图学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 766-775.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026040766
唐晓腾1,2, 姚君1(
), 胡鹤凡3, 邵将1, 束云峰2
收稿日期:2025-12-23
接受日期:2026-04-28
出版日期:2026-08-31
发布日期:2026-08-31
通讯作者:姚君,E-mail:yaojun@cumt.edu.cn基金资助:
TANG Xiaoteng1,2, YAO Jun1(
), HU Hefan3, SHAO Jiang1, SHU Yunfeng2
Received:2025-12-23
Accepted:2026-04-28
Published:2026-08-31
Online:2026-08-31
Contact:
YAO Jun,E-mail:yaojun@cumt.edu.cnSupported by:摘要:
眼控交互作为一种基于视线行为的自然交互方式,凭借快捷、直观和解放双手等特性,在虚拟现实(VR)场景下的目标选择任务中展现出明显的交互效率与沉浸体验提升潜力。已有研究大多采用凝视、平滑追踪和眼势等输入方式,利用预设的输入参数和界面布局来完成实现目标触发,但在目标选择过程中普遍采用固定的停留时间和激活区域设置,忽略了个体差异和状态变化对眼动模式的影响,易造成误触率增加、触发效率降低。因此,本研究从用户交互意图角度出发,在VR环境中设计了5种典型眼控任务场景,采集任务绩效、眼动行为及主观意图标注数据,并构建多源眼动特征空间。基于该数据集,分别构建并评估了五类基于静态特征的传统机器学习模型(SVM,LR,RF,LightGBM,MLP)和三类时序深度模型(Bi-LSTM,1D CNN,CNN-LSTM),通过被试独立的五折交叉验证与独立测试集进行性能比较,并结合在线推理时延与模型体积等部署指标综合筛选出基于 LightGBM 的用户选择意图识别模型。结果表明,该模型在识别精度、推理效率与实际部署可行性之间取得了较优平衡,可为VR眼控界面中的实时意图识别、自适应触发机制及个性化交互设计提供方法支撑。
中图分类号:
唐晓腾, 姚君, 胡鹤凡, 邵将, 束云峰. 虚拟现实环境下多类型眼控选择任务的用户意图识别模型研究[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(4): 766-775.
TANG Xiaoteng, YAO Jun, HU Hefan, SHAO Jiang, SHU Yunfeng. User intention recognition for multi-type gaze-based target selection tasks in virtual reality[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(4): 766-775.
图3 每种任务下的实验素材((a) 图标触发;(b) 文本触发;(c) 提示词触发;(d) 图像触发)
Fig. 3 Experimental stimuli for each task ((a) Icon-triggered task; (b) Text-triggered task; (c) Prompt word-triggered task; (d) Image-triggered task)
| 任务 | 正类(准确率/%) | 负类(准确率/%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 574(83.92) | 110(16.08) |
| 2 | 398(82.23) | 86(17.77) |
| 3 | 479(64.38) | 265(35.62) |
| 4 | 549(80.15) | 136(19.85) |
| 5 | 0 | 754(100) |
表1 眼动数据集统计
Table 1 Statistics of the eye-tracking dataset
| 任务 | 正类(准确率/%) | 负类(准确率/%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 574(83.92) | 110(16.08) |
| 2 | 398(82.23) | 86(17.77) |
| 3 | 479(64.38) | 265(35.62) |
| 4 | 549(80.15) | 136(19.85) |
| 5 | 0 | 754(100) |
| 类型 | 特征 | 数量 |
|---|---|---|
| 基础眼动 | 凝视时间、凝视密度 | 2 |
| 瞳孔直径 | 统计特征 (正值、负值、绝对值、总体值) | 20 |
| 趋势特征 | 9 | |
| 变化率特征 | 9 | |
| 凝视坐标 | 统计特征(X,Y坐标) | 40 |
| 趋势特征(X,Y坐标) | 142 | |
| 变化率特征(X,Y坐标) | 142 |
表2 眼动数据中提取的特征维度汇总
Table 2 Summary of feature dimensions extracted from eye-tracking data
| 类型 | 特征 | 数量 |
|---|---|---|
| 基础眼动 | 凝视时间、凝视密度 | 2 |
| 瞳孔直径 | 统计特征 (正值、负值、绝对值、总体值) | 20 |
| 趋势特征 | 9 | |
| 变化率特征 | 9 | |
| 凝视坐标 | 统计特征(X,Y坐标) | 40 |
| 趋势特征(X,Y坐标) | 142 | |
| 变化率特征(X,Y坐标) | 142 |
| 模型 | AUC | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | 0.938 ± 0.012 | 0.873 ± 0.016 | 0.870 ± 0.013 | 0.917 ± 0.021 | 0.893 ± 0.014 |
| LR | 0.924 ± 0.016 | 0.864 ± 0.016 | 0.865 ± 0.025 | 0.907 ± 0.015 | 0.885 ± 0.012 |
| RF | 0.951 ± 0.007 | 0.893 ± 0.010 | 0.880 ± 0.012 | 0.944 ± 0.005 | 0.911 ± 0.008 |
| LightGBM | 0.958 ± 0.008 | 0.900 ± 0.021 | 0.897 ± 0.040 | 0.937 ± 0.021 | 0.916 ± 0.016 |
| MLP | 0.928 ± 0.009 | 0.890 ± 0.005 | 0.890 ± 0.011 | 0.924 ± 0.011 | 0.907 ± 0.005 |
| Bi-LSTM | 0.946 ± 0.010 | 0.872 ± 0.010 | 0.914 ± 0.024 | 0.860 ± 0.013 | 0.886 ± 0.010 |
| 1D CNN | 0.960 ± 0.009 | 0.912 ± 0.010 | 0.921 ± 0.016 | 0.928 ± 0.014 | 0.924 ± 0.010 |
| CNN-LSTM | 0.961 ± 0.008 | 0.912 ± 0.009 | 0.925 ± 0.015 | 0.922 ± 0.017 | 0.923 ± 0.009 |
表3 8种模型五折交叉验证性能比较
Table 3 Performance comparison of eight models using five-fold cross-validation
| 模型 | AUC | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | 0.938 ± 0.012 | 0.873 ± 0.016 | 0.870 ± 0.013 | 0.917 ± 0.021 | 0.893 ± 0.014 |
| LR | 0.924 ± 0.016 | 0.864 ± 0.016 | 0.865 ± 0.025 | 0.907 ± 0.015 | 0.885 ± 0.012 |
| RF | 0.951 ± 0.007 | 0.893 ± 0.010 | 0.880 ± 0.012 | 0.944 ± 0.005 | 0.911 ± 0.008 |
| LightGBM | 0.958 ± 0.008 | 0.900 ± 0.021 | 0.897 ± 0.040 | 0.937 ± 0.021 | 0.916 ± 0.016 |
| MLP | 0.928 ± 0.009 | 0.890 ± 0.005 | 0.890 ± 0.011 | 0.924 ± 0.011 | 0.907 ± 0.005 |
| Bi-LSTM | 0.946 ± 0.010 | 0.872 ± 0.010 | 0.914 ± 0.024 | 0.860 ± 0.013 | 0.886 ± 0.010 |
| 1D CNN | 0.960 ± 0.009 | 0.912 ± 0.010 | 0.921 ± 0.016 | 0.928 ± 0.014 | 0.924 ± 0.010 |
| CNN-LSTM | 0.961 ± 0.008 | 0.912 ± 0.009 | 0.925 ± 0.015 | 0.922 ± 0.017 | 0.923 ± 0.009 |
| Model | AUC | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-score | 模型大小/MB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | 0.951 | 0.890 | 0.880 | 0.939 | 0.908 | 3.01 |
| LR | 0.947 | 0.885 | 0.889 | 0.915 | 0.902 | 0.02 |
| RF | 0.963 | 0.911 | 0.885 | 0.971 | 0.926 | 1.25 |
| LightGBM | 0.970 | 0.944 | 0.935 | 0.971 | 0.953 | 0.35 |
| MLP | 0.935 | 0.892 | 0.904 | 0.909 | 0.907 | 4.34 |
| Bi-LSTM | 0.951 | 0.877 | 0.916 | 0.866 | 0.890 | 0.37 |
| 1D CNN | 0.967 | 0.909 | 0.919 | 0.924 | 0.921 | 3.08 |
| CNN-LSTM | 0.968 | 0.924 | 0.926 | 0.933 | 0.934 | 2.86 |
表4 8种模型测试集性能比较
Table 4 Test-set performance comparison of the eight models
| Model | AUC | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-score | 模型大小/MB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | 0.951 | 0.890 | 0.880 | 0.939 | 0.908 | 3.01 |
| LR | 0.947 | 0.885 | 0.889 | 0.915 | 0.902 | 0.02 |
| RF | 0.963 | 0.911 | 0.885 | 0.971 | 0.926 | 1.25 |
| LightGBM | 0.970 | 0.944 | 0.935 | 0.971 | 0.953 | 0.35 |
| MLP | 0.935 | 0.892 | 0.904 | 0.909 | 0.907 | 4.34 |
| Bi-LSTM | 0.951 | 0.877 | 0.916 | 0.866 | 0.890 | 0.37 |
| 1D CNN | 0.967 | 0.909 | 0.919 | 0.924 | 0.921 | 3.08 |
| CNN-LSTM | 0.968 | 0.924 | 0.926 | 0.933 | 0.934 | 2.86 |
| 模型 | 单个样本平均推理时间/ms | 模型大小/MB | F1-score (测试集) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LightGBM | 42.04 | 0.35 | 0.953 |
| 1D CNN | 154.12 | 3.08 | 0.921 |
| CNN-LSTM | 145.15 | 2.86 | 0.934 |
表5 3种模型的部署效果对比
Table 5 Deployment performance comparison of the three models
| 模型 | 单个样本平均推理时间/ms | 模型大小/MB | F1-score (测试集) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LightGBM | 42.04 | 0.35 | 0.953 |
| 1D CNN | 154.12 | 3.08 | 0.921 |
| CNN-LSTM | 145.15 | 2.86 | 0.934 |
| [1] | BAO Y W, WANG J X, WANG Z M, et al. Exploring 3D interaction with gaze guidance in augmented reality[C]// 2023 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). New York: IEEE Press, 2023: 22-32. |
| [2] |
HUANG L D, WESTIN T, ELADHARI M P, et al. Eyes can draw: a high-fidelity free-eye drawing method with unimodal gaze control[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2023, 170: 102966.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
GARDONY A L, OKANO K, HUGHES G I, et al. Characterizing information access needs in gaze-adaptive augmented reality interfaces: implications for fast-paced and dynamic usage contexts[J]. Human-Computer Interaction, 2024, 39(5/6): 553-583.
DOI URL |
| [4] | MENGES R, KUMAR C, SENGUPTA K, et al. eyeGUI: a novel framework for eye-controlled user interfaces[C]// The 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. New York: ACM, 2016: 121. |
| [5] | 杨晓楠, 王帅, 牛红伟, 等. 眼动交互关键技术研究现状与展望[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2024, 30(5): 1595-1609. |
| YANG X N, WANG S, NIU H W, et al. Research status and prospects of key technologies of eye-based interaction[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2024, 30(5): 1595-1609 (in Chinese). | |
| [6] |
WANG Y Y, TIAN J Z, XIAO L, et al. Research on a spatial-temporal characterisation of blink-triggered eye control interactions[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2024, 59: 102297.
DOI URL |
| [7] | ADEBAYO S, MCLOONE S, DESSING J C. Hand-eye-object tracking for human intention inference[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2022, 55(15): 174-179. |
| [8] |
JANG Y M, MALLIPEDDI R, LEE S, et al. Human intention recognition based on eyeball movement pattern and pupil size variation[J]. Neurocomputing, 2014, 128: 421-432.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
CHEN X J, TANG X T, CHEN Y H, et al. Enhancing fixation and pursuit: optimizing field of view and number of targets for selection performance in virtual reality[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2025, 41(2): 1221-1233.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
TANG X T, CHEN X J, LENG H X, et al. Comparison and optimization of target-assisted gaze input technique for enhanced selection in virtual eye-controlled systems[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2026, 42(1): 239-257.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
NIU Y F, LI X, YANG W J, et al. Smooth pursuit study on an eye-control system for continuous variable adjustment tasks[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2023, 39(1): 23-33.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
梁永强, 王崴, 瞿珏, 等. 基于眼动特征的人机交互行为意图预测模型[J]. 电子学报, 2018, 46(12): 2993-3001.
DOI |
| LIANG Y Q, WANG W, QU J, et al. Human-computer interaction behavior and intention prediction model based on eye movement characteristics[J]. Acta electronica sinica, 2018, 46(12): 2993-3001 (in Chinese). | |
| [13] | 侯冠华, 周蓥滢. 交互模态与任务类型对用户交互绩效的影响[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2025, 37(2): 330-339. |
| HOU G H, ZHOU Y Y. The effect of interaction modality and task type on user interaction efficiency[J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2025, 37(2): 330-339 (in Chinese). | |
| [14] | JANG Y M, LEE S, MALLIPEDDI R, et al. Recognition of human’s implicit intention based on an eyeball movement pattern analysis[C]// The 18th International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Cham: Springer, 2011: 138-145. |
| [15] |
KRAUSZ N E, LAMOTTE D, BATZIANOULIS I, et al. Intent prediction based on biomechanical coordination of EMG and vision-filtered gaze for end-point control of an arm prosthesis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2020, 28(6): 1471-1480.
DOI PMID |
| [16] |
QU J, GUO H, WANG W, et al. Prediction of human-computer interaction intention based on eye movement and electroencephalograph characteristics[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13: 816127.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
AWAIS M, SAEED M Y, MALIK M S A, et al. Intention based comparative analysis of human-robot interaction[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 205821-205835.
DOI URL |
| [18] | 胡志明, 李胜, 盖孟. 用户任务预测研究进展与算法分析[J]. 图学学报, 2021, 42(3): 367-375. |
| HU Z M, LI S, GAI M. Research progress of user task prediction and algorithm analysis[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2021, 42(3): 367-375 (in Chinese). | |
| [19] |
PAN Y X, XU J. Gaze-based human intention prediction in the hybrid foraging search task[J]. Neurocomputing, 2024, 587: 127648.
DOI URL |
| [20] | ISOMOTO T, YAMANAKA S, SHIZUKI B. Dwell selection with ML-based intent prediction using only gaze data[J]. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2022, 6(3): 120. |
| [21] |
KOOCHAKI F, NAJAFIZADEH L. A data-driven framework for intention prediction via eye movement with applications to assistive systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2021, 29: 974-984.
DOI URL |
| [22] | REDDY G S R, PROULX M J, HIRSHFIELD L, et al. Towards an eye-brain-computer interface: combining gaze with the stimulus-preceding negativity for target selections in XR[C]// 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 2024: 376. |
| [23] | MINIOTAS D. Application of Fitts’ law to eye gaze interaction[C]// CHI ’00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 2000: 339-340. |
| [24] |
FERNANDES A S, MURDISON T S, PROULX M J. Leveling the playing field: a comparative reevaluation of unmodified eye tracking as an input and interaction modality for VR[J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2023, 29(5): 2269-2279.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
YANG S, KIM J, JANG J, et al. Improving probability-based prompt selection through unified evaluation and analysis[J]. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024, 12: 664-680.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 温瑞祺, 吕健, 宋定安, 苏乐, 梁智斌. 具身视域下康复训练虚拟现实系统设计与评估[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(4): 776-787. |
| [2] | 纪海林, 张怡冉, 李亦航, 张鸿文, 骆岩红. 用于沉浸式物理实验的半实物交互技术[J]. 图学学报, 2026, 47(3): 598-606. |
| [3] | 张雨菲, 丁玎, 李竹颖. 基于情绪捕捉实现艺术再创造的虚拟现实体验[J]. 图学学报, 2025, 46(4): 775-782. |
| [4] | 杜欣, 任洋甫, 胥森哲, 王巨宏, 郑宇飞, 张松海. 虚拟现实重定向行走中的场景缩放增益研究[J]. 图学学报, 2025, 46(4): 793-806. |
| [5] | 朱晓强, 杨伊菲. 虚拟现实环境下的自由雕刻系统[J]. 图学学报, 2025, 46(2): 345-357. |
| [6] | 张婷, 赖建都, 侯冠华, 张晶晶. 眼控速度与目标移动距离对用户交互绩效的影响[J]. 图学学报, 2025, 46(1): 233-240. |
| [7] | 杨浩中, 孔笑宇, 辜睿坤, 汪淼. 虚拟现实中的大模型技术研究进展与趋势[J]. 图学学报, 2024, 45(6): 1117-1131. |
| [8] | 栾帅, 吴健, 樊润泽, 王莉莉. 基于观察质量场的虚拟对象协同操作方法[J]. 图学学报, 2024, 45(6): 1338-1348. |
| [9] | 任洋甫, 于歌, 傅月瑶, 胥森哲, 何煜, 王巨宏, 张松海. 虚拟现实中场景和时间对用户空间方向认知的影响[J]. 图学学报, 2024, 45(6): 1349-1363. |
| [10] | 严家豪, 吕健, 侯宇康, 莫心祝. 虚拟现实中眼动交互频率对视觉疲劳影响的研究[J]. 图学学报, 2024, 45(3): 528-538. |
| [11] | 王浩淼, 桑胜举, 段晓东, 张伟华, 陶体伟, 马婷. 虚拟现实环境下的协同式三维建模方法[J]. 图学学报, 2024, 45(1): 169-182. |
| [12] | 韩兆阳, 翁冬冬, 郭署山, 贺文杰, 江海燕, 李冬. 一种基于简易标记点编码的光学跟踪系统[J]. 图学学报, 2023, 44(5): 997-1012. |
| [13] | 谢红霞, 胡毓宁, 张赟, 王亚奇, 杜辉, 秦爱红. 全景图像视频的场景分析与内容处理方法综述[J]. 图学学报, 2023, 44(4): 640-657. |
| [14] | 朱永宁 , 葛 婷 , 杜盛瑀 , 楼泽如 , 王建民 . 虚拟现实全景流体绘画系统的可用性研究[J]. 图学学报, 2021, 42(5): 833-840. |
| [15] | 赵建军, 黄竣鹏, 陈俊良. 基于 Leap Motion 的电影前期预演 人机交互方法[J]. 图学学报, 2021, 42(1): 71-78. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||