published:2026-10-26
CLC Number:
KONG Qiyan, YANG Yajin, YANG Shiyou. A Top-down design method for inter-conductor clearance verification of overhead transmission lines[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(5): 1156-1165.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.txxb.com.cn/EN/10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026051156
| 参数 | 说明 |
|---|---|
| 节点信息 | P,点编号,x,y,z(坐标相对于模型原点) |
| 单线信息 | R,节点编号1,节点编号2 |
| 挂点信息 | G,挂点类型,挂点名称, x,y,z(坐标相对于模型原点) |
Table 1 Level of geometric detail for universal tower model
| 参数 | 说明 |
|---|---|
| 节点信息 | P,点编号,x,y,z(坐标相对于模型原点) |
| 单线信息 | R,节点编号1,节点编号2 |
| 挂点信息 | G,挂点类型,挂点名称, x,y,z(坐标相对于模型原点) |
| 杆塔类型 | 四回路杆 | 上字型耐张塔 |
|---|---|---|
| 节点数量 | 16 | 28 |
| 单线数量 | 8 | 40 |
| 挂点数量 | 14 | 7 |
| *.mod文件大小/字节 | 601 | 1 193 |
Table 2 Data volume of skeleton models for typical towers
| 杆塔类型 | 四回路杆 | 上字型耐张塔 |
|---|---|---|
| 节点数量 | 16 | 28 |
| 单线数量 | 8 | 40 |
| 挂点数量 | 14 | 7 |
| *.mod文件大小/字节 | 601 | 1 193 |
Fig. 5 Schematic diagram of positioning information transmission for transmission line skeleton model—a case study of quadruple-to-double-circuit line
| 线路信息 | 双回路杆塔-塔1 | 双回路杆塔-塔2 |
|---|---|---|
| 杆塔定位参数 (x,y,z,θ)/(m,m,m,°) | (0,0,0,0) | (0,100,0,30) |
| 杆塔通用模型 (形状骨架)部分 挂点信息 | G,C,导1, −4.5,0,28 G,C,导2, −3,0,24.5 G,C,导3, −4.5,0,21 G,C,导4,4.5,0,28 G,C,导5,3,0,24.5 G,C,导6,4.5,0,21 | |
| 装配关系 (“导线编号, 装配信息”) | 1,{塔1,导1;塔2,导1} 2,{塔1,导2;塔2,导2} 3,{塔1,导3;塔2,导3} 4,{塔1,导4;塔2,导4} 5,{塔1,导5;塔2,导5} 6,{塔1,导6;塔2,导6} | |
Table 3 Initial line information
| 线路信息 | 双回路杆塔-塔1 | 双回路杆塔-塔2 |
|---|---|---|
| 杆塔定位参数 (x,y,z,θ)/(m,m,m,°) | (0,0,0,0) | (0,100,0,30) |
| 杆塔通用模型 (形状骨架)部分 挂点信息 | G,C,导1, −4.5,0,28 G,C,导2, −3,0,24.5 G,C,导3, −4.5,0,21 G,C,导4,4.5,0,28 G,C,导5,3,0,24.5 G,C,导6,4.5,0,21 | |
| 装配关系 (“导线编号, 装配信息”) | 1,{塔1,导1;塔2,导1} 2,{塔1,导2;塔2,导2} 3,{塔1,导3;塔2,导3} 4,{塔1,导4;塔2,导4} 5,{塔1,导5;塔2,导5} 6,{塔1,导6;塔2,导6} | |
Fig. 9 Interface for four types of design modifications ((a) Tower position or geometric structure; (b) Phase sequence arrangement; (c) Custom operating condition)
| 导线编号 | 参数值 | 终止挂点 全局坐标/m | 形态参数 /10−3∙MPa/m, 10−3∙MPa/m, MPa |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 改前 | (−3.897, 97.750, 28.000) | (0, 31.130, 56.458) |
| 改后 | (−5.629, 96.750, 28.000) | (0, 31.130, 56.380) | |
| 4 | 改前 | (3.897, 102.250, 28.000) | (0, 31.130, 56.810) |
| 改后 | (5.629, 103.250, 28.000) | (0, 31.130, 56.890) |
Table 4 Comparison of key parameters after changing the tower top geometry
| 导线编号 | 参数值 | 终止挂点 全局坐标/m | 形态参数 /10−3∙MPa/m, 10−3∙MPa/m, MPa |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 改前 | (−3.897, 97.750, 28.000) | (0, 31.130, 56.458) |
| 改后 | (−5.629, 96.750, 28.000) | (0, 31.130, 56.380) | |
| 4 | 改前 | (3.897, 102.250, 28.000) | (0, 31.130, 56.810) |
| 改后 | (5.629, 103.250, 28.000) | (0, 31.130, 56.890) |
| 装配关系 | 参数值 | 终止挂点全局坐标/m | 形态参数 /10−3∙MPa/m, 10−3∙MPa/m, MPa |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,{塔1,导1;塔2,导2} | 改前 | (−3.90, 97.75, 28.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.46) |
| 改后 | (−2.60, 98.50, 24.50) | (0, 31.13, 56.53) | |
| 2,{塔1,导2;塔2,导3} | 改前 | (−2.60, 98.50, 24.50) | (0, 31.13, 56.52) |
| 改后 | (−3.90, 97.75, 21.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.47) | |
| 3,{塔1,导3;塔2,导1} | 改前 | (−3.90, 97.75, 21.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.46) |
| 改后 | (−3.90, 97.75, 28.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.51) | |
| 4,{塔1,导4;塔2,导5} | 改前 | (3.90, 102.25, 28.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.81) |
| 改后 | (2.60, 101.50, 24.50) | (0, 31.13, 56.76) | |
| 5,{塔1,导5;塔2,导6} | 改前 | (2.60, 101.50, 24.50) | (0, 31.13, 56.75) |
| 改后 | (3.90, 102.25, 21.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.82) | |
| 6,{塔1,导6;塔2,导4} | 改前 | (3.90, 102.25, 21.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.81) |
| 改后 | (3.90, 102.25, 28.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.85) |
Table 5 Comparison of key parameters after changing the conductor arrangement
| 装配关系 | 参数值 | 终止挂点全局坐标/m | 形态参数 /10−3∙MPa/m, 10−3∙MPa/m, MPa |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,{塔1,导1;塔2,导2} | 改前 | (−3.90, 97.75, 28.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.46) |
| 改后 | (−2.60, 98.50, 24.50) | (0, 31.13, 56.53) | |
| 2,{塔1,导2;塔2,导3} | 改前 | (−2.60, 98.50, 24.50) | (0, 31.13, 56.52) |
| 改后 | (−3.90, 97.75, 21.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.47) | |
| 3,{塔1,导3;塔2,导1} | 改前 | (−3.90, 97.75, 21.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.46) |
| 改后 | (−3.90, 97.75, 28.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.51) | |
| 4,{塔1,导4;塔2,导5} | 改前 | (3.90, 102.25, 28.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.81) |
| 改后 | (2.60, 101.50, 24.50) | (0, 31.13, 56.76) | |
| 5,{塔1,导5;塔2,导6} | 改前 | (2.60, 101.50, 24.50) | (0, 31.13, 56.75) |
| 改后 | (3.90, 102.25, 21.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.82) | |
| 6,{塔1,导6;塔2,导4} | 改前 | (3.90, 102.25, 21.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.81) |
| 改后 | (3.90, 102.25, 28.00) | (0, 31.13, 56.85) |
| 编号 | 年平工况形态参数 /10−3∙MPa/m, 10−3∙MPa/m, MPa | 自定义工况形态参数 /10−3∙MPa/m, 10−3∙MPa/m, MPa |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | (0, 31.13, 56.46) | (0, 52.00, 84.94) |
| 2 | (0, 31.13, 56.52) | (0, 52.00, 85.02) |
| 3 | (0, 31.13, 56.46) | (0, 52.00, 84.94) |
| 4 | (0, 31.13, 56.81) | (0, 52.00, 85.44) |
| 5 | (0, 31.13, 56.75) | (0, 52.00, 85.36) |
| 6 | (0, 31.13, 56.81) | (0, 52.00, 85.44) |
Table 6 Comparison of conductor configuration parameters under custom and annual average temperature conditions
| 编号 | 年平工况形态参数 /10−3∙MPa/m, 10−3∙MPa/m, MPa | 自定义工况形态参数 /10−3∙MPa/m, 10−3∙MPa/m, MPa |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | (0, 31.13, 56.46) | (0, 52.00, 84.94) |
| 2 | (0, 31.13, 56.52) | (0, 52.00, 85.02) |
| 3 | (0, 31.13, 56.46) | (0, 52.00, 84.94) |
| 4 | (0, 31.13, 56.81) | (0, 52.00, 85.44) |
| 5 | (0, 31.13, 56.75) | (0, 52.00, 85.36) |
| 6 | (0, 31.13, 56.81) | (0, 52.00, 85.44) |
Fig. 11 3D visualization of clearance verification for complex line structures ((a) A quadruple-to-double-circuit conversion scenario; (b) A cross-over line scenario)
| [1] | 黎海兵, 张忠波, 陈友鹏, 等. 支持产品变型设计的建模方法研究[J]. 现代制造工程, 2022(10): 63-67, 26. |
| LI H B, ZHANG Z B, CHEN Y P, et al. Research on modeling approach for product variant design[J]. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, 2022(10): 63-67, 26 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] | 郄鑫, 齐立忠, 胡君慧. 三维数字化设计技术在输变电工程中的应用[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2012, 28(11): 23-26. |
| QIE X, QI L Z, HU J H. Application of 3D digital design technology in power transmission project[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2012, 28(11): 23-26 (in Chinese). | |
| [3] | 陶刚. 基于GIM的架空输电线路三维模型构建方法研究[J]. 电力勘测设计, 2021(7): 63-70. |
| TAO G. Study on three-dimensional model construction method of overhead transmission line based on GIM[J]. Electric Power Survey & Design, 2021(7): 63-70 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] | 官澜, 李奥森, 韩念遐, 等. 基于数字化三维模型的架空输电线路设计[J]. 电测与仪表, 2020, 57(3): 105-109. |
| GUAN L, LI A S, HAN N X, et al. Design of overhead transmission lines based on digital three-dimensional model[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2020, 57(3): 105-109 (in Chinese). | |
| [5] |
贺谦, 席平. 弹体结构自顶向下的参数化装配体建模方法[J]. 图学学报, 2016, 37(2): 193-198.
DOI |
|
HE Q, XI P. Top-down parametric assembly modeling method of missile body structure[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2016, 37(2): 193-198 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [6] | 王雨楠, 高伟, 董越, 等. 一种自顶向下的机舱通风管系三维设计方法[J]. 船舶工程, 2024, 46(12): 38-45. |
| WANG Y N, GAO W, DONG Y, et al. A 3D design method of engine room ventilation piping based on the top-down concept[J]. Ship Engineering, 2024, 46(12): 38-45 (in Chinese). | |
| [7] |
张洲, 席平, 胡毕富. 基于骨架模型的船体结构快速建模[J]. 图学学报, 2018, 39(5): 849-854.
DOI |
|
ZHANG Z, XI P, HU B F. A rapid structure modeling method based on skeleton model in ship design[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2018, 39(5): 849-854 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [8] | 汪晶毅, 潘春平, 朱映洁. 国内外架空输电线路档中线间距设计的对比研究[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(11): 90-95. |
| WANG J Y, PAN C P, ZHU Y J. Comparative research on mid span clearances of overhead transmission lines design between domestic and foreign standards[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(11): 90-95 (in Chinese). | |
| [9] | 郭日彩, 许子智, 齐立忠, 等. 美国输电线路典型设计概况及对我国电网工程设计建设的启示[J]. 电网技术, 2007, 31(12): 33-41. |
| GUO R C, XU Z Z, QI L Z, et al. General situation of typical transmission line design in USA and its enlightenment to design and construction of power grids in China[J]. Power System Technology, 2007, 31(12): 33-41 (in Chinese). | |
| [10] | 蒋剑, 惠帅, 李毓, 等. 三维GIS平台复杂工况下的电气校验[J]. 测绘科学, 2017, 42(1): 171-176. |
| JIANG J, HUI S, LI Y, et al. Study on the electrical calibration in complex conditions based on 3D GIS platform[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2017, 42(1): 171-176 (in Chinese). | |
| [11] |
XU S H, TANG X Y, LI C T, et al. A top-down lashing bridge collaborative design method[J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2025, 20(5): 660-671.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
LIU S C, NAN S K, TIAN L. An evaluation method for the skeleton model based on function-behavior-structure correlation analysis[J]. Machines, 2025, 13(1): 32.
DOI URL |
| [13] | 国家能源局. NB/T 11199-2023 输变电工程三维设计模型交互及建模规范[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2023. |
| National Energy Administration. NB/T 11199-2023 Interaction specification for the three-dimensional design model of power transmission and transformation project[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2023 (in Chinese). | |
| [14] | 李美峰, 骆俊林, 冯勇, 等. 输电线路铁塔挂点数字化模型研究[J]. 电力勘测设计, 2022(8): 9-14, 34. |
| LI M F, LUO J L, FENG Y, et al. Research on the three-dimensional digital model of tower hanging point in transmission line[J]. Electric Power Survey & Design, 2022(8): 9-14, 34 (in Chinese). | |
| [15] | 中国电力企业联合会. T/CEC 5056.2-2021 输变电工程三维设计建模规范第2部分: 架空线路[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2021. |
| China Electricity Council. T/CEC 5056.2-2021 Modeling specifications for the three-dimensional design of power transmission and transformation project: part 2: overhead transmission line[S]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2021 (in Chinese). | |
| [16] | 齐从谦, 贾伟新. 支持变型设计的装配模型建模方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2004, 40(1): 38-42. |
| QI C Q, JIA W X. Research on assembly modelling for product variant design[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2004, 40(1): 38-42 (in Chinese). |
| [1] | ZHU Hui-xian, XU Zhao . Research on information collaboration and model construction for top-down design of prefabricated buildings [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2021, 42(2): 289-298. |
| [2] | ZHANG Zhou, XI Ping, HU Bifu . A Rapid Structure Modeling Method Based on Skeleton Model in Ship Design [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2018, 39(5): 849-854. |
| [3] | TIAN Qiaoping, LV Jian, PAN Weijie, WANG Weiyi, YUAN Tao. Research on Product Deep Personalized Customization Based on User Requirements [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2018, 39(5): 867-878. |
| [4] | He Qian, Xi Ping. Top-Down Parametric Assembly Modeling Method of Missile Body Structure [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2016, 37(2): 193-198. |
| [5] | Zhu Xuemin, Wang Zongyan, Yang Fen, Wu Shufang, Lu Chunyue. Drawing Automatic Generation and Optimization based on Immune Genetic Algorithm [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2013, 34(2): 83-88. |
| [6] | HUANG Qi-liang, WANG Zong-yan, WU Shu-fang, QIN Hui-bin. Research on the Optimization of Engineering Drawings’ Adjusting Technology in Parametric Variant Design [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2011, 32(1): 168-173. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||