Journal of Graphics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 1041-1049.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2023051041
• Industrial Design • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Zheng-cun(), WU Tong(
), DUN Xiao-rong
Received:
2023-05-12
Accepted:
2023-08-30
Online:
2023-10-31
Published:
2023-10-31
Contact:
WU Tong (1975-), associate professor, Ph.D. His main research interests cover product design and computer aided technology. E-mail:About author:
WU Zheng-cun (1999-), master student. His main research interests cover industrial design, computer graphics. E-mail:18513253866@163.com
Supported by:
CLC Number:
WU Zheng-cun, WU Tong, DUN Xiao-rong. Research on design method of Chengcheng embroidery style migration based on extension semantics[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2023, 44(5): 1041-1049.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.txxb.com.cn/EN/10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2023051041
类别 | 名称 | 造型 | 释义 | 特征词 |
---|---|---|---|---|
繁衍生息 | 莲与子 | ![]() ![]() | 莲花在纹饰中暗喻女性,而莲花中的 “子”则指代娃娃或贵子。常见的纹 样包括孕子莲、露子莲等 | 美满、幸福、 爱情、富裕、 生命繁衍 |
鱼戏莲 | ![]() ![]() | 鱼常被视为男性的象征,常见的图案 有鱼戏莲、鱼穿莲、鱼儿闹莲、双鱼 闹莲、四鱼闹莲、群鱼闹莲等 | 吉庆、美满、 恩爱、幸福、 繁衍 | |
镇妖辟邪 | 虎头帽 | ![]() ![]() | 虎头帽以镇妖辟邪的方式表达对生存 的期望,这种对死的恐惧和生的渴求, 在虎头帽上完充分地展现出来 | 保护、辟邪、 健康、平安、 吉祥 |
祈福吉祥 | 凤戏牡丹 | ![]() ![]() | 凤戏牡丹的图案用代表吉祥如意、幸 福美满的凤凰、牡丹等装饰纹样表达 对生活美好的祈求和未来美好的祈愿 | 尊贵、圆满、 吉祥、灵动、 坚贞 |
Table 1 Chengcheng embroidery pattern meaning
类别 | 名称 | 造型 | 释义 | 特征词 |
---|---|---|---|---|
繁衍生息 | 莲与子 | ![]() ![]() | 莲花在纹饰中暗喻女性,而莲花中的 “子”则指代娃娃或贵子。常见的纹 样包括孕子莲、露子莲等 | 美满、幸福、 爱情、富裕、 生命繁衍 |
鱼戏莲 | ![]() ![]() | 鱼常被视为男性的象征,常见的图案 有鱼戏莲、鱼穿莲、鱼儿闹莲、双鱼 闹莲、四鱼闹莲、群鱼闹莲等 | 吉庆、美满、 恩爱、幸福、 繁衍 | |
镇妖辟邪 | 虎头帽 | ![]() ![]() | 虎头帽以镇妖辟邪的方式表达对生存 的期望,这种对死的恐惧和生的渴求, 在虎头帽上完充分地展现出来 | 保护、辟邪、 健康、平安、 吉祥 |
祈福吉祥 | 凤戏牡丹 | ![]() ![]() | 凤戏牡丹的图案用代表吉祥如意、幸 福美满的凤凰、牡丹等装饰纹样表达 对生活美好的祈求和未来美好的祈愿 | 尊贵、圆满、 吉祥、灵动、 坚贞 |
检测方法 | 尊贵 | 圆满 | 吉祥 | 灵动 | 坚贞 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
克伦巴赫系数 | 0.767 | 0.742 | 0.695 | 0.640 | 0.686 |
重测信度系数 | 0.829 | 0.798 | 0.712 | 0.724 | 0.767 |
Table 2 Reliability testing of semantic scales
检测方法 | 尊贵 | 圆满 | 吉祥 | 灵动 | 坚贞 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
克伦巴赫系数 | 0.767 | 0.742 | 0.695 | 0.640 | 0.686 |
重测信度系数 | 0.829 | 0.798 | 0.712 | 0.724 | 0.767 |
KMO取样适当性度量 | Bartlett球形检验 | ||
---|---|---|---|
近似卡方分布 | 自由度 | 显著性 | |
0.888 | 215.511 | 10 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Validity testing of semantic scales
KMO取样适当性度量 | Bartlett球形检验 | ||
---|---|---|---|
近似卡方分布 | 自由度 | 显著性 | |
0.888 | 215.511 | 10 | 0.000 |
语义词汇 | 分数 | $\overline{{{V}_{x}}}$ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5分 | 4分 | 3分 | 2分 | 1分 | ||
尊贵 | 13 | 18 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 0.232 |
圆满 | 22 | 18 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 0.249 |
吉祥 | 11 | 24 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 0.242 |
灵动 | 22 | 18 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.252 |
坚贞 | 7 | 28 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 0.226 |
Table 4 Semantic lexical relevance score
语义词汇 | 分数 | $\overline{{{V}_{x}}}$ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5分 | 4分 | 3分 | 2分 | 1分 | ||
尊贵 | 13 | 18 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 0.232 |
圆满 | 22 | 18 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 0.249 |
吉祥 | 11 | 24 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 0.242 |
灵动 | 22 | 18 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.252 |
坚贞 | 7 | 28 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 0.226 |
语义词汇 | 人员 | $\overline{{{V}_{y}}}$ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β1 | β2 | β3 | β4 | β5 | ||
尊贵 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2.60 |
圆满 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2.80 |
吉祥 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2.40 |
灵动 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2.20 |
坚贞 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2.80 |
Table 5 Semantic vocabulary design application value score
语义词汇 | 人员 | $\overline{{{V}_{y}}}$ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β1 | β2 | β3 | β4 | β5 | ||
尊贵 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2.60 |
圆满 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2.80 |
吉祥 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2.40 |
灵动 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2.20 |
坚贞 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2.80 |
可拓区间 | 尊贵 | 圆满 | 吉祥 | 灵动 | 坚贞 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
$\overline{{{V}_{x}}}$ | 0.232 | 0.249 | 0.242 | 0.252 | 0.226 |
$\overline{{{V}_{y}}}$ | 2.600 | 2.800 | 2.400 | 2.200 | 2.800 |
V | 0.603 | 0.697 | 0.581 | 0.554 | 0.633 |
Table 6 Semantic vocabulary extension interval
可拓区间 | 尊贵 | 圆满 | 吉祥 | 灵动 | 坚贞 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
$\overline{{{V}_{x}}}$ | 0.232 | 0.249 | 0.242 | 0.252 | 0.226 |
$\overline{{{V}_{y}}}$ | 2.600 | 2.800 | 2.400 | 2.200 | 2.800 |
V | 0.603 | 0.697 | 0.581 | 0.554 | 0.633 |
语义 词汇 | 图解编号 | ||
---|---|---|---|
B1 | B2 | B3 | |
尊贵 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
圆满 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
吉祥 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
灵动 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
坚贞 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Table 7 Semantic Vocabulary
语义 词汇 | 图解编号 | ||
---|---|---|---|
B1 | B2 | B3 | |
尊贵 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
圆满 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
吉祥 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
灵动 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
坚贞 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
设计师 成员 | 编号 | 尊贵 | 圆满 | 吉祥 | 灵动 | 坚贞 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | B1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
B2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
B3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |
D2 | B1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
B2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |
B3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | |
D3 | B1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
B2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
B3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Table 8 Semantic word recognition table
设计师 成员 | 编号 | 尊贵 | 圆满 | 吉祥 | 灵动 | 坚贞 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | B1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
B2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
B3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |
D2 | B1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
B2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |
B3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | |
D3 | B1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
B2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
B3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
设计师 成员 | 编号 | 尊贵 | 圆满 | 吉祥 | 灵动 | 坚贞 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | B1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
B2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
B3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
D2 | B1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
B2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |
B3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | |
D3 | B1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
B2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
B3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
Table 9 Semantic vocabulary design application value table
设计师 成员 | 编号 | 尊贵 | 圆满 | 吉祥 | 灵动 | 坚贞 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | B1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
B2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
B3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
D2 | B1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
B2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |
B3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | |
D3 | B1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
B2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
B3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
图解编号 | 平均值 | 尊贵 | 圆满 | 吉祥 | 灵动 | 坚贞 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | $\overline{{{V}_{Bx}}}$ | 3.33 | 2.67 | 3.00 | 2.67 | 3.33 |
$\overline{{{V}_{By}}}$ | 3.33 | 2.67 | 2.33 | 3.33 | 3.67 | |
B2 | $\overline{{{V}_{Bx}}}$ | 3.00 | 3.67 | 2.67 | 1.67 | 1.33 |
$\overline{{{V}_{By}}}$ | 3.67 | 3.67 | 2.67 | 2.33 | 3.00 | |
B3 | $\overline{{{V}_{Bx}}}$ | 3.00 | 2.67 | 3.33 | 2.33 | 2.67 |
$\overline{{{V}_{By}}}$ | 3.67 | 3.33 | 2.67 | 3.67 | 3.33 |
Table 10 Mean table of recognition degree and application value of semantic vocabulary
图解编号 | 平均值 | 尊贵 | 圆满 | 吉祥 | 灵动 | 坚贞 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | $\overline{{{V}_{Bx}}}$ | 3.33 | 2.67 | 3.00 | 2.67 | 3.33 |
$\overline{{{V}_{By}}}$ | 3.33 | 2.67 | 2.33 | 3.33 | 3.67 | |
B2 | $\overline{{{V}_{Bx}}}$ | 3.00 | 3.67 | 2.67 | 1.67 | 1.33 |
$\overline{{{V}_{By}}}$ | 3.67 | 3.67 | 2.67 | 2.33 | 3.00 | |
B3 | $\overline{{{V}_{Bx}}}$ | 3.00 | 2.67 | 3.33 | 2.33 | 2.67 |
$\overline{{{V}_{By}}}$ | 3.67 | 3.33 | 2.67 | 3.67 | 3.33 |
可拓区间 | 尊贵 | 圆满 | 吉祥 | 灵动 | 坚贞 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | 11.10 | 7.11 | 7.00 | 8.89 | 12.20 |
B2 | 11.00 | 13.40 | 7.11 | 3.89 | 4.00 |
B3 | 11.00 | 8.89 | 8.89 | 8.56 | 8.89 |
Table 11 Graphical extension interval table
可拓区间 | 尊贵 | 圆满 | 吉祥 | 灵动 | 坚贞 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | 11.10 | 7.11 | 7.00 | 8.89 | 12.20 |
B2 | 11.00 | 13.40 | 7.11 | 3.89 | 4.00 |
B3 | 11.00 | 8.89 | 8.89 | 8.56 | 8.89 |
设计方案编号 | $\overline{{{E}_{x}}}$ | $\overline{{{E}_{y}}}$ | E |
---|---|---|---|
E1 | 4.13 | 4.25 | 4.19 |
E2 | 3.81 | 3.72 | 3.77 |
E3 | 3.70 | 3.64 | 3.67 |
Table 12 Design optimization evaluation table
设计方案编号 | $\overline{{{E}_{x}}}$ | $\overline{{{E}_{y}}}$ | E |
---|---|---|---|
E1 | 4.13 | 4.25 | 4.19 |
E2 | 3.81 | 3.72 | 3.77 |
E3 | 3.70 | 3.64 | 3.67 |
输出图像编号 | PSNR |
---|---|
27.1 | |
26.3 | |
26.6 | |
27.0 | |
27.7 |
Table 13 The PSNR value of the output image
输出图像编号 | PSNR |
---|---|
27.1 | |
26.3 | |
26.6 | |
27.0 | |
27.7 |
输出图像编号 | $\overline{{{S}_{x}}}$ | $\overline{{{S}_{y}}}$ | $\overline{{{S}_{z}}}$ | S |
---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | 3.87 | 4.00 | 3.99 | 3.95 |
(b) | 3.69 | 3.98 | 4.06 | 3.91 |
(c) | 3.90 | 4.01 | 3.95 | 3.95 |
(d) | 3.89 | 4.09 | 3.89 | 3.96 |
(e) | 3.93 | 4.02 | 4.02 | 3.99 |
Table 14 Output image goodness evaluation table
输出图像编号 | $\overline{{{S}_{x}}}$ | $\overline{{{S}_{y}}}$ | $\overline{{{S}_{z}}}$ | S |
---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | 3.87 | 4.00 | 3.99 | 3.95 |
(b) | 3.69 | 3.98 | 4.06 | 3.91 |
(c) | 3.90 | 4.01 | 3.95 | 3.95 |
(d) | 3.89 | 4.09 | 3.89 | 3.96 |
(e) | 3.93 | 4.02 | 4.02 | 3.99 |
[1] | 梅东冬. “非遗”视角下陕西澄城西秀艺术研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学. |
MEI D D. Research on the art of Xixiu in Chengcheng, Shaanxi Province from the perspective of intangible heritage[D]. Xi'an: Shaanxi Normal University. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 杨孟云, 刘冬云. 陕西澄城民间刺绣中挂件的艺术文化研究及发展[J]. 服装学报, 2019, 4(6): 542-546. |
YANG M Y, LIU D Y. Artistic culture research and development of pendants in folk embroidery in Chengcheng, Shaanxi[J]. Journal of Clothing Research, 2019, 4(6): 542-546. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 赵妍, 张敏言, 任艳博. 澄城刺绣纹样提取与设计应用[J]. 设计, 2023, 36(3): 66-69. |
ZHAO Y, ZHANG M Y, REN Y B. Chengcheng embroidery pattern extraction and design application[J]. Design, 2023, 36(3): 66-69. (in Chinese) | |
[4] |
CAI W. Extension theory and its application[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1999, 44: 1538-1548.
DOI URL |
[5] | 李幼平. 可拓学: 沟通自然科学与社会科学的桥梁[J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(36): 1. |
LI Y P. Extenics: a bridge between natural science and social science[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2014, 32(36): 1. (in Chinese) | |
[6] |
吕健, 谢庆生, 黄海松, 等. 基于图解特征语义认知的产品设计过程知识模型[J]. 图学学报, 2015, 36(5): 703-711.
DOI |
LV J, XIE Q S, HUANG H S, et al. A method of product appearance design based on graphical semantic cognition[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2015, 36(5): 703-711. (in Chinese) | |
[7] |
段金娟, 张峰, 周鑫. 基于非遗和可拓语义的服务产品设计[J]. 图学学报, 2019, 40(4): 783-789.
DOI |
DUAN J J, ZHANG F, ZHOU X. Service product design based on intangible cultural heritage and extension semantics[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2019, 40(4): 783-789. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 秦臻, 季铁, 刘芳, 等. 基于民族图案基元可拓语义的产品设计方法[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2021, 33(10): 1595-1603. |
QIN Z, JI T, LIU F, et al. The method of product design based on extension semantics of national pattern primitives[J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2021, 33(10): 1595-1603. (in Chinese) | |
[9] |
李伟丽, 向泽锐, 李然, 等. 融合可拓语义和模糊综合评价的地铁列车外观设计方法[J]. 图学学报, 2020, 41(5): 814-823.
DOI |
LI W L, XIANG Z R, LI R, et al. Study on the approach to exterior design for metro trains based on extension semantics and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2020, 41(5): 814-823. (in Chinese) | |
[10] |
GATYS L, ECKER A, BETHGE M. A neural algorithm of artistic style[J]. Journal of Vision, 2016, 16(12): 326.
DOI URL |
[11] | LI J Y, WANG N Y, LIU J Y, et al. Demystifying neural style transfer[C]// The 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2017: 2230-2236. |
[12] | LI Y J, LIU M Y, LI X T, et al. A closed-form solution to photorealistic image stylization[M]// Computer Vision - ECCV 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018: 468-483. |
[13] | 林晓, 屈时操, 黄伟, 等. 显著区域保留的图像风格迁移算法[J]. 图学学报, 2021, 42(2): 190-197. |
LIN X, QU S C, HUANG W, et al. Style transfer algorithm for salient region preservation[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2021, 42(2): 190-197. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 郑锐, 钱文华, 徐丹, 等. 基于卷积神经网络的刺绣风格数字合成[J]. 浙江大学学报: 理学版, 2019, 46(3): 270-278. |
ZHENG R, QIAN W H, XU D, et al. Synthesis of embroidery based on convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science Edition, 2019, 46(3): 270-278. (in Chinese) | |
[15] |
侯宇康, 吕健, 刘翔, 等. 基于神经风格迁移网络的民族图案创新方法[J]. 图学学报, 2020, 41(4): 606-613.
DOI |
HOU Y K, LV J, LIU X, et al. Innovative method of ethnic pattern based on neural style transfer network[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2020, 41(4): 606-613. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | 邱雪琳, 孙迎, 刘正, 等. 基于色彩优化的云锦局部风格迁移[J]. 丝绸, 2022, 59(12): 64-70. |
QIU X L, SUN Y, LIU Z, et al. Local style transfer of Nanjing brocade based on color optimization[J]. Silk, 2022, 59(12): 64-70. (in Chinese) |
[1] | LI Xin, PU Yuan-yuan, ZHAO Zheng-peng, XU Dan, QIAN Wen-hua. Content semantics and style features match consistent artistic style transfer [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2023, 44(4): 699-709. |
[2] | LIN Xiao, QU Shi-cao, HUANG Wei, ZHENG Xiao-mei, MA Li-zhuang. Style transfer algorithm for salient region preservation [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2021, 42(2): 190-197. |
[3] | LI Wei-li1,XIANG Ze-rui1,2, LI Ran1,2, GOU Rui1,DENG Ming-xi1. Study on the approach to exterior design for metro trains based on extension semantics and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2020, 41(5): 814-823. |
[4] | HOU Yu-kang, LV Jian, LIU Xiang, HU Tao, ZHAO Ze-yu. Innovative method of ethnic pattern based on neural style transfer network [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2020, 41(4): 606-613. |
[5] | SHI Min1, WEI Yu-kun1, WANG Jun-zheng1, MAO Tian-lu2 . Transfer Method of Body Shape-Oriented Garment Style [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2019, 40(5): 866-871. |
[6] | WANG Nianwen1, QU Ruidan2 . Research on Shape Design Method of Ceramic Tea Set Based on User Intention [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2018, 39(6): 1175-1182. |
[7] | SU Jianning, ZHAO Xinxin, JING Nan, CHEN Yanhao. Research on Product Imagery Design by Simulating Design Thinking [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2018, 39(3): 547-552. |
[8] | Zhou Xiaojun, Yang Qin. Two Stepped Innovation Design Method of Products Based on the QFD [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2016, 37(3): 394-399. |
[9] | Liu Lingling, Xue Chengqi, Li Jing, Lin Li. Research on the Innovative Design Method and Characterization for Industrial Design Based on Basic Element Model [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2013, 34(3): 90-94. |
[10] | LIU Ji-yu, LIU Gang, WANG Ze-dong. Research on Design Method for Twinbridge Steering Arm Mechanism [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2010, 31(2): 182-187. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||