Journal of Graphics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 834-843.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026040834
• Digital Design and Manufacture • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2026-01-07
Accepted:2026-05-11
Online:2026-08-31
Published:2026-08-31
Contact:
LIU Ligang
Supported by:CLC Number:
YIN Siqi, LIU Ligang. Multi-goal path planning based on hierarchical probabilistic roadmaps[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(4): 834-843.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.txxb.com.cn/EN/10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026040834
| 算例 | Angle A*[ | SOM[ | IST*[ | FMF[ | SFF*[ | 本文算法 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | |
| 2D-Sparse-20 | 6.94 | 2.95 | 7.63 | 1.28 | 6.30 | 1.95 | 4.51 | 2.49 | 4.33 | 2.29 | 3.76 | 1.68 |
| 2D-Sparse-40 | 7.55 | 3.82 | 7.32 | 1.52 | 5.88 | 2.62 | 4.96 | 3.34 | 4.48 | 2.87 | 3.99 | 2.33 |
| 2D-Sparse-60 | 5.86 | 5.09 | 6.96 | 1.66 | 6.23 | 2.77 | 5.03 | 5.29 | 4.60 | 3.25 | 4.01 | 2.66 |
| 2D-Medium-20 | 7.53 | 4.02 | 7.80 | 1.63 | 5.92 | 2.35 | 4.86 | 3.55 | 4.47 | 2.97 | 3.66 | 2.62 |
| 2D-Medium-40 | 7.25 | 4.39 | 6.79 | 1.55 | 6.19 | 2.49 | 5.10 | 3.53 | 4.44 | 3.11 | 3.49 | 2.51 |
| 2D-Medium-60 | 6.77 | 3.42 | 7.35 | 1.69 | 5.52 | 2.56 | 5.11 | 3.21 | 4.40 | 2.78 | 3.97 | 2.49 |
| 2D-Dense-20 | 6.47 | 3.00 | 7.29 | 1.10 | 6.50 | 1.93 | 4.92 | 2.37 | 4.41 | 2.08 | 4.83 | 1.85 |
| 2D-Dense-40 | 6.07 | 4.14 | 7.00 | 1.21 | 6.38 | 2.20 | 4.59 | 4.38 | 4.07 | 3.08 | 3.94 | 2.89 |
| 2D-Dense-60 | 7.15 | 4.62 | 6.68 | 2.09 | 6.32 | 2.81 | 4.65 | 4.09 | 4.58 | 4.62 | 3.67 | 3.01 |
| 3D-Sparse-20 | 7.10 | 9.80 | 7.63 | 4.16 | 7.49 | 5.91 | 5.72 | 11.28 | 5.90 | 8.78 | 5.72 | 7.68 |
| 3D-Sparse-40 | 6.74 | 14.83 | 8.15 | 5.28 | 7.02 | 9.83 | 5.63 | 17.98 | 5.38 | 10.12 | 5.18 | 8.89 |
| 3D-Sparse-60 | 8.29 | 19.31 | 7.84 | 10.41 | 7.28 | 9.40 | 5.67 | 19.32 | 5.88 | 11.44 | 5.14 | 9.30 |
| 3D-Medium-20 | 8.08 | 13.77 | 8.54 | 4.29 | 7.23 | 7.40 | 6.02 | 11.42 | 5.38 | 8.88 | 5.25 | 8.77 |
| 3D-Medium-40 | 8.17 | 14.69 | 8.08 | 6.92 | 7.18 | 10.40 | 6.23 | 14.83 | 5.81 | 11.65 | 4.68 | 9.68 |
| 3D-Medium-60 | 8.01 | 19.62 | 8.69 | 9.82 | 6.90 | 11.50 | 5.84 | 20.63 | 5.46 | 15.80 | 4.73 | 11.11 |
| 3D-Dense-20 | 7.52 | 13.18 | 8.55 | 4.89 | 6.87 | 6.67 | 5.88 | 10.92 | 5.43 | 10.72 | 5.67 | 8.65 |
| 3D-Dense-40 | 7.46 | 18.33 | 8.34 | 7.17 | 7.10 | 8.86 | 6.26 | 13.97 | 5.27 | 10.07 | 4.94 | 9.84 |
| 3D-Dense-60 | 8.40 | 20.86 | 7.83 | 10.76 | 6.85 | 9.95 | 6.24 | 18.38 | 5.20 | 12.69 | 4.74 | 10.55 |
| 6D-Sparse-20 | 8.20 | 21.25 | 9.74 | 7.04 | 8.38 | 12.20 | 6.96 | 27.35 | 6.25 | 20.61 | 6.13 | 15.20 |
| 6D-Sparse-40 | 9.29 | 40.62 | 8.84 | 14.08 | 8.58 | 19.36 | 7.17 | 35.14 | 6.58 | 26.49 | 5.57 | 23.68 |
| 6D-Sparse-60 | 9.24 | 43.18 | 9.70 | 14.84 | 7.53 | 30.64 | 7.02 | 38.17 | 6.63 | 35.70 | 5.53 | 25.82 |
| 6D-Medium-20 | 9.37 | 20.47 | 8.79 | 7.48 | 8.09 | 11.62 | 6.73 | 25.56 | 6.56 | 18.09 | 5.89 | 14.44 |
| 6D-Medium-40 | 8.61 | 38.01 | 8.99 | 12.96 | 7.60 | 18.14 | 6.95 | 34.86 | 6.01 | 28.63 | 6.04 | 23.69 |
| 6D-Medium-60 | 8.90 | 43.71 | 8.61 | 16.22 | 8.38 | 30.68 | 6.66 | 40.81 | 6.67 | 32.44 | 5.72 | 27.68 |
| 6D-Dense-20 | 9.59 | 19.38 | 9.33 | 7.79 | 8.59 | 11.83 | 6.70 | 31.08 | 6.74 | 19.05 | 5.63 | 16.98 |
| 6D-Dense-40 | 8.48 | 35.69 | 8.73 | 13.08 | 7.57 | 16.38 | 6.96 | 34.22 | 6.62 | 25.11 | 5.74 | 22.18 |
| 6D-Dense-60 | 7.63 | 41.57 | 8.56 | 17.54 | 8.53 | 30.04 | 6.86 | 43.03 | 6.03 | 38.96 | 5.65 | 29.80 |
Table 1 Comparisons of our method and other mainstream methods in multiple scenarios
| 算例 | Angle A*[ | SOM[ | IST*[ | FMF[ | SFF*[ | 本文算法 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | Gap/% | 时间/s | |
| 2D-Sparse-20 | 6.94 | 2.95 | 7.63 | 1.28 | 6.30 | 1.95 | 4.51 | 2.49 | 4.33 | 2.29 | 3.76 | 1.68 |
| 2D-Sparse-40 | 7.55 | 3.82 | 7.32 | 1.52 | 5.88 | 2.62 | 4.96 | 3.34 | 4.48 | 2.87 | 3.99 | 2.33 |
| 2D-Sparse-60 | 5.86 | 5.09 | 6.96 | 1.66 | 6.23 | 2.77 | 5.03 | 5.29 | 4.60 | 3.25 | 4.01 | 2.66 |
| 2D-Medium-20 | 7.53 | 4.02 | 7.80 | 1.63 | 5.92 | 2.35 | 4.86 | 3.55 | 4.47 | 2.97 | 3.66 | 2.62 |
| 2D-Medium-40 | 7.25 | 4.39 | 6.79 | 1.55 | 6.19 | 2.49 | 5.10 | 3.53 | 4.44 | 3.11 | 3.49 | 2.51 |
| 2D-Medium-60 | 6.77 | 3.42 | 7.35 | 1.69 | 5.52 | 2.56 | 5.11 | 3.21 | 4.40 | 2.78 | 3.97 | 2.49 |
| 2D-Dense-20 | 6.47 | 3.00 | 7.29 | 1.10 | 6.50 | 1.93 | 4.92 | 2.37 | 4.41 | 2.08 | 4.83 | 1.85 |
| 2D-Dense-40 | 6.07 | 4.14 | 7.00 | 1.21 | 6.38 | 2.20 | 4.59 | 4.38 | 4.07 | 3.08 | 3.94 | 2.89 |
| 2D-Dense-60 | 7.15 | 4.62 | 6.68 | 2.09 | 6.32 | 2.81 | 4.65 | 4.09 | 4.58 | 4.62 | 3.67 | 3.01 |
| 3D-Sparse-20 | 7.10 | 9.80 | 7.63 | 4.16 | 7.49 | 5.91 | 5.72 | 11.28 | 5.90 | 8.78 | 5.72 | 7.68 |
| 3D-Sparse-40 | 6.74 | 14.83 | 8.15 | 5.28 | 7.02 | 9.83 | 5.63 | 17.98 | 5.38 | 10.12 | 5.18 | 8.89 |
| 3D-Sparse-60 | 8.29 | 19.31 | 7.84 | 10.41 | 7.28 | 9.40 | 5.67 | 19.32 | 5.88 | 11.44 | 5.14 | 9.30 |
| 3D-Medium-20 | 8.08 | 13.77 | 8.54 | 4.29 | 7.23 | 7.40 | 6.02 | 11.42 | 5.38 | 8.88 | 5.25 | 8.77 |
| 3D-Medium-40 | 8.17 | 14.69 | 8.08 | 6.92 | 7.18 | 10.40 | 6.23 | 14.83 | 5.81 | 11.65 | 4.68 | 9.68 |
| 3D-Medium-60 | 8.01 | 19.62 | 8.69 | 9.82 | 6.90 | 11.50 | 5.84 | 20.63 | 5.46 | 15.80 | 4.73 | 11.11 |
| 3D-Dense-20 | 7.52 | 13.18 | 8.55 | 4.89 | 6.87 | 6.67 | 5.88 | 10.92 | 5.43 | 10.72 | 5.67 | 8.65 |
| 3D-Dense-40 | 7.46 | 18.33 | 8.34 | 7.17 | 7.10 | 8.86 | 6.26 | 13.97 | 5.27 | 10.07 | 4.94 | 9.84 |
| 3D-Dense-60 | 8.40 | 20.86 | 7.83 | 10.76 | 6.85 | 9.95 | 6.24 | 18.38 | 5.20 | 12.69 | 4.74 | 10.55 |
| 6D-Sparse-20 | 8.20 | 21.25 | 9.74 | 7.04 | 8.38 | 12.20 | 6.96 | 27.35 | 6.25 | 20.61 | 6.13 | 15.20 |
| 6D-Sparse-40 | 9.29 | 40.62 | 8.84 | 14.08 | 8.58 | 19.36 | 7.17 | 35.14 | 6.58 | 26.49 | 5.57 | 23.68 |
| 6D-Sparse-60 | 9.24 | 43.18 | 9.70 | 14.84 | 7.53 | 30.64 | 7.02 | 38.17 | 6.63 | 35.70 | 5.53 | 25.82 |
| 6D-Medium-20 | 9.37 | 20.47 | 8.79 | 7.48 | 8.09 | 11.62 | 6.73 | 25.56 | 6.56 | 18.09 | 5.89 | 14.44 |
| 6D-Medium-40 | 8.61 | 38.01 | 8.99 | 12.96 | 7.60 | 18.14 | 6.95 | 34.86 | 6.01 | 28.63 | 6.04 | 23.69 |
| 6D-Medium-60 | 8.90 | 43.71 | 8.61 | 16.22 | 8.38 | 30.68 | 6.66 | 40.81 | 6.67 | 32.44 | 5.72 | 27.68 |
| 6D-Dense-20 | 9.59 | 19.38 | 9.33 | 7.79 | 8.59 | 11.83 | 6.70 | 31.08 | 6.74 | 19.05 | 5.63 | 16.98 |
| 6D-Dense-40 | 8.48 | 35.69 | 8.73 | 13.08 | 7.57 | 16.38 | 6.96 | 34.22 | 6.62 | 25.11 | 5.74 | 22.18 |
| 6D-Dense-60 | 7.63 | 41.57 | 8.56 | 17.54 | 8.53 | 30.04 | 6.86 | 43.03 | 6.03 | 38.96 | 5.65 | 29.80 |
| 问题规模 | 策略A | 策略B | 策略C | 策略D | 策略E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 0.72 | 0.49 | 0.87 |
| 20 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 0.45 | 1.05 |
| 30 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 1.07 | 1.13 | 1.53 |
| 40 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 1.08 | 1.83 | 2.10 |
| 50 | 0.08 | 1.20 | 1.23 | 2.39 | 3.06 |
| 60 | 0.01 | 0.70 | 0.91 | 2.55 | 2.90 |
| 70 | 0.01 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 2.57 | 2.95 |
| 80 | 0.02 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 3.19 | 3.69 |
Table 2 Comparisons of solution quality when goals are uniformly distributed/%
| 问题规模 | 策略A | 策略B | 策略C | 策略D | 策略E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 0.72 | 0.49 | 0.87 |
| 20 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 0.45 | 1.05 |
| 30 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 1.07 | 1.13 | 1.53 |
| 40 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 1.08 | 1.83 | 2.10 |
| 50 | 0.08 | 1.20 | 1.23 | 2.39 | 3.06 |
| 60 | 0.01 | 0.70 | 0.91 | 2.55 | 2.90 |
| 70 | 0.01 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 2.57 | 2.95 |
| 80 | 0.02 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 3.19 | 3.69 |
| 问题规模 | 策略A | 策略B | 策略C | 策略D | 策略E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 2.12 | 2.26 | 2.31 | 2.33 | 2.62 |
| 20 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 2.16 | 1.93 |
| 30 | 1.13 | 0.10 | 1.09 | 1.21 | 1.83 |
| 40 | 1.52 | 0.73 | 1.24 | 2.50 | 2.75 |
| 50 | 1.01 | 0.83 | 1.34 | 2.62 | 3.14 |
| 60 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 1.10 | 2.46 | 2.87 |
| 70 | 2.76 | 0.73 | 2.40 | 3.89 | 5.27 |
| 80 | 1.42 | 0.59 | 1.46 | 3.66 | 4.90 |
Table 3 Comparisons of solution quality when goals are relatively clustered/%
| 问题规模 | 策略A | 策略B | 策略C | 策略D | 策略E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 2.12 | 2.26 | 2.31 | 2.33 | 2.62 |
| 20 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 2.16 | 1.93 |
| 30 | 1.13 | 0.10 | 1.09 | 1.21 | 1.83 |
| 40 | 1.52 | 0.73 | 1.24 | 2.50 | 2.75 |
| 50 | 1.01 | 0.83 | 1.34 | 2.62 | 3.14 |
| 60 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 1.10 | 2.46 | 2.87 |
| 70 | 2.76 | 0.73 | 2.40 | 3.89 | 5.27 |
| 80 | 1.42 | 0.59 | 1.46 | 3.66 | 4.90 |
| 算例 | 初计算 | 重计算 | 初计算+重计算 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2D-Sparse-40 | 7.44 | 6.51 | 3.99 |
| 2D-Medium-40 | 7.75 | 5.18 | 3.69 |
| 2D-Dense-40 | 8.33 | 6.75 | 3.94 |
| 3D-Sparse-40 | 8.94 | 6.40 | 5.18 |
| 3D-Medium-40 | 7.84 | 5.94 | 4.68 |
| 3D-Dense-40 | 11.45 | 9.52 | 4.94 |
| 6D-Sparse-40 | 10.29 | 9.24 | 5.57 |
| 6D-Medium-40 | 8.77 | 6.69 | 6.04 |
| 6D-Dense-40 | 11.50 | 8.58 | 5.74 |
Table 4 Ablation study on initial planning and refinement planning (Gap/%)
| 算例 | 初计算 | 重计算 | 初计算+重计算 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2D-Sparse-40 | 7.44 | 6.51 | 3.99 |
| 2D-Medium-40 | 7.75 | 5.18 | 3.69 |
| 2D-Dense-40 | 8.33 | 6.75 | 3.94 |
| 3D-Sparse-40 | 8.94 | 6.40 | 5.18 |
| 3D-Medium-40 | 7.84 | 5.94 | 4.68 |
| 3D-Dense-40 | 11.45 | 9.52 | 4.94 |
| 6D-Sparse-40 | 10.29 | 9.24 | 5.57 |
| 6D-Medium-40 | 8.77 | 6.69 | 6.04 |
| 6D-Dense-40 | 11.50 | 8.58 | 5.74 |
| [1] |
AIT SAADI A, SOUKANE A, MERAIHI Y, et al. UAV path planning using optimization approaches: a survey[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2022, 29(6): 4233-4284.
DOI |
| [2] |
SÁNCHEZ-IBÁÑEZ J R, PÉREZ-DEL-PULGAR C J, GARCÍA-CEREZO A. Path planning for autonomous mobile robots: a review[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(23): 7898.
DOI URL |
| [3] | 刘清云, 游雄, 张欣, 等. 移动机器人路径规划算法综述[J]. 计算机科学, 2025, 52(S1): 147-156. |
| LIU Q Y, YOU X, ZHANG X, et al. Review of path planning algorithms for mobile robots[J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(S1): 147-156 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] |
贾明超, 冯斌, 吴鹏, 等. 一种融合改进A*算法与改进动态窗口法的文旅服务机器人路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2024, 45(3): 505-515.
DOI |
|
JIA M C, FENG B, WU P, et al. A path planning for cultural tourism service robot combining improved A* algorithm and improved dynamic window approach[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2024, 45(3): 505-515 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [5] | 马天, 杨秦, 李占利. 基于改进多粒子群的牙齿正畸路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2021, 42(4): 615-622. |
|
MA T, YANG Q, LI Z L. Orthodontic path planning based on improved multi-PSO[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2021, 42(4): 615-622 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [6] |
孙瑞, 张文胜. 基于改进蚁群算法的移动机器人平滑路径规划[J]. 图学学报, 2019, 40(2): 344-350.
DOI |
|
SUN R, ZHANG W S. Smooth path planning of mobile robot based on improved ant colony algorithm[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2019, 40(2): 344-350 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [7] |
SUI J, DING S Z, HUANG X L, et al. A survey on deep learning-based algorithms for the traveling salesman problem[J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2025, 19(6): 196322.
DOI |
| [8] |
POP P C, COSMA O, SABO C, et al. A comprehensive survey on the generalized traveling salesman problem[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2024, 314(3): 819-835.
DOI URL |
| [9] | SAHA M, SANCHEZ-ANTE G, LATOMBE J C. Planning multi-goal tours for robot arms[C]// 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. New York: IEEE Press, 2003: 3797-3803. |
| [10] | BEST G, FAIGL J, FITCH R. Multi-robot path planning for budgeted active perception with self-organising maps[C]// 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. New York: IEEE Press, 2016: 3164-3171. |
| [11] | DAVIS B R, BRAY E, BEST G. Multi-goal path planning in cluttered environments with PRM-guided self-organising maps[C]// 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. New York: IEEE Press, 2024: 10746-10753. |
| [12] | HUANG Y, GU K R, LEE H H. S&Reg: end-to-end learning- based model for multi-goal path planning problem[C]// The 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. New York: IEEE Press, 2023: 647-653. |
| [13] |
HUANG Y, ZHANG Y L. S&Regv2: a probabilistically complete sampling-based planner to solve multi-goal path finding problem via multi-task learning networks[J]. Advanced Robotics, 2024, 38(23): 1668-1678.
DOI URL |
| [14] | VONÁSEK V, PĚNIČKA R. Space-filling forest for multi-goal path planning[C]// The 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. New York: IEEE Press, 2019: 1587-1590. |
| [15] |
JANOŠ J, VONÁSEK V, PĚNIČKA R. Multi-goal path planning using multiple random trees[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2021, 6(2): 4201-4208.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
GIANG T T C, BINH H T T, LUONG H V D, et al. Fast marching firework method for multi-goal mobile robot path planning in complex obstacle maps[J]. Intelligent Service Robotics, 2025, 18(6): 1467-1484.
DOI |
| [17] |
CHANDAK N, CHOUR K, RATHINAM S, et al. Informed Steiner trees: sampling and pruning for multi-goal path finding in high dimensions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2024, 21(4): 5048-5061.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
ALLUS A, UNEL M. Angle-based multi-goal ordering and path-planning using an improved A-star algorithm[J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2025, 190: 105001.
DOI URL |
| [19] | WANG H D, XIONG X G, ZHOU H X, et al. Time-varying multi-goal path planning with multi-tree RRT* algorithm for quadruped robots[C]// The 18th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision. New York: IEEE Press, 2024: 543-548. |
| [20] | LU Y J, DAS D, PLAKU E, et al. Multi-goal motion memory[C]// 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. New York: IEEE Press, 2025: 8864-8871. |
| [21] | KRONEMAN W, VALENTE J, VAN DER STAPPEN A F. A fast two-stage approach for multi-goal path planning in a fruit tree[C]// 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. New York: IEEE Press, 2023: 1586-1593. |
| [22] | HELSGAUN K. An extension of the Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun TSP solver for constrained traveling salesman and vehicle routing problems: technical report[R]. Roskilde: Roskilde University, 2017. |
| [23] |
ROMANUKE V. Traveling salesman problem parallelization by solving clustered subproblems[J]. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 2023, 48(4): 453-481.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
ARORA P, DEEPALI N, VARSHNEY S. Analysis of K-Means and K-Medoids algorithm for big data[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2016, 78: 507-512.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
FAIGL J, VÁŇA P, DECKEROVÁ J. Fast heuristics for the 3D multi-goal path planning based on the generalized traveling salesman problem with neighborhoods[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2019, 4(3): 2439-2446.
DOI URL |
| [1] | LIU Chang, MA Hongyu, SHEN Liyong, YUAN Chunming, ZHANG Bowen, LI Shichu. A novel approach of two-stage high-efficiency rough machining toolpath generation [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2025, 46(6): 1183-1190. |
| [2] | HU Yue, SUN Zhida, HUANG Hui. Visual analysis system for UAV path planning [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2025, 46(3): 655-665. |
| [3] | JIA Mingchao, FENG Bin, WU Peng, ZHANG Kun, SANG Shengju. A path planning for cultural tourism service robot combining improved A* algorithm and improved dynamic window approach [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2024, 45(3): 505-515. |
| [4] | DING Jian-chuan, XIAO Jin-tong, ZHAO Ke-xin, JIA Dong-qing, CUI Bing-de, YANG Xin. Spiking neural network-based navigation and obstacle avoidance algorithm for complex scenes [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2023, 44(6): 1121-1129. |
| [5] | MA Hong-yu , SHEN Li-yong , JIANG Xin , ZOU Qiang , YUAN Chun-ming. A survey of path planning and feedrate interpolation in computer numerical control [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2022, 43(6): 967-986. |
| [6] | DENG Yang-yang, LI Wei-shi . Partitioned scanning path planning for selective laser melting of thin-walled parts [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2022, 43(1): 149-155. |
| [7] | MA Tian, YANG Qin, LI Zhan-i. Orthodontic path planning based on improved multi-PSO [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2021, 42(4): 615-622. |
| [8] | LI Zhan-li, LIU Tong-xin, LI Hong-an, SUN Zhi-hao. Research on path planning of teeth movement in invisible orthodontic [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2020, 41(4): 556-566. |
| [9] | HU Peng, LI Lin, YANG Jing, LIU Xiao-ping . Research on Path Planning Method of Ancient Architectural Scene Based on Depth Map and Aesthetic Evaluation [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2019, 40(6): 1032-1037. |
| [10] | SUN Rui, ZHANG Wen-sheng . Smooth Path Planning of Mobile Robot Based on Improved Ant Colony Algorithm [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2019, 40(2): 344-350. |
| [11] | LIU Jiawei, CHEN Shuangmin, WANG Xiaoli, XIN Shiqing. Optimal Nozzle Path Planning in 3D Printing [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2017, 38(1): 34-38. |
| [12] | Wang Fenghong, Deng Zhiyan, Chen Chikun. Mobile robot path planning based on improved genetic algorithm [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2012, 33(3): 41-45. |
| [13] | HU Sheng-hong. Optimizing the Laser Machining Path of DXF File Drawn with Region Graphics [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2010, 31(6): 106-110. |
| [14] | KANG Liang, ZHAO Chun-xia, GUO Jian-hui. Path Planning for Mobile Robot in Unknown Environment Based on Cubic Spiral Bug Algorithm [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2010, 31(1): 30-38. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
