Journal of Graphics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 854-862.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026040854
• Digital Design and Manufacture • Previous Articles Next Articles
WEI Wei1(
), CHEN Ping2, TANG Baitao1, LI Zhefu2
Received:2026-02-04
Accepted:2026-04-13
Online:2026-08-31
Published:2026-08-31
Contact:
WEI Wei
CLC Number:
WEI Wei, CHEN Ping, TANG Baitao, LI Zhefu. Multi-parameter threshold fusion fault prediction method for roll forming process[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(4): 854-862.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.txxb.com.cn/EN/10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026040854
| 阈值类型 | 取值 | 设置依据 |
|---|---|---|
| 速度三级区间 | 23.0/27.0,24.0/26.0 | 基于某型辊压成形设备生产 数据的统计均值与标准差 |
| 温度三级区间 | 70.0/80.0,72.0/78.0 | 同速度,结合材料塑性变形 的温度阈值要求 |
| 压力三级区间 | 4.5/5.6,4.7/5.3 | 同速度,结合产品尺寸精度 要求的压力波动范围 |
| 压力-速度比容忍 比例 | 4%/8.5% | 统计正常工况下压速比的波 动范围,故障工况下压速比 的偏离程度 |
Table 1 Model core threshold value and setting basis
| 阈值类型 | 取值 | 设置依据 |
|---|---|---|
| 速度三级区间 | 23.0/27.0,24.0/26.0 | 基于某型辊压成形设备生产 数据的统计均值与标准差 |
| 温度三级区间 | 70.0/80.0,72.0/78.0 | 同速度,结合材料塑性变形 的温度阈值要求 |
| 压力三级区间 | 4.5/5.6,4.7/5.3 | 同速度,结合产品尺寸精度 要求的压力波动范围 |
| 压力-速度比容忍 比例 | 4%/8.5% | 统计正常工况下压速比的波 动范围,故障工况下压速比 的偏离程度 |
| 场景类型 | 样本比例/% | 故障注入方式 |
|---|---|---|
| 正常 | 55 | 无故障,参数严格位于正常区间内,围绕中心值正态波动 |
| 警告-单参数 异常 | 20 | 单个参数进入警告区间(未达故障区间),其余参数正常 |
| 故障-单参数 异常 | 10 | 单个参数超出警告区间(故障区间),其余参数正常 |
| 故障-压速比 异常 | 4 | 所有单参数均严格位于正常区间内,仅压速比严重偏离基准值 |
| 故障-低温- 高压异常 | 4 | 单参数均位于正常区间内,仅触发低温-高压耦合 |
| 故障-低速- 高压异常 | 4 | 单参数均位于正常区间内,仅触发低速-高压耦合 |
| 故障-混合耦 合异常 | 3 | 压速比偏离+低温-高压耦合同时触发,单参数位于正常区间 |
Table 2 Simulation dataset scenario design and fault injection details
| 场景类型 | 样本比例/% | 故障注入方式 |
|---|---|---|
| 正常 | 55 | 无故障,参数严格位于正常区间内,围绕中心值正态波动 |
| 警告-单参数 异常 | 20 | 单个参数进入警告区间(未达故障区间),其余参数正常 |
| 故障-单参数 异常 | 10 | 单个参数超出警告区间(故障区间),其余参数正常 |
| 故障-压速比 异常 | 4 | 所有单参数均严格位于正常区间内,仅压速比严重偏离基准值 |
| 故障-低温- 高压异常 | 4 | 单参数均位于正常区间内,仅触发低温-高压耦合 |
| 故障-低速- 高压异常 | 4 | 单参数均位于正常区间内,仅触发低速-高压耦合 |
| 故障-混合耦 合异常 | 3 | 压速比偏离+低温-高压耦合同时触发,单参数位于正常区间 |
| 方法 | 精确率 | 宏平均F1分数 |
|---|---|---|
| 单参数固定阈值方法 | 0.821 7 | 0.741 7 |
| 不含耦合规则的多参数阈值模型 | 0.902 1 | 0.851 5 |
| 基于布尔逻辑的多参数耦合判定 模型 | 0.886 0 | 0.848 1 |
| 引入工艺耦合规则的完整模型 | 0.934 7 | 0.902 3 |
Table 3 Comparison of test results of four methods
| 方法 | 精确率 | 宏平均F1分数 |
|---|---|---|
| 单参数固定阈值方法 | 0.821 7 | 0.741 7 |
| 不含耦合规则的多参数阈值模型 | 0.902 1 | 0.851 5 |
| 基于布尔逻辑的多参数耦合判定 模型 | 0.886 0 | 0.848 1 |
| 引入工艺耦合规则的完整模型 | 0.934 7 | 0.902 3 |
| 工况 | 精确率 | 召回率 | F1分数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 0.836 | 1.000 | 0.911 |
| Warning | 0.680 | 0.683 | 0.681 |
| Critical | 1.000 | 0.463 | 0.633 |
Table 4 Test results of single-parameter fixed threshold method
| 工况 | 精确率 | 召回率 | F1分数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 0.836 | 1.000 | 0.911 |
| Warning | 0.680 | 0.683 | 0.681 |
| Critical | 1.000 | 0.463 | 0.633 |
| 工况 | 精确率 | 召回率 | F1分数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 0.952 | 0.994 | 0.973 |
| Warning | 0.787 | 0.684 | 0.732 |
| Critical | 0.851 | 0.849 | 0.850 |
Table 5 Test results of the multi-parameter threshold model without coupling rules
| 工况 | 精确率 | 召回率 | F1分数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 0.952 | 0.994 | 0.973 |
| Warning | 0.787 | 0.684 | 0.732 |
| Critical | 0.851 | 0.849 | 0.850 |
| 工况 | 精确率 | 召回率 | F1分数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 0.882 | 0.994 | 0.934 |
| Warning | 0.974 | 0.684 | 0.804 |
| Critical | 0.840 | 0.775 | 0.806 |
Table 6 Multi-parameter coupling decision model based on Boolean logic
| 工况 | 精确率 | 召回率 | F1分数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 0.882 | 0.994 | 0.934 |
| Warning | 0.974 | 0.684 | 0.804 |
| Critical | 0.840 | 0.775 | 0.806 |
| 工况 | 精确率 | 召回率 | F1分数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 0.952 | 0.994 | 0.973 |
| Warning | 0.974 | 0.684 | 0.804 |
| Critical | 0.870 | 1.000 | 0.931 |
Table 7 Full model test results with the introduction of process coupling rules
| 工况 | 精确率 | 召回率 | F1分数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 0.952 | 0.994 | 0.973 |
| Warning | 0.974 | 0.684 | 0.804 |
| Critical | 0.870 | 1.000 | 0.931 |
| [1] |
HU M, LI Y B, LI X, et al. The roll-forming process analysis of the situation and development trend[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2018, 764: 201-209.
DOI URL |
| [2] | 韩飞, 宁梓淮. 辊弯成形技术研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(11): 279-300. |
|
HAN F, NING Z H. Status of Research and Development Trend of Roll Forming Technology[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2025, 61(11): 279-300 (in Chinese).
DOI URL |
|
| [3] | 晏培杰. 定制辊压成型技术发展综述[J]. 现代交通与冶金材料, 2022, 2(4): 37-45. |
| YAN P J. Review of customized roll forming technology[J]. Modern Transportation and Metallurgical Materials, 2022, 2(4): 37-45 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] |
MOEN C D, IGUSA T, SCHAFER B W. Prediction of residual stresses and strains in cold-formed steel members[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2008, 46(11): 1274-1289.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
裴洪, 胡昌华, 司小胜, 等. 基于机器学习的设备剩余寿命预测方法综述[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(8): 1-13.
DOI |
|
PEI H, HU C H, SI X S, et al. Review of machine learning based remaining useful life prediction methods for equipment[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(8): 1-13 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [6] | WANG X, WANG T Y, MING A B, et al. Cross-operating condition degradation knowledge learning for remaining useful life estimation of bearings[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2021, 70: 3520911. |
| [7] | 陶飞, 刘蔚然, 张萌, 等. 数字孪生五维模型及十大领域应用[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(1): 1-18. |
| TAO F, LIU W R, ZHANG M, et al. Five-dimension digital twin model and its ten applications[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2019, 25(1): 1-18 (in Chinese). | |
| [8] |
TAO F, SUI F Y, LIU A, et al. Digital twin-driven product design framework[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2019, 57(12): 3935-3953.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
孙勇, 吴本钊, 张东星, 等. 辊冲复合成形研究现状[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2022, 29(11): 67-84.
DOI |
|
SUN Y, WU B Z, ZHANG D X, et al. Research state of roll stamping compound forming[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2022, 29(11): 67-84 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [10] |
PANTHI S K, RAMAKRISHNAN N, AHMED M, et al. Finite element analysis of sheet metal bending process to predict the springback[J]. Materials & Design, 2010, 31(2): 657-662.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
SAFDARIAN R, MOSLEMI NAEINI H. The effects of forming parameters on the cold roll forming of channel section[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2015, 92: 130-136.
DOI URL |
| [12] | 孙达, 苏春建, 张志国. 基于成形角度分配优化函数的辊弯成形边波及纵向弯曲缺陷研究[J]. 精密成形工程, 2022, 14(2): 110-116. |
| SUN D, SU C J, ZHANG Z G. Edge and longitudinal bending defects in roll bending forming based on forming angle allocation optimization function[J]. Journal of Netshape Forming Engineering, 2022, 14(2): 110-116 (in Chinese). | |
| [13] |
GAO Z W, CECATI C, DING S X. A survey of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant techniques-Part I: fault diagnosis with model-based and signal-based approaches[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2015, 62(6): 3757-3767.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
TIAN Y, LU C, WANG Z L. Approach for hydraulic pump fault diagnosis based on WPT-SVD and SVM[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2015, 764-765: 191-197.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
吴鹏兴, 郭宇, 黄少华, 等. 基于数字孪生的离散制造车间可视化实时监控方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(6): 1605-1616.
DOI |
| WU P X, GUO Y, HUANG S H, et al. Visual real-time monitoring method for discrete manufacturing workshop based on digital twin[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 27(6): 1605-1616 (in Chinese). |
| [1] | YANG Jihao, CHEN Penglu, LU Baihua, ZHAO Yu, ZHAO Chunjie, ZHANG Jian, ZHOU Yihui, CHEN Lei, CHEN Xiangsheng, TAN Yi. A visual delivery method for underground space digital models integrating 4D Gaussian splatting and augmented reality [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(4): 895-903. |
| [2] | WANG Kun, LI Yifan, TIAN Hongliang, ZHU Weiguang, HUANG Yaning. A multi-indicator fusion digital-twin evaluation method oriented to FMA-UE [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(3): 607-615. |
| [3] | LIANG Shenglong, FAN Qiuxia. Generative digital twin modeling based on large models [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(1): 173-178. |
| [4] | CHEN Ruiqi, LIU Xiaofei, WAN Feng, HOU Peng, SHEN Jinyi. Simulation and prediction method of satellite solar wing deployment test driven by digital twin [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2025, 46(2): 449-458. |
| [5] | XU Jinglin, PENG Yang, OU Jinwu, TAN Junjie, SHU Jiangpeng, YU Fangqiang. An intelligent maintenance system for public buildings integrating digital twin and large language model [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2024, 45(6): 1200-1206. |
| [6] | HUANG Wenkai, LIANG Zhihong, WANG Minghua, ZHANG Wenfeng, WANG Yishou. Application and prospect of digital twin in the design, manufacturing, and operation of aerospace structures [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2024, 45(2): 241-249. |
| [7] | PANG Bo, YANG Hui, YU Rongrong, ZHANG Haoyue, LUO Qiang. Research on spacecraft mechanisms production line balance based on digital twin technology [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2024, 45(2): 332-338. |
| [8] | TANG Peng, SA Guo-dong, LIU Zhen-yu, TAN Jian-rong. Design of digital twin system for forging hydraulic press [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2023, 44(3): 609-615. |
| [9] | TIAN Ling, LIU Guo, LIU Si-chao . Digital twin and production line simulation technology [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2021, 42(3): 349-358. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||