Journal of Graphics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1033-1042.DOI: 10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026051033
Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Zhiyong1, LIU Di1, JIANG Shan1, ZHOU Zeyang1, HAN Jun2, ZHU Shan2, CHEN Chao2(
)
Received:2026-05-11
Accepted:2026-07-31
Online:2026-10-31
Published:2026-10-26
Supported by:CLC Number:
YANG Zhiyong, LIU Di, JIANG Shan, ZHOU Zeyang, HAN Jun, ZHU Shan, CHEN Chao. A multi-stage CT-MRI registration method for spine based on multi-vertebra structural modeling[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(5): 1033-1042.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.txxb.com.cn/EN/10.11996/JG.j.2095-302X.2026051033
Fig. 1 Automatic segmentation results of CT ((a) Original CT image; (b)~(d) Segmentation results at different sagittal slices; (e) 3D reconstruction result)
Fig. 2 Automatic segmentation results of MRI ((a) Original MRI image; (b)~(d) Segmentation results at different sagittal slices; (e) 3D reconstruction result)
| 模块 | 尺度变化 | 主要操作 | 通道数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 输入层 | 1 | CT与MRI通道拼接 | 2 |
| 编码器 | 1→1/16 | 4个3D下采样卷积块,步长为2,InstanceNorm3D,LeakyReLU(0.2) | 2→16→32→32→32 |
| 多椎体仿射分支 | 1/16 | 深层特征展平后分别输入K个全连接层,每层输出一个3×4仿射矩阵 | K×12 |
| 多尺度仿射先验 | 1/16,1/8,1/4,1/2 | 将K个椎体仿射矩阵转换为多尺度稠密位移先验,并在通道维度拼接 | 3K |
| 解码融合模块 | 1/16→1 | 4个组合单元逐层融合编码器特征、上采样特征和仿射先验 | 32 |
| 特征细化模块 | 1 | 3个3D卷积块进一步细化全分辨率特征 | 32→32→16→16 |
| 速度场预测层 | 1 | 3×3×3卷积输出三维速度场 | 16→3 |
| 形变场生成 | 1 | scaling-and-squaring积分,积分步数为7 | 3 |
Table 1 Main structural parameters of the fine registration network
| 模块 | 尺度变化 | 主要操作 | 通道数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 输入层 | 1 | CT与MRI通道拼接 | 2 |
| 编码器 | 1→1/16 | 4个3D下采样卷积块,步长为2,InstanceNorm3D,LeakyReLU(0.2) | 2→16→32→32→32 |
| 多椎体仿射分支 | 1/16 | 深层特征展平后分别输入K个全连接层,每层输出一个3×4仿射矩阵 | K×12 |
| 多尺度仿射先验 | 1/16,1/8,1/4,1/2 | 将K个椎体仿射矩阵转换为多尺度稠密位移先验,并在通道维度拼接 | 3K |
| 解码融合模块 | 1/16→1 | 4个组合单元逐层融合编码器特征、上采样特征和仿射先验 | 32 |
| 特征细化模块 | 1 | 3个3D卷积块进一步细化全分辨率特征 | 32→32→16→16 |
| 速度场预测层 | 1 | 3×3×3卷积输出三维速度场 | 16→3 |
| 形变场生成 | 1 | scaling-and-squaring积分,积分步数为7 | 3 |
| 方法 | Dice /%↑ | HD95 /mm↓ | ASD /mm↓ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affine[ | 79.64±6.95 | 7.58±2.31 | 3.64±0.81 |
| ANTs-SyN[ | 81.37±3.34 | 6.18±1.54 | 2.37±0.43 |
| VoxelMorph[ | 88.95±2.05 | 5.47±1.22 | 1.61±0.35 |
| LapIRN[ | 86.24±3.52 | 5.27±1.47 | 1.75±0.58 |
| TransMorph[ | 90.65±1.84 | 3.85±1.18 | 1.43±0.38 |
| Ours | 91.43±1.52 | 2.61±0.81 | 1.16±0.41 |
Table 2 Quantitative comparison of CT-MRI registration results among different methods
| 方法 | Dice /%↑ | HD95 /mm↓ | ASD /mm↓ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affine[ | 79.64±6.95 | 7.58±2.31 | 3.64±0.81 |
| ANTs-SyN[ | 81.37±3.34 | 6.18±1.54 | 2.37±0.43 |
| VoxelMorph[ | 88.95±2.05 | 5.47±1.22 | 1.61±0.35 |
| LapIRN[ | 86.24±3.52 | 5.27±1.47 | 1.75±0.58 |
| TransMorph[ | 90.65±1.84 | 3.85±1.18 | 1.43±0.38 |
| Ours | 91.43±1.52 | 2.61±0.81 | 1.16±0.41 |
| 方法 | 配准时间/s | 参数量/M | GPU memory/MB |
|---|---|---|---|
| VoxelMorph[ | 0.496±0.003 | 0.31 | 1 682 |
| LapIRN[ | 0.429±0.003 | 1.26 | 2 742 |
| TransMorph[ | 0.645±0.004 | 46.73 | 6 704 |
| Ours | 0.710±0.005 | 8.28 | 4 733 |
Table 3 Comparison of inference efficiency among fine registration networks
| 方法 | 配准时间/s | 参数量/M | GPU memory/MB |
|---|---|---|---|
| VoxelMorph[ | 0.496±0.003 | 0.31 | 1 682 |
| LapIRN[ | 0.429±0.003 | 1.26 | 2 742 |
| TransMorph[ | 0.645±0.004 | 46.73 | 6 704 |
| Ours | 0.710±0.005 | 8.28 | 4 733 |
| 方法 | Dice /% ↑ | HD95 /mm ↓ | ASD /mm ↓ |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | 76.53±4.83 | 6.24±1.46 | 2.18±0.52 |
| B+Coarse | 84.51±2.34 | 4.86±1.23 | 1.63±0.43 |
| B+Coarse+MVA | 86.28±1.78 | 4.56±1.06 | 1.48±0.44 |
| B+Coarse+MVA+Diff | 89.62±1.54 | 3.12±0.92 | 1.28±0.42 |
| Ours | 91.43±1.52 | 2.61±0.81 | 1.16±0.41 |
Table 4 Ablation study of the proposed method
| 方法 | Dice /% ↑ | HD95 /mm ↓ | ASD /mm ↓ |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | 76.53±4.83 | 6.24±1.46 | 2.18±0.52 |
| B+Coarse | 84.51±2.34 | 4.86±1.23 | 1.63±0.43 |
| B+Coarse+MVA | 86.28±1.78 | 4.56±1.06 | 1.48±0.44 |
| B+Coarse+MVA+Diff | 89.62±1.54 | 3.12±0.92 | 1.28±0.42 |
| Ours | 91.43±1.52 | 2.61±0.81 | 1.16±0.41 |
| [1] |
JITPAKDEE K, LIU Y T, HEO D H, et al. Minimally invasive endoscopy in spine surgery: where are we now?[J]. European Spine Journal, 2023, 32(8): 2755-2768.
DOI PMID |
| [2] |
MAAYAN O, MAI E, KIM A Y E, et al. Overview of endoscopic spine surgery and learning curve[J]. Seminars in Spine Surgery, 2024, 36(1): 101079.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
EL CHOUEIRI J, PELLICANÒ F, CAIMI E, et al. Advancements in spinal endoscopic surgery: comprehensive techniques and pathologies addressed by full endoscopy beyond lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025, 14(11): 3685.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
GUO X B, JIN J T, CHEN J W, et al. Preoperative application of CT and MRI registration in lumbar disc herniation endoscopic surgery could improve the postoperative rehabilitation of patients[J]. American Journal of Translational Research, 2024, 16(6): 2453-2463.
DOI PMID |
| [5] |
LI H Y, LIU H L, XIAO M Q, et al. CT-3D MERGE fusion imaging improves image quality compared with CT and 3D MERGE in patients with lumbar disc herniation[J]. Frontiers in Neurology, 2024, 15: 1490033.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
JIANG Z W, ZHU Y H, WANG W, et al. Evaluation of MRI-based synthetic CT for lumbar degenerative disease: a comparison with CT[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 20548.
DOI |
| [7] |
KAVRAKOVA I G, HAAGE P, STUECKLE C A. Current state-of-the-art 3D MRI sequences for assessing bone morphology with emphasis on cranial and spinal imaging: a narrative review[J]. RöFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2026, 198(3): 301-324.
DOI URL |
| [8] | MOK T C W, CHUNG A C S. Fast symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with convolutional neural networks[C]// 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE Press, 2020: 4643-4652. |
| [9] | VIOLA P, WELLS W M. Alignment by maximization of mutual information[C]// IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. New York: IEEE Press, 1995: 16-23. |
| [10] |
AVANTS B B, TUSTISON N J, SONG G, et al. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration[J]. NeuroImage, 2011, 54(3): 2033-2044.
DOI PMID |
| [11] |
VELESACA H O, BASTIDAS G, ROUHANI M, et al. Multimodal image registration techniques: a comprehensive survey[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024, 83(23): 63919-63947.
DOI |
| [12] |
DE VOS B D, BERENDSEN F F, VIERGEVER M A, et al. A deep learning framework for unsupervised affine and deformable image registration[J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2019, 52: 128-143.
DOI PMID |
| [13] |
BALAKRISHNAN G, ZHAO A, SABUNCU M R, et al. VoxelMorph: a learning framework for deformable medical image registration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2019, 38(8): 1788-1800.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
KREBS J, DELINGETTE H, MAILHÉ B, et al. Learning a probabilistic model for diffeomorphic registration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2019, 38(9): 2165-2176.
DOI PMID |
| [15] |
CHEN J Y, FREY E C, HE Y F, et al. TransMorph: transformer for unsupervised medical image registration[J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2022, 82: 102615.
DOI URL |
| [16] | JIAN B L, AZAMPOUR M F, DE BENETTI F, et al. Weakly-supervised biomechanically-constrained CT/MRI registration of the spine[C]// The 25th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention. Cham: Springer, 2022: 227-236. |
| [17] | KETCHA M D, DE SILVA T, UNERI A, et al. Multi-stage 3D-2D registration for correction of anatomical deformation in image-guided spine surgery[J]. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2017, 62(11): 4604-4622. |
| [18] |
STRITTMATTER A, SCHAD L R, ZÖLLNER F G. Deep learning-based affine medical image registration for multimodal minimal-invasive image-guided interventions - a comparative study on generalizability[J]. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik, 2024, 34(2): 291-317.
DOI URL |
| [19] | JENA R, SETHI D, CHAUDHARI P, et al. Deep learning in medical image registration: magic or mirage?[C]// The 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc., 2024: 108331-108353. |
| [20] |
DIAZ-PINTO A, ALLE S, NATH V, et al. MONAI Label: a framework for AI-assisted interactive labeling of 3D medical images[J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2024, 95: 103207.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
AKINCI D’ANTONOLI T, BERGER L K, INDRAKANTI A K, et al. TotalSegmentator MRI: robust sequence-independent segmentation of multiple anatomic structures in MRI[J]. Radiology, 2025, 314(2): e241613.
DOI URL |
| [22] | MATTES D, HAYNOR D R, VESSELLE H, et al. Nonrigid multimodality image registration[C]//Medical Imaging 2001: Image Processing. Bellingham: SPIE, 2001, 4322: 406-417. |
| [23] | MOK T C W, CHUNG A C S. Large deformation diffeomorphic image registration with Laplacian pyramid networks[C]// The 23rd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention. Cham: Springer, 2020: 211-221. |
| [1] | WU Xue, LIU Ziping. A multi-football-player tracking model based on improved Deep-EIoU [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(5): 1001-1014. |
| [2] | SHI Xindi, ZHAO Haoran, WANG Shuoyang, CHEN Dong, WANG Xupeng, ZHOU Wei, FENG Song, SHI Xueqing, WEI Penghao, ZHAO Fei. Research progress on plankton image acquisition and recognition technologies for water environmental management [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(5): 971-983. |
| [3] | ZHAO Jie, YANG Ruoquan, WU Bin. Document image tampering region segmentation method based on multi-feature fusion [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(5): 984-993. |
| [4] | LI Yuhua, JIANG Shan, YANG Zhiyong, WANG Yuze, ZHOU Zeyang. Physically-augmented and depth synergized freehand 3D ultrasound reconstruction [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(4): 726-735. |
| [5] | WANG Yutao, YANG Chao, KUANG Liqun, YANG Xiaowen, HAN Xie, JIAO Shichao. Hierarchical alignment for zero-shot sketch-based 3D shape retrieval [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(4): 844-853. |
| [6] | LI Xiumei, ZHOU Zhengxin, SUN Junmei. A multi-task collaborative image forgery detection framework assisted by localization branch [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(3): 524-533. |
| [7] | WU Wenhuan, WANG Wenshu, WANG Shuao. Monocular depth estimation method with hierarchical dual-stream attention [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(3): 553-563. |
| [8] | LU Dehui, SONG Zhuo, HUANG Zhichao, TIAN Shiyu, LI Huimin, TIAN Mao, DENG Yichuan. Subjective visual perception prediction of green construction sites based on TrueSkill ranking and deep learning [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(3): 641-652. |
| [9] | YAN Kang, ZENG Li, GU Xiaoqing. Cross-domain structured deep dictionary learning for image classification [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(2): 341-350. |
| [10] | PANG Min, LI Zhentang, ZHANG Yuan, CUI Xiaokang, XIONG Fengguang. 3D model reconstruction based on retrieval and deformation techniques [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(2): 368-379. |
| [11] | DONG Wenyi, YANG Weidong, TANG Binghui, WANG Qi, XIAO Hongyu. Review of deep learning based methods for detecting focal liver lesions [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(1): 1-16. |
| [12] | ZHAI Yongjie, WANG Zixuan, ZHANG Zhenqi, ZHOU Xunqi, WANG Qianming. A vehicle damage classification model incorporating dual attention and weighted dynamic convolution [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(1): 17-28. |
| [13] | PAN Yuxuan, JIN Rui, LIU Yu, ZHANG Lin. Generative model based unsupervised multi-view stereo network [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(1): 29-38. |
| [14] | JIU Mingyuan, WU Guowei, SONG Xuguang, LI Shupan, XU Mingliang. Image classification method based on uncertainty-driven smart reinforcement active learning [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(1): 47-56. |
| [15] | YANG Biao, WANG Xue, GUAN Zheng, LONG Ping. BSD-YOLO: a small target vehicle detection method based on dynamic sparse attention and adaptive detection head [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2026, 47(1): 99-110. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||