Journal of Graphics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 553-563.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026030553
• Image Processing and Computer Vision • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Wenhuan1,2,3(
), WANG Wenshu1, WANG Shuao1
Received:2025-07-04
Accepted:2026-02-02
Online:2026-06-30
Published:2026-06-30
Contact:
WU Wenhuan
Supported by:CLC Number:
WU Wenhuan, WANG Wenshu, WANG Shuao. Monocular depth estimation method with hierarchical dual-stream attention[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(3): 553-563.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.txxb.com.cn/EN/10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026030553
| Method | SqRel↓ | AbsRel↓ | RMSE↓ | δ<1.25↑ | δ<1.25²↑ | δ<1.25³↑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigen[ | 1.548 | 0.203 | 6.307 | 0.769 | 0.950 | 0.988 |
| DORN[ | 0.307 | 0.072 | 2.727 | 0.932 | 0.984 | 0.994 |
| BTS[ | 0.245 | 0.059 | 2.756 | 0.956 | 0.993 | 0.998 |
| Adabins[ | 0.190 | 0.058 | 2.360 | 0.964 | 0.995 | 0.999 |
| TransDepth[ | 0.252 | 0.064 | 2.755 | 0.956 | 0.994 | 0.998 |
| NENet[ | 0.213 | 0.059 | 2.543 | 0.961 | 0.995 | 0.999 |
| TEDepth[ | 0.174 | 0.056 | 2.223 | 0.968 | 0.996 | 0.999 |
| P3Depth[ | 0.270 | 0.071 | 2.842 | 0.953 | 0.993 | 0.998 |
| NeWCRFs[ | 0.155 | 0.052 | 2.129 | 0.974 | 0.997 | 0.999 |
| MonoFormer[ | 0.846 | 0.104 | 4.580 | 0.891 | 0.962 | 0.982 |
| SwinDepth[ | 0.739 | 0.106 | 4.510 | 0.890 | 0.964 | 0.984 |
| DepthFormer[ | 0.158 | 0.052 | 2.143 | 0.975 | 0.997 | 0.999 |
| DNA-Depth[ | 0.682 | 0.097 | 4.357 | 0.902 | 0.968 | 0.984 |
| Ours | 0.147 | 0.048 | 2.094 | 0.980 | 0.997 | 0.999 |
Table 1 Comparison of quantitative results of different methods on KITTI dataset
| Method | SqRel↓ | AbsRel↓ | RMSE↓ | δ<1.25↑ | δ<1.25²↑ | δ<1.25³↑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigen[ | 1.548 | 0.203 | 6.307 | 0.769 | 0.950 | 0.988 |
| DORN[ | 0.307 | 0.072 | 2.727 | 0.932 | 0.984 | 0.994 |
| BTS[ | 0.245 | 0.059 | 2.756 | 0.956 | 0.993 | 0.998 |
| Adabins[ | 0.190 | 0.058 | 2.360 | 0.964 | 0.995 | 0.999 |
| TransDepth[ | 0.252 | 0.064 | 2.755 | 0.956 | 0.994 | 0.998 |
| NENet[ | 0.213 | 0.059 | 2.543 | 0.961 | 0.995 | 0.999 |
| TEDepth[ | 0.174 | 0.056 | 2.223 | 0.968 | 0.996 | 0.999 |
| P3Depth[ | 0.270 | 0.071 | 2.842 | 0.953 | 0.993 | 0.998 |
| NeWCRFs[ | 0.155 | 0.052 | 2.129 | 0.974 | 0.997 | 0.999 |
| MonoFormer[ | 0.846 | 0.104 | 4.580 | 0.891 | 0.962 | 0.982 |
| SwinDepth[ | 0.739 | 0.106 | 4.510 | 0.890 | 0.964 | 0.984 |
| DepthFormer[ | 0.158 | 0.052 | 2.143 | 0.975 | 0.997 | 0.999 |
| DNA-Depth[ | 0.682 | 0.097 | 4.357 | 0.902 | 0.968 | 0.984 |
| Ours | 0.147 | 0.048 | 2.094 | 0.980 | 0.997 | 0.999 |
| Method | AbsRel↓ | RMSE↓ | log10↓ | δ<1.25↑ | δ<1.25²↑ | δ<1.25³↑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigen[ | 0.158 | 0.641 | - | 0.769 | 0.950 | 0.988 |
| DORN[ | 0.115 | 0.509 | 0.051 | 0.828 | 0.965 | 0.992 |
| BTS[ | 0.110 | 0.392 | 0.047 | 0.885 | 0.978 | 0.994 |
| TransDepth[ | 0.106 | 0.365 | 0.045 | 0.900 | 0.983 | 0.996 |
| Adabins[ | 0.103 | 0.364 | 0.044 | 0.903 | 0.984 | 0.997 |
| DAV[ | 0.108 | 0.412 | - | 0.882 | 0.980 | 0.996 |
| VNL[ | 0.108 | 0.416 | 0.048 | 0.875 | 0.976 | 0.994 |
| TEDepth[ | 0.100 | 0.349 | 0.043 | 0.907 | 0.987 | 0.998 |
| P3Depth[ | 0.104 | 0.356 | 0.043 | 0.898 | 0.981 | 0.996 |
| NENet[ | 0.100 | 0.349 | 0.043 | 0.907 | 0.987 | 0.998 |
| NeWCRFs[ | 0.095 | 0.334 | 0.041 | 0.922 | 0.992 | 0.998 |
| DepthFormer[ | 0.096 | 0.339 | 0.041 | 0.921 | 0.989 | 0.998 |
| PixelFormer[ | 0.090 | 0.322 | 0.039 | 0.929 | 0.991 | 0.998 |
| GDM-Depth[ | 0.113 | 0.439 | 0.049 | 0.872 | 0.972 | 0.993 |
| Ours | 0.087 | 0.316 | 0.037 | 0.935 | 0.992 | 0.998 |
Table 2 Comparison of quantitative results of different methods on NYU Depth V2 dataset
| Method | AbsRel↓ | RMSE↓ | log10↓ | δ<1.25↑ | δ<1.25²↑ | δ<1.25³↑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigen[ | 0.158 | 0.641 | - | 0.769 | 0.950 | 0.988 |
| DORN[ | 0.115 | 0.509 | 0.051 | 0.828 | 0.965 | 0.992 |
| BTS[ | 0.110 | 0.392 | 0.047 | 0.885 | 0.978 | 0.994 |
| TransDepth[ | 0.106 | 0.365 | 0.045 | 0.900 | 0.983 | 0.996 |
| Adabins[ | 0.103 | 0.364 | 0.044 | 0.903 | 0.984 | 0.997 |
| DAV[ | 0.108 | 0.412 | - | 0.882 | 0.980 | 0.996 |
| VNL[ | 0.108 | 0.416 | 0.048 | 0.875 | 0.976 | 0.994 |
| TEDepth[ | 0.100 | 0.349 | 0.043 | 0.907 | 0.987 | 0.998 |
| P3Depth[ | 0.104 | 0.356 | 0.043 | 0.898 | 0.981 | 0.996 |
| NENet[ | 0.100 | 0.349 | 0.043 | 0.907 | 0.987 | 0.998 |
| NeWCRFs[ | 0.095 | 0.334 | 0.041 | 0.922 | 0.992 | 0.998 |
| DepthFormer[ | 0.096 | 0.339 | 0.041 | 0.921 | 0.989 | 0.998 |
| PixelFormer[ | 0.090 | 0.322 | 0.039 | 0.929 | 0.991 | 0.998 |
| GDM-Depth[ | 0.113 | 0.439 | 0.049 | 0.872 | 0.972 | 0.993 |
| Ours | 0.087 | 0.316 | 0.037 | 0.935 | 0.992 | 0.998 |
Fig. 4 Comparison of visualization results of different methods on the indoor data set NYU Depth V2 ((a) Input pictures; (b) Real scene depth; (c) NeWCRFs; (d) GDM-Depth; (e) Ours)
| Dataset | Method | Abs Rel ↓ | RMSE ↓ | Sq Rel ↓ | δ<1.25↑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KITTI | B | 0.060 | 2.430 | 0.180 | 0.960 |
| B+E | 0.056 | 2.239 | 0.163 | 0.967 | |
| B+C | 0.054 | 2.225 | 0.161 | 0.971 | |
| B+ E+C | 0.056 | 2.205 | 0.158 | 0.970 | |
| B+E+C+F | 0.050 | 2.160 | 0.152 | 0.974 | |
| B+ E+C+F+M (Ours) | 0.048 | 2.094 | 0.147 | 0.980 | |
| NYU | B | 0.103 | 0.342 | 0.054 | 0.910 |
| B+E | 0.098 | 0.333 | 0.050 | 0.917 | |
| B+C | 0.095 | 0.334 | 0.047 | 0.922 | |
| B+ E+C | 0.094 | 0.331 | 0.047 | 0.923 | |
| B+E+C+F | 0.091 | 0.325 | 0.044 | 0.929 | |
| B+ E+C+F+M (Ours) | 0.087 | 0.316 | 0.040 | 0.934 |
Table 3 Ablation experimental results of different modules on the KITTI and NYU Depth V2 dataset
| Dataset | Method | Abs Rel ↓ | RMSE ↓ | Sq Rel ↓ | δ<1.25↑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KITTI | B | 0.060 | 2.430 | 0.180 | 0.960 |
| B+E | 0.056 | 2.239 | 0.163 | 0.967 | |
| B+C | 0.054 | 2.225 | 0.161 | 0.971 | |
| B+ E+C | 0.056 | 2.205 | 0.158 | 0.970 | |
| B+E+C+F | 0.050 | 2.160 | 0.152 | 0.974 | |
| B+ E+C+F+M (Ours) | 0.048 | 2.094 | 0.147 | 0.980 | |
| NYU | B | 0.103 | 0.342 | 0.054 | 0.910 |
| B+E | 0.098 | 0.333 | 0.050 | 0.917 | |
| B+C | 0.095 | 0.334 | 0.047 | 0.922 | |
| B+ E+C | 0.094 | 0.331 | 0.047 | 0.923 | |
| B+E+C+F | 0.091 | 0.325 | 0.044 | 0.929 | |
| B+ E+C+F+M (Ours) | 0.087 | 0.316 | 0.040 | 0.934 |
| 方法 | Params/M | FLOPs/G | GPU Memory (Allocated/GB) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NeWCRFs[ | 270.33 | 395.56 | 1.02 |
| Pixelformer[ | 258.25 | 385.07 | 1.02 |
| 本文方法 | 229.70 | 349.22 | 0.87 |
Table 4 Comparison of model complexity and GPU memory usage under a unified Swin-L backbone
| 方法 | Params/M | FLOPs/G | GPU Memory (Allocated/GB) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NeWCRFs[ | 270.33 | 395.56 | 1.02 |
| Pixelformer[ | 258.25 | 385.07 | 1.02 |
| 本文方法 | 229.70 | 349.22 | 0.87 |
| [1] | LEE Y, JEON J, KO Y, et al. Task-driven deep image enhancement network for autonomous driving in bad weather[C]//2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. New York: IEEE Press, 2021: 13746-13753. |
| [2] |
CHO J, RAHIMPOUR S, CUTLER A, et al. Enhancing reality: a systematic review of augmented reality in neuronavigation and education[J]. World Neurosurgery, 2020, 139: 186-195.
DOI PMID |
| [3] | BROOKS S P. Markov chain Monte Carlo method and its application[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician), 1998, 47(1): 69-100. |
| [4] | EIGEN D, PUHRSCH C, FERGUS R. Depth map prediction from a single image using a multi-scale deep network[C]//The 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014: 2366-2374. |
| [5] | LAINA I, RUPPRECHT C, BELAGIANNIS V, et al. Deeper depth prediction with fully convolutional residual networks[C]//2016 Fourth international conference on 3D vision. New York: IEEE Press, 2016: 239-248. |
| [6] |
ARAMPATZAKIS V, PAVLIDIS G, MITIANOUDIS N, et al. Monocular depth estimation: a thorough review[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024, 46(4): 2396-2414.
DOI URL |
| [7] | RANFTL R, BOCHKOVSKIY A, KOLTUN V. Vision transformers for dense prediction[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. New York: IEEE Press, 2021: 12159-12168. |
| [8] | DOSOVITSKIY A, BEYER L, KOLESNIKOV A, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words:transformers for image recognition at scale[EB/OL]. (2020-10-22) [2025-01-29]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.11929.pdf. |
| [9] |
LI Z Y, CHEN Z H, LIU X M, et al. Depthformer: exploiting long-range correlation and local information for accurate monocular depth estimation[J]. Machine Intelligence Research, 2023, 20(6): 837-854.
DOI |
| [10] |
RANFTL R, LASINGER K, HAFNER D, et al. Towards robust monocular depth estimation: mixing datasets for zero-shot cross-dataset transfer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2022, 44(3): 1623-1637.
DOI URL |
| [11] | BHAT S F, ALHASHIM I, WONKA P. AdaBins: depth estimation using adaptive bins[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE Press, 2021: 4008-4017. |
| [12] | AGARWAL A, ARORA C. Attention attention everywhere: monocular depth prediction with skip attention[C]//2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. New York: IEEE Press, 2023: 5850-5859. |
| [13] | YANG L H, KANG B Y, HUANG Z L, et al. Depth anything: unleashing the power of large-scale unlabeled data[C]//2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE Press, 2024: 10371-10381. |
| [14] | YANG L H, KANG B Y, HUANG Z L, et al. Depth anything V2[C]//The 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc., 2024: 688. |
| [15] | CHEN S L, GUO H K, ZHU S N, et al. Video depth anything: consistent depth estimation for super-long videos[C]//2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE Press, 2025: 22831-22840. |
| [16] | ZHANG N, NEX F, VOSSELMAN G, et al. Lite-mono: a lightweight CNN and transformer architecture for self-supervised monocular depth estimation[C]//2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE Press, 2023: 18537-18546. |
| [17] | LIU Z, LIN Y T, CAO Y, et al. Swin transformer: hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. New York: IEEE Press, 2021: 9992-10002. |
| [18] | OUYANG D L, HE S, ZHANG G Z, et al. Efficient multi-scale attention module with cross-spatial learning[C]//IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. New York: IEEE Press, 2023: 1-5. |
| [19] | DONG X Y, BAO J N, CHEN D D, et al. CSWin transformer: a general vision transformer backbone with cross-shaped windows[C]//2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE Press, 2022: 12114-12124. |
| [20] | EIGEN D, FERGUS R. Predicting depth, surface normals and semantic labels with a common multi-scale convolutional architecture[C]//2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. New York: IEEE Press, 2015: 2650-2658. |
| [21] |
GEIGER A, LENZ P, STILLER C, et al. Vision meets robotics: the kitti dataset[J]. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2013, 32(11): 1231-1237.
DOI URL |
| [22] | SILBERMAN N, HOIEM D, KOHLI P, et al. Indoor segmentation and support inference from rgbd images[C]//The 12th European Conference on Computer Vision. Cham: Springer, 2012: 746-760. |
| [23] | PASZKE A, GROSS S, MASSA F, et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library[EB/OL]. (2019-12-03) [2025-01-29]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.01703.pdf. |
| [24] | KINGMA D P, BA J L. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization[EB/OL]. (2014-12-22) [2025-01-29]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.6980.pdf. |
| [25] | FU H, GONG M M, WANG C H, et al. Deep ordinal regression network for monocular depth estimation[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE Press, 2018: 2002-2011. |
| [26] | LEE J H, HAN M K, KO D W, et al. From big to small: multi-scale local planar guidance for monocular depth estimation[EB/OL]. (2019-07-25) [2025-01-29]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.10326.pdf. |
| [27] | YANG G L, TANG H, DING M L, et al. Transformer-based attention networks for continuous pixel-wise prediction[C]// 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. New York: IEEE Press, 2021: 16249-16259. |
| [28] | SHAO S W, LI R, PEI Z C, et al. NENet: monocular depth estimation via neural ensembles[EB/OL]. (2021-11-16) [2025-01-29]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.08313v1. |
| [29] |
SHAO S W, LI R, PEI Z C, et al. Towards comprehensive monocular depth estimation: multiple heads are better than one[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2023, 25: 7660-7671.
DOI URL |
| [30] | PATIL V, SAKARIDIS C, LINIGER A, et al. P3Depth: monocular depth estimation with a piecewise planarity prior[C]//2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE Press, 2022: 1600-1611. |
| [31] | YUAN W H, GU X D, DAI Z Z, et al. Neural window fully-connected crfs for monocular depth estimation[C]//2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE Press, 2022: 3906-3915. |
| [32] | BAE J, MOON S, IM S. Deep digging into the generalization of self-supervised monocular depth estimation[C]//The 37th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2023: 187-196. |
| [33] | SHIM D, KIM H J. SwinDepth: unsupervised depth estimation using monocular sequences via swin transformer and densely cascaded network[C]//2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. New York: IEEE Press, 2023: 4983-4990. |
| [34] | WANG B Y, WANG S, YE D, et al. Deep neighbor layer aggregation for lightweight self-supervised monocular depth estimation[C]//ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. New York: IEEE Press, 2024: 4405-4409. |
| [35] | HUYNH L, NGUYEN-HA P, MATAS J, et al. Guiding monocular depth estimation using depth-attention volume[C]// The 16th European Conference on Computer Vision. Cham: Springer, 2020: 581-597. |
| [36] | YIN W, LIU Y F, SHEN C H, et al. Enforcing geometric constraints of virtual normal for depth prediction[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. New York: IEEE Press, 2019: 5683-5692. |
| [37] |
LV C, HAN C G, LANG J, et al. GDM-depth: leveraging global dependency modelling for self-supervised indoor depth estimation[J]. Image and Vision Computing, 2024, 149: 105160.
DOI URL |
| [1] | LI Xiumei, ZHOU Zhengxin, SUN Junmei. A multi-task collaborative image forgery detection framework assisted by localization branch [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(3): 524-533. |
| [2] | LI Jingtao, FENG Jun, ZHAO Zhihong. Adapter fine-tuning SAM and low-frequency fusion for semantic segmentation of remote sensing images [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(3): 543-552. |
| [3] | WANG Kun, LI Yifan, TIAN Hongliang, ZHU Weiguang, HUANG Yaning. A multi-indicator fusion digital-twin evaluation method oriented to FMA-UE [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(3): 607-615. |
| [4] | LU Dehui, SONG Zhuo, HUANG Zhichao, TIAN Shiyu, LI Huimin, TIAN Mao, DENG Yichuan. Subjective visual perception prediction of green construction sites based on TrueSkill ranking and deep learning [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(3): 641-652. |
| [5] | FANG Youjiang, WANG Shihao, ZHANG Liang, DUAN Keran, LIU Yue, WEI Xiaopeng, YANG Xin. Cross-modal consistency detection via graph topological feature extraction [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(2): 286-295. |
| [6] | YAN Kang, ZENG Li, GU Xiaoqing. Cross-domain structured deep dictionary learning for image classification [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(2): 341-350. |
| [7] | PANG Min, LI Zhentang, ZHANG Yuan, CUI Xiaokang, XIONG Fengguang. 3D model reconstruction based on retrieval and deformation techniques [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(2): 368-379. |
| [8] | DONG Wenyi, YANG Weidong, TANG Binghui, WANG Qi, XIAO Hongyu. Review of deep learning based methods for detecting focal liver lesions [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(1): 1-16. |
| [9] | ZHAI Yongjie, WANG Zixuan, ZHANG Zhenqi, ZHOU Xunqi, WANG Qianming. A vehicle damage classification model incorporating dual attention and weighted dynamic convolution [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(1): 17-28. |
| [10] | PAN Yuxuan, JIN Rui, LIU Yu, ZHANG Lin. Generative model based unsupervised multi-view stereo network [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(1): 29-38. |
| [11] | JIU Mingyuan, WU Guowei, SONG Xuguang, LI Shupan, XU Mingliang. Image classification method based on uncertainty-driven smart reinforcement active learning [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(1): 47-56. |
| [12] | XIANG Mengli, HUANG Zhiyong, SHE Yali, DING Tuojun. An image matching method for large viewpoint variation scenarios [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(1): 90-98. |
| [13] | YANG Biao, WANG Xue, GUAN Zheng, LONG Ping. BSD-YOLO: a small target vehicle detection method based on dynamic sparse attention and adaptive detection head [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(1): 99-110. |
| [14] | JU Chen, DING Jiaxin, WANG Zexing, LI Guangzhao, GUAN Zhenxiang, ZHANG Changyou. Graph neural network-based method for approximating finite element shape functions [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2025, 46(6): 1161-1171. |
| [15] | YI Bin, ZHANG Libin, LIU Danying, TANG Jun, FANG Junjun, LI Wenqi. Prediction model of laser drilling ventilation rate in cigarette manufacturing process based on AMTA-Net [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2025, 46(6): 1224-1232. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||