基于CiteSpace的国内外手术机器人交互设计分析比较研究

doi:10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026020251

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对手术机器人在人机交互设计领域的发展现状，开展了系统的比较与可视化研究。基于Web of Science和CNKI数据库，检索手术机器人交互设计相关文献，运用文献计量分析法与内容分析法，结合VOSviewer和CiteSpace的可视化功能，绘制知识图谱，从合作网络分布、研究热点主题和时区演化3个维度揭示手术机器人交互设计领域的研究格局与发展趋势。结果表明，国外手术机器人交互设计研究起步较早，各研究机构之间联系紧密，研究内容精细化，更关注技术驱动研发；相比之下，国内该领域研究起步较晚，研究机构之间互动相对较少，且研究内容较分散，侧重于理论研究和用户体验。研究指出，未来应强化跨学科协同创新，融合智能语音识别、高精度视觉与触觉数字化、运动轨迹智能规划、机器学习与大数据建模等前沿技术，以推动手术机器人交互设计的智能化、精确化与人性化发展。

关键词: 多模态人机交互设计, 知识图谱, 视觉触觉数字化, 机器学习, 运动轨迹智能规划

Abstract:

To address the current development status of surgical robot interaction design, a systematic comparative and visualized analysis was conducted. Based on the Web of Science and CNKI databases, literature related to surgical robot interaction design was retrieved. Bibliometric and content analysis methods were applied in combination with the visualization functions of VOSviewer and CiteSpace to construct knowledge maps. From three dimensions-collaboration network distribution, research hotspot themes, and temporal evolution the research landscape and development trends in this field were revealed. The results showed that international research on surgical robot interaction design had started earlier, with close institutional collaborations and more refined, technology-driven research focuses. In contrast, domestic research in this area was initiated later, with weaker institutional cooperation, more scattered topics, and a greater emphasis on theoretical exploration and user experience. It was concluded that future research should strengthen interdisciplinary collaborative innovation and integrate advanced technologies such as intelligent speech recognition, high-precision visual and haptic digitization, intelligent motion trajectory planning, machine learning, and big data modeling to promote the intelligent, precise, and human-centered development of surgical robot interaction design.

Key words: multimodal human-computer interaction design, knowledge mapping, visual-haptic digitization, machine learning, intelligent motion trajectory planning

中图分类号:

TP242
TH789

王一芮, 华馨怡, 汤天宇, 王奕霖, 闫祉祺, 耿子涵, 陈星宇, 杨建明, 孙博文. 基于CiteSpace的国内外手术机器人交互设计分析比较研究[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(2): 251-263.

WANG Yirui, HUA Xinyi, TANG Tianyu, WANG Yilin, YAN Zhiqi, GENG Zihan, CHEN Xingyu, YANG Jianming, SUN Bowen. A comparative analysis of domestic and international research on surgical robot interaction design using CiteSpace[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(2): 251-263.

图/表 13

图1 手术机器人交互设计研究方法结构图

Fig. 1 Research methodology framework of surgical robot interaction design

图2 手术机器人交互设计研究国家合作网络图谱

Fig. 2 National collaboration network map of research on surgical robot interaction design

图3 手术机器人交互设计发文机构共现图谱

Fig. 3 Co-authorship network map of institutions in surgical robot interaction design research

表1 排名前10名的手术机器人交互设计研究主要力量

Table 1 Top 10 leading contributors in surgical robot interaction design research

序号	国家	论文总数/篇	核心机构
1	美国	77	约翰斯·霍普金斯大学、哈佛大学医学院、普渡大学、内布拉斯加大学、斯坦福大学、华盛顿大学
2	中国	72	哈尔滨工业大学、中国科学院、上海交通大学、北京理工大学
3	意大利	30	米兰理工大学、比萨圣安娜大学、意大利技术研究院、比萨大学、佛罗伦萨大学
4	德国	24	慕尼黑工业大学、汉堡大学、德国宇航中心、弗朗霍夫海因里希赫兹研究所、德国人工智能研究中心
5	英国	17	伦敦大学学院、帝国理工学院、伦敦国王学院、伦敦玛丽女王大学、利兹大学
6	加拿大	15	不列颠哥伦比亚大学、阿尔伯塔大学、卡尔加里大学、西安大略大学、加拿大外科技术及先进机器人中心
7	日本	14	香川大学、庆应义塾大学、早稻田大学、国立千葉大学、神户大学
8	新加坡	12	新加坡国立大学、南洋理工大学、新加坡科技研究局、新加坡科技研究局高性能计算研究院、新加坡信息通信研究院
9	西班牙	9	马拉加大学、加泰罗尼亚理工大学、巴塞罗那自治大学、生物医学研究网络-生物工程、生物材料和纳米医学中心、加泰罗尼亚生物工程研究所
10	法国	7	国立巴黎高等矿业学院、西部癌症研究所、索邦大学、法国国家科学研究中心、巴黎第六大学

图4 国内手术机器人交互设计发文机构共现图谱

Fig. 4 Co-authorship network map of domestic institutions in surgical robot interaction design research

图5 国外手术机器人交互设计关键词共现图谱

Fig. 5 Keyword co-occurrence map of foreign research on surgical robot interaction design

表2 国外手术机器人交互设计高频关键词统计表

Table 2 Table of high-frequency keywords in foreign research on surgical robot interaction design

关键词	频次	总关联强度
Design	57	243
Surgical robotics	29	120
System	27	128
Minimally invasive surgery	25	125
Robot	19	70
Human-robot interaction	16	60
Feedback	15	71
Force control	15	70
Robotic surgery	14	54
Haptic feedback	12	68

图6 国内手术机器人交互设计关键词共现图谱

Fig. 6 Keyword co-occurrence map of domestic research on surgical robot interaction design

表3 国内手术机器人交互设计高频关键词统计表

Table 3 Table of high-frequency keywords in domestic research on surgical robot interaction design

关键词	频次	总关联强度
人机交互	20	46
虚拟现实	12	23
人工智能	8	17
用户体验	8	16
服务机器人	7	14
交互设计	6	7
力反馈	6	17
服务设计	6	8
碰撞检测	6	18
产品设计	5	9

图7 国内外手术机器人交互设计领域研究热点关系图

Fig. 7 Relationship map of research hotspots in domestic and foreign studies on surgical robot interaction design

图8 国外手术机器人交互设计关键词热点时区图谱

Fig. 8 Timeline visualization of keyword hotspots in foreign research on surgical robot interaction design

图9 国内手术机器人交互设计关键词热点时区图谱

Fig. 9 Timeline visualization of keyword hotspots in domestic research on surgical robot interaction design

图10 基于时区图谱的国内外手术机器人交互设计演化路径分析图

Fig. 10 Evolution path analysis of domestic and foreign surgical robot interaction design based on timeline visualization

参考文献 74

[1]	LIU X, IORDACHITA I I, HE X C, et al. Miniature fiber-optic force sensor based on low-coherence Fabry-Pérot interferometry for vitreoretinal microsurgery[J]. Biomedical Optics Express, 2012, 3(5): 1062-1076. DOI PMID
[2]	LI P, HOU X B, DUAN X G, et al. Appearance-based gaze estimator for natural interaction control of surgical robots[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 25095-25110. DOI URL
[3]	ABIDI H, GERBONI G, BRANCADORO M, et al. Highly dexterous 2-module soft robot for intra-organ navigation in minimally invasive surgery[J]. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2018, 14(1): e1875.
[4]	DU Z J, LIANG Y L, YAN Z Y, et al. Human-robot interaction control of a haptic master manipulator used in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgical robot system[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2021, 156: 104132. DOI URL
[5]	LONG Y H, WEI W, HUANG T, et al. Human-in-the-loop embodied intelligence with interactive simulation environment for surgical robot learning[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2023, 8(8): 4441-4448. DOI URL
[6]	ERSHAD M, REGE R, FEY A M. Automatic and near real-time stylistic behavior assessment in robotic surgery[J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2019, 14(4): 635-643. DOI PMID
[7]	MOCCIA S, FOTI S, ROUTRAY A, et al. Toward improving safety in neurosurgery with an active handheld instrument[J]. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2018, 46(10): 1450-1464. DOI PMID
[8]	SUN Y, JIANG Z L, QI X Z, et al. Robot-assisted decompressive laminectomy planning based on 3D medical image[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 22557-22569. DOI URL
[9]	YIN X C, GUO S X, SONG Y. Magnetorheological fluids actuated haptic-based teleoperated catheter operating system[J]. Micromachines, 2018, 9(9): 465. DOI URL
[10]	GONENC B, CHAE J, GEHLBACH P, et al. Towards robot-assisted retinal vein cannulation: a motorized force-sensing microneedle integrated with a handheld micromanipulator[J]. Sensors, 2017, 17(10): 2195. DOI URL
[11]	QI W, OVUR S E, LI Z J, et al. Multi-sensor guided hand gesture recognition for a teleoperated robot using a recurrent neural network[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2021, 6(3): 6039-6045. DOI URL
[12]	POON C C Y, LEUNG E Y Y, LAU K C, et al. A novel user-specific wearable controller for surgical robots[C]//The 4th International Conference on Design, User Experience, and Usability:Interactive Experience Design. Cham: Springer, 2015: 693-701.
[13]	SU H, QI W, SCHMIRANDER Y, et al. A human activity-aware shared control solution for medical human-robot interaction[J]. Assembly Automation, 2022, 42(3): 388-394. DOI URL
[14]	BARRESI G, OLIVIERI E, CALDWELL D G, et al. Brain-controlled AR feedback design for user’s training in surgical HRI[C]// 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. New York: IEEE Press, 2015: 1116-1121.
[15]	孔康. 一体式微创外科手术机器人机构设计及研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2012.
	KONG K. Mechanism design and research of an integrated minimally invasive surgical robot[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2012 (in Chinese).
[16]	刘生辉. 采用压电惯性驱动的二自由度穿刺针及其运动控制研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.
	LIU S H. A 2-DOF insertion needle using inertia piezoelectric actuator and motion control[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020 (in Chinese).
[17]	李博维. 手部力反馈装置及系统研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2016.
	LI B W. Research of hand force feedback device and system[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2016 (in Chinese).
[18]	LLOYD P, ONAIZAH O, PITTIGLIO G, et al. Magnetic soft continuum robots with braided reinforcement[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022, 7(4): 9770-9777. DOI URL
[19]	WEBSTER R J, OKAMURA A M, COWAN N J. Toward active cannulas: miniature snake-like surgical robots[C]// 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. New York: IEEE Press, 2006: 2857-2863.
[20]	HUAN Y, TAMADON I, SCATENA C, et al. Soft graspers for safe and effective tissue clutching in minimally invasive surgery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2021, 68(1): 56-67. DOI URL
[21]	GIFARI M W, NAGHIBI H, STRAMIGIOLI S, et al. A review on recent advances in soft surgical robots for endoscopic applications[J]. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2019, 15(5): e2010.
[22]	CHINZEI K, KIKINIS R, JOLESZ F A. MR compatibility of mechatronic devices: design criteria[C]// The 2nd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention - MICCAI’99. Cham: Springer, 1999: 1020-1030.
[23]	ZHANG X D, LIU H C, WANG Y C, et al. FBG-based three-dimensional micro-force sensor with axial force sensitivity-enhancing and temperature compensation for micro-forceps[J]. Optics Express, 2023, 31(24): 40538-40556. DOI PMID
[24]	AUBEELUCK D A, FORBRIGGER C, TAROMSARI S M, et al. Screen-printed resistive tactile sensor for monitoring tissue interaction forces on a surgical magnetic microgripper[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2023, 15(28): 34008-34022.
[25]	SAINI S, ORLANDO M F, PATHAK P M. Adaptive control of a master-slave based robotic surgical system with haptic feedback[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 1125-1138. DOI URL
[26]	LOSEY D P, MCDONALD C G, BATTAGLIA E, et al. A review of intent detection, arbitration, and communication aspects of shared control for physical human-robot interaction[J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2018, 70(1): 010804. DOI URL
[27]	SHI H, ZHANG B Y, MEI X S, et al. Realization of force detection and feedback control for slave manipulator of master/slave surgical robot[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(22): 7489. DOI URL
[28]	LI L, LI X J, DING S, et al. SIRNet: fine-grained surgical interaction recognition[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022, 7(2): 4212-4219. DOI URL
[29]	FORTE M P, GOURISHETTI R, JAVOT B, et al. Design of interactive augmented reality functions for robotic surgery and evaluation in dry-lab lymphadenectomy[J]. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2022, 18(2): e2351.
[30]	SHI C Y, LUO X B, QI P, et al. Shape sensing techniques for continuum robots in minimally invasive surgery: a survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2017, 64(8): 1665-1678. DOI URL
[31]	PITTIGLIO G, LLOYD P, DA VEIGA T, et al. Patient-specific magnetic catheters for atraumatic autonomous endoscopy[J]. Soft Robotics, 2022, 9(6): 1120-1133. DOI PMID
[32]	MIURA S, OHTA R, CAO Y, et al. Using operator gaze tracking to design wrist mechanism for surgical robots[J]. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 2021, 51(4): 376-383. DOI URL
[33]	LEE H C, PACHECO N E, FICHERA L, et al. When the end effector is a laser: a review of robotics in laser surgery[J]. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 2022, 4(10): 2200130. DOI URL
[34]	MAO L Y, YANG P, TIAN C Y, et al. Magnetic steering continuum robot for transluminal procedures with programmable shape and functionalities[J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15(1): 3759. DOI PMID
[35]	CUI Z Q, YU Y K, WANG H X. Recent developments in impedance-based tactile sensors: a review[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2024, 24(3): 2350-2366. DOI URL
[36]	JIANG S, LI P, YU Y, et al. Experimental study of needle-tissue interaction forces: effect of needle geometries, insertion methods and tissue characteristics[J]. Journal of Biomechanics, 2014, 47(13): 3344-3353. DOI PMID
[37]	MAALOUF N, SIDAOUI A, ELHAJJ I H, et al. Robotics in nursing: a scoping review[J]. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 2018, 50(6): 590-600. DOI PMID
[38]	VAN LEWEN D, JANKE T, LEE H, et al. A millimeter-scale soft robot for tissue biopsy procedures[J]. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 2023, 5(5): 2200326. DOI URL
[39]	SCHLENK C, HAGMANN K, STEIDLE F, et al. A robotic system for solo surgery in flexible ureteroscopy: development and evaluation with clinical users[J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2023, 18(9): 1559-1569. DOI PMID
[40]	BRAVI C A, ROSIELLO G, MAZZONE E, et al. The IRON study: investigation of robot-assisted versus open nephron-sparing surgery[J]. European Urology Open Science, 2023, 49: 71-77. DOI PMID
[41]	YEN P L, HO T H. Shared control for a handheld orthopedic surgical robot[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2021, 6(4): 8394-8400. DOI URL
[42]	赵浩, 李林, 刘宏. 智能机器人PengPeng Ⅱ的系统集成与性能测试[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(S2): 81-84.
	ZHAO H, LI L, LIU H. System integration and performance testing of the intelligent robot PengPeng II[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science & Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 39(S2): 81-84 (in Chinese).
[43]	王时惠, 吕佳辉, 张军, 等. ICU患者温控人机智能协同系统设计研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 36(5): 156-160.
	WANG S H, LV J H, ZHANG J, et al. ICU patient temperature control human-intelligent collaboration system design research[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Social Sciences), 2022, 36(5): 156-160 (in Chinese).
[44]	李敏, 于佳慧, 张鑫磊, 等. 面向人机协作的新型交互方式应用研究[J]. 人类工效学, 2022, 28(5): 19-24.
	LI M, YU J H, ZHANG X L, et al. New human-machine interaction applications for human-machine collaboration[J]. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 2022, 28(5): 19-24 (in Chinese).
[45]	朱振中, 郑国焱, 张长青. 机器人辅助技术在创伤骨科的发展与临床应用[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022, 36(8): 915-922.
	ZHU Z Z, ZHENG G Y, ZHANG C Q. Development and clinical application of robot-assisted technology in traumatic orthopedics[J]. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2022, 36(8): 915-922 (in Chinese).
[46]	梁艺, 汪步云, 陈友东, 等. 前列腺靶向放疗机器人系统设计及实验研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(12): 13-19.
	LIANG Y, WANG B Y, CHEN Y D, et al. Design and experimental study of robot system for prostate brachytherapy[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science & Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(12): 13-19 (in Chinese).
[47]	谷文慧, 周橙旻. 服务设计视角下老年诊疗流程优化设计[J]. 家具, 2022, 43(4): 78-83.
	GU W H, ZHOU C M. Optimum design of treatment process for the elderly based on service design[J]. Furniture, 2022, 43(4): 78-83 (in Chinese).
[48]	钱英, 孙小磊. 人工智能与大数据在临床工程中的应用与挑战[J]. 华西医学, 2019, 34(6): 607-611.
	QIAN Y, SUN X L. The application and challenge of artificial intelligence and big data in clinical engineering[J]. West China Medical Journal, 2019, 34(6): 607-611 (in Chinese).
[49]	陈鹤, 陆晓和. 人工智能时代下眼科诊疗的变革——以早产儿视网膜病变为例[J]. 医学与哲学, 2018, 39(10B): 53-58.
	CHEN H, LU X H. Artificial intelligence causes a revolution in ophthalmology: retinopathy of prematurity as an example[J]. Medicine & Philosophy, 2018, 39(10B): 53-58 (in Chinese).
[50]	彭琼. 人性化设计指导下的家用机器人设计探讨[J]. 艺术与设计(理论), 2009(2): 151-153.
	PENG Q. The discussion of household robot design under the instruction of user friendly design[J]. Art and Design, 2009(2): 151-153 (in Chinese).
[51]	邵彩萍, 胡北. 5G+智慧医疗服务平台的交互设计与具体产品应用研究[J]. 湖北工程学院学报, 2022, 42(2): 96-104.
	SHAO C P, HU B. Research on interaction design of 5G+ smart medical service platform and application of specific products[J]. Journal of Hubei Engineering University, 2022, 42(2): 96-104 (in Chinese).
[52]	郭博文, 秦华, 王丽, 等. 基于椎板减压手术机器人的信息交互界面评价[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(15): 6217-6224.
	GUO B W, QIN H, WANG L, et al. Evaluation of information interaction interface based on vertebral plate decompression surgical robot[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2024, 24(15): 6217-6224 (in Chinese).
[53]	夏甫开提·阿力甫, 周京涛, 努尔比亚吾素因, 等. 基于边缘计算的医疗资源配置重构优化模型构建[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2022, 39(11): 1407-1411.
	ALIFU X, ZHOU J T, NUERBIYAWUSUYIN, et al. Reconfiguration and optimization model for medical resource allocation based on edge computing[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Physics, 2022, 39(11): 1407-1411 (in Chinese).
[54]	李晓玲, 刘子荧, 莫泽宇, 等. 医疗装备产品研发中的人机交互和创新设计[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(20): 65-76.
	LI X L, LIU Z Y, MO Z Y, et al. Human-computer interaction and innovative design in the development of medical equipment products[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44(20): 65-76 (in Chinese).
[55]	郑祎峰, 王佳春, 王谨, 等. 基于人机交互技术的工业产品数字化系统分析评测[J]. 现代电子技术, 2021, 44(13): 182-186.
	ZHENG Y F, WANG J C, WANG J, et al. Analysis and evaluation of industrial product digital system based on man-machine interaction technology[J]. Modern Electronics Technique, 2021, 44(13): 182-186 (in Chinese).
[56]	张玉兰, 杜羽. 多自由度包装机器人人机交互控制方法[J]. 包装工程, 2021, 42(15): 239-244.
	ZHANG Y L, DU Y. Human-computer interaction control method for multi-degree of freedom packaging robot[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2021, 42(15): 239-244 (in Chinese).
[57]	师国伟, 王中天, 王聪, 等. 辅助穿刺机器人临床操作人因分析及优化研究[J]. 空军航空医学, 2023, 40(1): 79-81. DOI
	SHI G W, WANG Z T, WANG C, et al. Human factors analysis and optimization of clinical operation of an assistive puncture robot[J]. Aviation Medicine of Air Force, 2023, 40(1): 79-81 (in Chinese).
[58]	代煜, 张建勋, 雪原. 基于小波变换的脊柱振动特征分析[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2012, 31(3): 461-465.
	DAI Y, ZHANG J X, XUE Y. Vibration feature analysis for spine using wavelet transform[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2012, 31(3): 461-465 (in Chinese).
[59]	孟繁森, 辛绍杰, 桑成松. 微创机器人手术器械研究进展[J]. 上海电机学院学报, 2020, 23(2): 76-86, 92.
	MENG F S, XIN S J, SANG C S. Research progress of surgical instruments for minimally invasive robotic surgery[J]. Journal of Shanghai Dianji University, 2020, 23(2): 76-86, 92 (in Chinese).
[60]	左美云, 沈原燕杭, 刘妃. 智慧健康养老领域接入元宇宙的方式与问题研究[J]. 科技智囊, 2023(1): 55-65.
	ZUO M Y, SHEN Y Y H, LIU F. Study on the ways of accessing the metaverse and its existing problems in the field of smart healthy and senior care[J]. Think Tank of Science & Technology, 2023(1): 55-65 (in Chinese).
[61]	WAGNER A. Recursive design of dependable robot systems for safety-critical applications[M]//RODIĆ A, PISLA D, BLEULER H. New Trends in Medical and Service Robots: Challenges and Solutions. Cham: Springer, 2014: 209-226.
[62]	RAFII-TARI H, PAYNE C J, LIU J D, et al. Towards automated surgical skill evaluation of endovascular catheterization tasks based on force and motion signatures[C]// 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. New York: IEEE Press, 2015: 1789-1794.
[63]	MORIMOTO A K, FORAL R D, KUHLMAN J L, et al. Force sensor for laparoscopic babcock[J]. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 1997, 39: 354-361. PMID
[64]	TAVAKOLI M, PATEL R V, MOALLEM M. Bilateral control of a teleoperator for soft tissue palpation: design and experiments[C]// 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. New York: IEEE Press, 2006: 3280-3285.
[65]	NGUYEN Q C, KIM Y, KWON H. Optimization of layout and path planning of surgical robotic system[J]. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2017, 15(1): 375-384. DOI URL
[66]	YOON S M, KIM W J, LEE M C. Design of bilateral control for force feedback in surgical robot[J]. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2015, 13(4): 916-925. DOI URL
[67]	SHENG Y B, CHENG H Y, WANG Y W, et al. Teleoperated surgical robot with adaptive interactive control architecture for tissue identification[J]. Bioengineering, 2023, 10(10): 1157. DOI URL
[68]	王党校, 张玉茹, 王永光, 等. 机器人辅助内镜手术系统的设计与开发[J]. 机器人, 2002, 24(4): 335-341.
	WANG D X, ZHANG Y R, WANG Y G, et al. Design and development of robot-assisted endoscope surgery system[J]. Robot, 2002, 24(4): 335-341 (in Chinese).
[69]	张忠林, 陈以, 俞益. 穿刺手术机器人遥操作系统的控制策略研究[J]. 微型机与应用, 2014, 33(12): 73-75.
	ZHANG Z L, CHEN Y, YU Y. Control strategy research of puncture surgery robotic teleoperation system[J]. Microcomputer & Its Applications, 2014, 33(12): 73-75 (in Chinese).
[70]	奉振球, 侯增广, 边桂彬, 等. 微创血管介入手术机器人的主从交互控制方法与实现[J]. 自动化学报, 2016, 42(5): 696-705.
	FENG Z Q, HOU Z G, BIAN G B, et al. Master-slave interactive control and implementation for minimally invasive vascular interventional robots[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2016, 42(5): 696-705 (in Chinese).
[71]	李璧江, 张学军, 韦涛, 等. 基于虚拟现实的腹部手术仿真系统研究[J]. 医疗卫生装备, 2020, 41(8): 19-24, 44.
	LI B J, ZHANG X J, WEI T, et al. Research on virtual simulation system of abdominal surgery[J]. Chinese Medical Equipment Journal, 2020, 41(8): 19-24, 44 (in Chinese).
[72]	黄旭华, 徐金明, 王新, 等. 智能化胸外科专科专病机器人的研发与前景[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2022, 29(9): 1210-1216.
	HUANG X H, XU J M, WANG X, et al. Development and prospect of intelligent specialized disease-specific robots for thoracic surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2022, 29(9): 1210-1216 (in Chinese).
[73]	付一凡, 翁桂湖, 曹喆, 等. 人工智能在胰腺癌诊疗中的应用[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2024, 15(4): 747-750.
	FU Y F, WENG G H, CAO Z, et al. Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(4): 747-750 (in Chinese).
[74]	韩晓光, 朱小龙, 姜宇桢, 等. 人工智能与机器人辅助医学发展研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2023, 25(5): 43-54. DOI
	HAN X G, ZHU X L, JIANG Y Z, et al. Development strategies for artificial intelligence and robotics in medicine[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2023, 25(5): 43-54 (in Chinese). DOI